C A Engh1, S J MacDonald2, S Sritulanondha1, A Korczak2, D Naudie2, C Engh1. 1. Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute, P.O. Box 7088, Alexandria, VA 22306. E-mail address for C.A. Engh: research@aori.org. 2. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre-University Hospital, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has requested post-market surveillance data, including data on metal ion levels, regarding metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. We performed a prospective, randomized study of metal ion levels in erythrocytes, serum, and whole bloodat five years after 28 and 36-mm metal-on-metal and 28-mm metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty. METHODS:One hundred and five enrolled patients were randomized equally to the three bearing surface options and were blinded with regard to their treatment group. Metal ion measurements and clinical evaluations were performed at regular intervals. RESULTS:Cobalt and chromium ion levels in all blood sample types at the five-year time point were significantly lower in the metal-on-polyethylene group than in each of the two metal-on-metal groups (p < 0.001) with the exception of chromium in erythrocytes (p = 0.194). Cobalt in serum (p = 0.029) and erythrocytes (p = 0.002) showed significant increases from two to five years in the 36-mm metal-on-metal group; similar increases were not seen in the 28-mm metal-on-metal group. At five years, five patients in the 36-mm metal-on-metal group and none in the 28-mm metal-on-metal group had cobalt or chromium levels of >7 ppb. Correlations among levels in serum, erythrocyte, and whole blood were stronger for cobalt than for chromium. One patient in the 36-mm metal-on-metal group underwent revision because of an adverse local tissue reaction. CONCLUSIONS: The 36-mm metal-on-metal bearing underperformed the 28-mm metal-on-metal bearing with respect to metal ion levels. The authors are closely following all patients treated with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has requested post-market surveillance data, including data on metal ion levels, regarding metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. We performed a prospective, randomized study of metal ion levels in erythrocytes, serum, and whole blood at five years after 28 and 36-mm metal-on-metal and 28-mm metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: One hundred and five enrolled patients were randomized equally to the three bearing surface options and were blinded with regard to their treatment group. Metal ion measurements and clinical evaluations were performed at regular intervals. RESULTS:Cobalt and chromium ion levels in all blood sample types at the five-year time point were significantly lower in the metal-on-polyethylene group than in each of the two metal-on-metal groups (p < 0.001) with the exception of chromium in erythrocytes (p = 0.194). Cobalt in serum (p = 0.029) and erythrocytes (p = 0.002) showed significant increases from two to five years in the 36-mm metal-on-metal group; similar increases were not seen in the 28-mm metal-on-metal group. At five years, five patients in the 36-mm metal-on-metal group and none in the 28-mm metal-on-metal group had cobalt or chromium levels of >7 ppb. Correlations among levels in serum, erythrocyte, and whole blood were stronger for cobalt than for chromium. One patient in the 36-mm metal-on-metal group underwent revision because of an adverse local tissue reaction. CONCLUSIONS: The 36-mm metal-on-metal bearing underperformed the 28-mm metal-on-metal bearing with respect to metal ion levels. The authors are closely following all patients treated with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
Authors: Antonio Klasan; Esko Meine; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann; Turgay Efe; Friedrich Boettner; Thomas Jan Heyse Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: David John Langton; Raghavendra Prasad Sidaginamale; Peter Avery; Sue Waller; Ghanshyabhai Tank; James Lord; Thomas Joyce; Nick Cooke; Raj Logishetty; Antoni Viraf Francis Nargol Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-04-29 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: B G Pijls; J M T A Meessen; J W Schoones; M Fiocco; H J L van der Heide; A Sedrakyan; R G H H Nelissen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-06-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Caroline Fortmann; Thomas Göen; Marcus Krüger; Benno M Ure; Claus Petersen; Joachim F Kübler Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-10-12 Impact factor: 3.240