Literature DB >> 24643328

Myocardial scar identification based on analysis of Look-Locker and 3D late gadolinium enhanced MRI.

Qian Tao1, Hildo J Lamb, Katja Zeppenfeld, Rob J van der Geest.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to introduce and evaluate an approach for objective and reproducible scar identification from late gadolinium enhanced (LGE) MR by analysis of LGE data with post-contrast T(1) mapping from a routinely acquired T(1) scout Look-Locker (LL) sequence. In 90 post-infarction patients, a LL sequence was acquired prior to a three-dimensional LGE sequence covering the entire left ventricle. In 60/90 patients (training set), the T(1) relaxation rates of remote myocardium and dense myocardial scar were linearly regressed to that of blood. The learned linear relationship was applied to 30/90 patients (validation set) to identify the remote myocardium and dense scar, and to normalize the LGE signal intensity to a range from 0 to 100 %. A 50 % threshold was applied to identify myocardial scar. In the validation set, two observers independently performed manual scar identification, annotated reference regions for the full-width-half-maxima (FWHM) and standard deviation (SD) method, and analyzed the LL sequence for the proposed method. Compared with the manual, FWHM, and SD methods, the proposed method demonstrated the highest inter-class correlation coefficient (0.997) and Dice overlap index (98.7 ± 1.3 %) between the two observers. The proposed method also showed excellent agreement with the gold-standard manual scar identification, with a Dice index of 89.8 ± 7.5 and 90.2 ± 6.6 % for the two observers, respectively. Combined analysis of LL and LGE sequences leads to objective and reproducible myocardial scar identification in post-infarction patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24643328     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-014-0402-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  18 in total

1.  Myocardial T1 mapping with MRI: comparison of look-locker and MOLLI sequences.

Authors:  Marcelo Souto Nacif; Evrim B Turkbey; Neville Gai; Saman Nazarian; Rob J van der Geest; Radwa A Noureldin; Christopher T Sibley; Martin Ugander; Songtao Liu; Andrew E Arai; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: quantification of late gadolinium enhancement with contrast-enhanced cardiovascular MR imaging.

Authors:  Caitlin J Harrigan; Dana C Peters; C Michael Gibson; Barry J Maron; Warren J Manning; Martin S Maron; Evan Appelbaum
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Infarct tissue heterogeneity assessed with contrast-enhanced MRI predicts spontaneous ventricular arrhythmia in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Authors:  Stijntje D Roes; C Jan Willem Borleffs; Rob J van der Geest; Jos J M Westenberg; Nina Ajmone Marsan; Theodorus A M Kaandorp; Johan H C Reiber; Katja Zeppenfeld; Hildo J Lamb; Albert de Roos; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 7.792

4.  Characterization of the peri-infarct zone by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is a powerful predictor of post-myocardial infarction mortality.

Authors:  Andrew T Yan; Adolphe J Shayne; Kenneth A Brown; Sandeep N Gupta; Carmen W Chan; Tuan M Luu; Marcelo F Di Carli; H Glenn Reynolds; William G Stevenson; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-06-26       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Motion correction for myocardial T1 mapping using image registration with synthetic image estimation.

Authors:  Hui Xue; Saurabh Shah; Andreas Greiser; Christoph Guetter; Arne Littmann; Marie-Pierre Jolly; Andrew E Arai; Sven Zuehlsdorff; Jens Guehring; Peter Kellman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function.

Authors:  R J Kim; D S Fieno; T B Parrish; K Harris; E L Chen; O Simonetti; J Bundy; J P Finn; F J Klocke; R M Judd
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-11-09       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Accurate and objective infarct sizing by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in a canine myocardial infarction model.

Authors:  Luciano C Amado; Bernhard L Gerber; Sandeep N Gupta; Dan W Rettmann; Gilberto Szarf; Robert Schock; Khurram Nasir; Dara L Kraitchman; João A C Lima
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Shortened Modified Look-Locker Inversion recovery (ShMOLLI) for clinical myocardial T1-mapping at 1.5 and 3 T within a 9 heartbeat breathhold.

Authors:  Stefan K Piechnik; Vanessa M Ferreira; Erica Dall'Armellina; Lowri E Cochlin; Andreas Greiser; Stefan Neubauer; Matthew D Robson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Alterations in T1 of normal and reperfused infarcted myocardium after Gd-BOPTA versus GD-DTPA on inversion recovery EPI.

Authors:  M F Wendland; M Saeed; K Lauerma; N Derugin; J Mintorovitch; F M Cavagna; C B Higgins
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Quantification of late gadolinium enhanced CMR in viability assessment in chronic ischemic heart disease: a comparison to functional outcome.

Authors:  Aernout M Beek; Olga Bondarenko; Farshid Afsharzada; Albert C van Rossum
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2014 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.357

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.