Literature DB >> 24642870

Characterization of rare transforming KRAS mutations in sporadic colorectal cancer.

Joanna H M Tong1, Raymond W M Lung1, Frankie M C Sin1, Peggy P Y Law1, Wei Kang1, Anthony W H Chan2, Brigette B Y Ma3, Tony W C Mak4, Simon S M Ng5, Ka Fai To1.   

Abstract

KRAS mutational status has been shown to be a predictive biomarker of resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. We report the spectrum of KRAS mutation in 1506 patients with colorectal cancer and the identification and characterization of rare insertion mutations within the functional domain of KRAS. KRAS mutations are found in 44.5% (670/1506) of the patients. Two cases are found to harbor double mutations involving both codons 12 and 13. The frequencies of KRAS mutations at its codons 12, 13, 61, and 146 are 75.1%, 19.3%, 2.5%, and 2.7%, respectively. The most abundant mutation of codon 12 is G12D, followed by G12V and G12C while G13D is the predominant mutation in codon 13. Mutations in other codons are rare. The KRAS mutation rate is significantly higher in women (48%, 296/617) than in men (42.1%, 374/889, P = 0.023). Tumors on the right colon have a higher frequency of KRAS mutations than those on the left (57.3% vs. 40.4%, P<0.0001). Two in-frame insertion mutations affect the phosphate-binding loop (codon 10-16) of KRAS are identified. One of them has never been reported before. Compared with wild-type protein, the insertion variants enhance the cellular accumulation of active RAS (RAS-GTP) and constitutively activate the downstream signaling pathway. NIH3T3 cells transfected with the insertion variants show enhanced anchorage-independent growth and in vivo tumorigenicity. Potentially these mutations contribute to primary resistance to anti-EGFR mAb therapy but the clinical implication requires further validation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  KRAS; colorectal cancer; targeted therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24642870      PMCID: PMC4049792          DOI: 10.4161/cbt.28550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther        ISSN: 1538-4047            Impact factor:   4.742


Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common lethal cancers worldwide. In 2008, more than 1.2 million new cases were diagnosed, with approximately 608 700 deaths estimated to have occurred. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a critical molecule in CRC initiation and progression, is frequently overexpressed in metastatic CRC (mCRC) tumors., The phenomena lead to the development of molecular targeting therapy to inhibit the EGFR signaling pathway. Using anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) such as cetuximab and panitumumab, have been approved in treating mCRC to inhibit EGFR activity and hence switching off downstream pathways., However, anti-EGFR therapy does not work on all CRCs, largely due to the resistance to the anti-EGFR mAbs. Different studies have reported the response and outcome of CRCs to the anti-EGFR mAbs was poor with KRAS mutation which accounting for 30–40% of non-responsive cases.- KRAS mutation status is now considered to be a predictive biomarker of resistance to anti-EGFR mAbs treatment for mCRC patients. KRAS is one of the RAS superfamily of proto-oncoproteins which is small signal switch molecule called GTPase, cycling between inactive GDP-bound (RAS-GDP) and active GTP-bound (RAS-GTP) forms, to regulate cellular growth and differentiation. Activating mutations of RAS proto-oncogenes continuously elevate the cytoplasmic RAS-GTP level. Oncogenic signaling pathways, such as Raf-MEK-ERK and PI3K/AKT cascades, are then constitutively activated in an EGFR activation-independent manner and therefore promote cell cycle progression., KRAS mutation is found in 40% of CRCs and missense point mutation is the most common mutation. The majority of the point mutation sites of KRAS in CRC patients are located at codons 12 and 13 (~80% and ~17%, respectively), together with rare mutations at codons 61 and 146 (~1–4%).,- Most clinical studies of KRAS mutation in CRC were conducted in western countries. However, KRAS mutation rate or spectrum in CRCs may partially depends on the population studied. It has been reported that KRAS mutations were identified in CRC patients from the UK, Switzerland, and Spain, for 27.4%, 38%, and 41% respectively. This epidemiological variation indicates the essence of establishment of a local CRC KRAS mutation data in different populations. There has been a dramatic increase in reported incidence of colorectal cancer in Asian. It is of paramount importance to investigate the KRAS mutation spectrum in our locality in view of the implication in using anti-EGFR targeting therapy. We aim to analyze the KRAS mutation status and the clinical correlation in Chinese patients with CRC in Hong Kong. Here we report the spectrum of KRAS mutation in a large cohort of colorectal cancer and the identification and characterization of a novel insertion mutation within the function domain of KRAS.

Results

Clinical characteristics of the patients

We tested a total of 1506 patients with colorectal cancer. Of them 889 (59%) were males and 617 (41%) were females. The median age at presentation was 61 ± 11.3 y (range 21–89 y). The clinical characteristics were in keeping with other reported populations of colorectal cancer. The age of female patients were slightly younger than males (59 ± 12.1 vs 61 ± 11.2, P = 0.014). There was significantly higher frequency of left colon tumor (75.8%) than the right side (24.2%, P < 0.0001). However, the right side tumors were more common in females (28.7%) compared with males (21.1%, P = 0.001). When rectal tumor was considered a separate entity, female patients had a higher frequency of right side tumor whereas the rectal tumors were more commonly found in male patients (P < 0.0001). The clinical characteristics of the patients tested were summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Clinical characteristics of 1506 patients tested for KRAS status

 TotalFemaleMaleP value
n =1506617 (41%)889 (59%) 
Age61 ± 11.359 ± 12.161 ± 11.20.014
Tumor site (right vs left)  0.001
Right365 (24.2%)177 (28.7%)188 (21.1%) 
Left1141 (75.8%)440 (71.3%)701 (78.9%) 
Tumor site (right vs left vs rectum)  < 0.0001
Right365 (24.2%)177 (28.7%)188 (21.1%) 
Left538 (35.7%)228 (40.0%)310 (34.9%) 
Rectum603 (40.1%)212 (34.3%)391 (44.0%) 

Status of KRAS mutation

KRAS mutations on codons 12, 13, 61 and 146 were analyzed by PCR-direct sequencing using microdissected FFPE tumor tissues from 1506 patients. A total of 672 KRAS mutations were identified from 670 patients (44.5%, 670 out of 1506, Table 2). Two cases were found to harbor double mutations. Both cases involved codon 12 and codon 13 of KRAS gene. One case harbored concomitant G12C and G13D, while the other had both G12V and G13D. Within 672 KRAS mutations identified, the frequencies of mutations at codons 12, 13, 61, and 146 were 75.1%, 19.3%, 2.5%, and 2.7%, respectively. Majority of the mutations occurred at codons 12 and 13 which accounted for more than 94% of all mutations identified. The most common mutation was glycine to aspartate on codon 12 (G12D), which accounted for 37.5% of all mutations (252 out of 672). Mutation from glycine to valine (G12V) was the second most common of all specified mutations (20.1%; 135 of 672). Mutation from glycine to aspartate on codon 13 (G13D) accounted for 19.0% (128 of 672) of specified mutations.

Table 2. KRAS mutations spectrum in 670 colorectal cancers

MutationFrequencyPercentage
Codon 1250575.1%
G12D25237.5%
G12V13520.1%
G12C466.8%
G12S334.9%
G12A294.3%
G12R101.5%
Codon1313019.3%
G13D12819.0%
G13C20.3%
Codon 61172.5%
Q61H91.3%
Q61L50.7%
Q61K10.1%
Q61R20.3%
Codon 146182.7%
A146T182.7%
Others20.3%
c.30_31insGGA, p.G10_A11insG10.1%
c.33_34insGGAGCT:p.A11_G12insGA10.1%
Total672a100%

aA total of 672 KRAS mutations were detected from 670 colorectal tumors. Two tumors harbored double mutations.

aA total of 672 KRAS mutations were detected from 670 colorectal tumors. Two tumors harbored double mutations. The KRAS mutation rate was significantly higher in women (48%, 296 of 617, Table 3) than in men (42.1%, 374 of 889, P = 0.023). The mutation rate did not differ according to the primary tumor site if the tumor location was classified as either ascending, hepatic flexure, transverse, splenic flexure, descending, sigmoid, or rectum. If the tumors on the right side of the colon (ascending and transverse colon) were group together and compared with those on the left (splenic flexure to rectum), the frequency of KRAS mutations were significantly higher in the right colon (57.3% vs. 40.4%, P < 0.0001). The KRAS mutation was not associated with the age of the patient. In comparison of the most frequently mutated codons between left and right colon, codon 12 mutations were significantly more likely to occur in rectum (right colon 28.8%, left colon 29.7%, rectum 41.6%), while codon 13 mutations were slightly more frequent in the right colon (right colon 40%, left colon 30.8%, rectum 29.2%, P = 0.013)

Table 3. Correlation of KRAS mutation status with clinical features

CharacteristicsKRAS mutationTotalP value
+
n = 1506    
No. cases670 (44.5%)836 (55.5%)  
Age61.3 ± 11.360.5 ± 11.3 NS
Gender   0.023
F296 (48%)321 (52%)617 
M374 (42.1%)515 (57.9%)889 
Age62.1 ± 10.160.4 ± 9.0 NS
Tumor site (right vs left)    
Right209 (57.3%)156 (42.7%)365< 0.0001
Left461 (40.4%)680 (59.6%)1141 
Total6708361506 
Tumor site (right vs left vs rectum)   < 0.0001
Right209 (57.3%)156 (42.7%)365 
Left198 (36.8%)340 (63.2%)538 
Rectum263 (43.6%)340 (56.4%)603 
Total6708361506 

Identification of rare KRAS insertion mutations

In the pool of CRC cases, we identified two rare KRAS mutations which were defined as in-frame insertion mutations. The Insertion mutations in KRAS exon 2 of patient #286 and #833 were further validated by direct sequencing of the cloned PCR products (Fig. 1). In patient #286, an in-flame insertion of 3-nucleotide (GGA) between codons 10 and 11 was observed (c.30_31insGGA: p.G10_A11insG). This rare mutation, which suggested the insertion of a glycine residue between glycine (amino acid 10) and alanine (amino acid 11), was reported once in the patient with myeloid leukemia. In patient #833, a tandem repeat sequences of codon 10 and 11 (GGA GCT) was in-flame inserted after codons 11 and introduced extra glycine and alanine residues between alanine (codon 11) and glycine (codon 12). This insertion mutation (c.33_34insGGAGCT:p.A11_G12insGA) has never been reported before. These two mutations are named 10G11 and 11GA12 respectively.

Figure 1. Electropherogram for KRAS mutants. Tissue DNA from the patient with colorectal cancer were amplified and cloned for sequencing analysis. Two novel in-flame insertions (10G11 and 11GA12) in exon 2 of KRAS gene were identified.

Figure 1. Electropherogram for KRAS mutants. Tissue DNA from the patient with colorectal cancer were amplified and cloned for sequencing analysis. Two novel in-flame insertions (10G11 and 11GA12) in exon 2 of KRAS gene were identified.

KRAS exon 2 insertions activate RAS signaling pathway and enhance NIH3T3 cells transformation

To investigate whether the newly found 10G11 and 11GA12 KRAS mutation activate RAS activity, we constructed expression plasmids and transiently transfected into 293FT and NIH3T3 cells. As a control, expression plasmids carrying wild-type KRAS (KRAS-WT) and a well-known active KRAS mutant (KRAS-G12V) were used for comparison during the basic functional assay. Compared with the cells transfected with WT expression plasmid, overexpression of 10G11 and 11GA12 KRAS mutants in cell lines resulted in elevated protein levels of both active RAS (Ras-GTP) and its downstream signaling molecule, phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (p-ERK). The elevated levels of these two proteins are similar to the cells transfected with the KRAS-G12V mutant construct (Fig. 2). To further demonstrate the biological effect of 10G11 and 11GA12 KRAS mutants, NIH3T3 cells which stably transfected with empty vector, KRAS-WT, KRAS-G12V, 10G11 or 11GA12 mutant were prepared. Although NIH3T3 stable transfectants showed similar proliferation rate in MTT assay (data not shown), they have apparent differences in anchorage-independent growth property. We demonstrated in soft-agar colony formation assay that only a few number of colonies of the cells transfected with either empty vector or KRAS-wild type expression vector were observed. In contrast, more colonies were counted in all three transfectants with mutant KRAS and the differences were statistically significant compared with cells transfected with KRAS-wild type (Fig. 3). Furthermore, the colony sizes of the mutant KRAS transfectants were, in general, bigger than that in KRAS-wild type transfectant. To assess the in vivo tumorigenicity of novel KRAS variants, NIH3T3 transfectants containing empty vector or different KRAS mutants were injected subcutaneously into the dorsal flank of Balb/c nude mice. Compared with KRAS wild type and empty vector controls, KRAS 10G11 and 11GA12 significantly enhanced in vivo tumor growth as showed in Figure 4. Collectively, these observations suggested that both newly identified KRAS mutants could activate the Raf-MEK-ERK pathway by elevating RAS-GTP level and contribute in vitro and in vivo cell transformation.

Figure 2.KRAS insertion mutants activated RAS signaling by enhancing cellular accumulation of active RAS (RAS-GTP) and activating p-ERK. NIH3T3 and 293FT cells were transfected with KRAS mutants, and RAS-GTP protein in the cell extract were immunoprecipitated with agarose beads containing Ras binding domain of Raf-1. Protein levels in both whole cell extracts (pan-RAS and pERK) and precipitated samples (RAS-GTP) were analyzed by western blot analysis as indicated. Representative results from 3 independent experiments were shown.

Figure 3.KRAS insertion mutants promoted anchorage-independent growth in soft agar. NIH3T3 cells stably transfected with pcDNA3.1 empty vector (EV), wild-type KRAS (WT), G12V KRAS mutant (G12V), 10G11 and 11GA12 mutants were cultured in soft agar for analysis. Representative microscopic pictures of colony from each transfectant were taken (Magnification, 400×). The number of colony in each transfectant was plot in the bar chart and the results shown were mean and standard deviation from three independent experiments. The P value of < 0.05 and < 0.001 were denoted as * and ** respectively.

Figure 4.KRAS insertion mutants promoted in vivo growth of NIH3T3 cells. In vivo tumorgenic assay in nude mice showed that tumors formed in the sites implanted with NIH3T3 cells expressing KRAS mutants (G12V, 10G11, or 11GA12) were consistently larger than that implanted with wild-type KRAS (WT) and empty vector (EV) controls. By western blotting, the expression of KRAS protein in the NIH3T3 transfectants and tumors dissected from the xenografts (T1–T5) was detected.

Figure 2.KRAS insertion mutants activated RAS signaling by enhancing cellular accumulation of active RAS (RAS-GTP) and activating p-ERK. NIH3T3 and 293FT cells were transfected with KRAS mutants, and RAS-GTP protein in the cell extract were immunoprecipitated with agarose beads containing Ras binding domain of Raf-1. Protein levels in both whole cell extracts (pan-RAS and pERK) and precipitated samples (RAS-GTP) were analyzed by western blot analysis as indicated. Representative results from 3 independent experiments were shown. Figure 3.KRAS insertion mutants promoted anchorage-independent growth in soft agar. NIH3T3 cells stably transfected with pcDNA3.1 empty vector (EV), wild-type KRAS (WT), G12V KRAS mutant (G12V), 10G11 and 11GA12 mutants were cultured in soft agar for analysis. Representative microscopic pictures of colony from each transfectant were taken (Magnification, 400×). The number of colony in each transfectant was plot in the bar chart and the results shown were mean and standard deviation from three independent experiments. The P value of < 0.05 and < 0.001 were denoted as * and ** respectively. Figure 4.KRAS insertion mutants promoted in vivo growth of NIH3T3 cells. In vivo tumorgenic assay in nude mice showed that tumors formed in the sites implanted with NIH3T3 cells expressing KRAS mutants (G12V, 10G11, or 11GA12) were consistently larger than that implanted with wild-type KRAS (WT) and empty vector (EV) controls. By western blotting, the expression of KRAS protein in the NIH3T3 transfectants and tumors dissected from the xenografts (T1–T5) was detected.

Discussion

In the current study, we report the KRAS mutation frequency in a large cohort of patients with colorectal cancer in Hong Kong. KRAS mutation is found in 44.5% (670 out of 1506) of colorectal cancers. The mutation rate is similar to KRAS studies previously reported.- Table 4 summarized the KRAS mutation rates and the distribution of mutants in representative studies. Codon 12 is the most common KRAS mutation and the most frequently found mutation is G12D (35% of all mutations found). Our data demonstrate the predominance of KRAS-mutant carcinoma in right colon and in female patients. This is in keeping with some previous reports although other studies might not have demonstrated such relationship., The preference of site of KRAS mutation might be correlate with the different molecular pathways involved in right and left side colon CRCs. The right and left side colon cancers have been considered as distinct tumor entities because of their epidemiological, clinicopathologic, and molecular biologic features. Right side colon cancer was found to be associated with female, older age, advanced stage, and poorly differentiated mucinous histology.- Higher rates of microsatellite instability and KRAS mutations were common molecular events found in right side colon cancer., Whereas the left side tumor were more common to be chromosomal instable and harbor more TP53 mutation.- The reason for the observed differences between left and right side colon adenocarcinoma remains unclear. It is likely to be multifactorial and complex including embryologic origin, and the effect of chemical and bacterial luminal microenvironments. Moreover, we have reported the predominant KRAS mutations in left colon are located in codon 12 and right colon in codon 13. This finding is different from a large population-based study which found significantly more codon-12 mutation cases in proximal (right colon) than distal (left colon) tumors (29.1% vs 20.5%; P < 0.01). Another study also showed rectosigmoid tumor (left colon) had the highest frequency of codon 13 mutations. There is no consistent trend, further study is necessary.

Table 4. Comparison of KRAS mutation distribution in reported series

StudiesCurrent studyCOSMIC databaseRosty 201323Imamura 201241De Roock 201042Chang 200943Karapetis 200844Amado 20087Brink 200331Samowitz 200021Andreyev 199811
n =150617316776126174722839442773714162214
Mutation rate %44.534.92835.836.336.441.643.136.831.837.7
Relative mutation distribution (%) by codon
Codon 1275.179.38774.669.369.963.884.27077.954
Codon 1319.117.61325.420.125.311.715.821.622.116.7
Codon 612.50.58  5.31.2     
Codon 1462.70.19  52.4     
Relative mutation distribution (%) by nucleotide substitution
G12D37.63516135.227.4 35.73826.131.130.6
G12V20.021.59520.819.8 28.121.724.421.423.4
G12C6.78.3449.67.3  7.65.99.5 
G12S4.96.3122.66.3  7.65.66.8 
G12A4.36.7204.46.9  8.25.63.5 
G12R1.51.181.81.7  1.62.40.7 
G13D18.817.411024.120.1 11.715.820.220.816.7
G13C0.3 30.7    0.30.4 
Q61H1.30.3  2.3      
Q61L0.70.2  1      
Q61R0.30.1  1.3      
A146T2.70.2  5      
We report two rare in-frame insertion mutations in this study, c.30_31insGGA: p.G10_A11insG (duplication of codon 10) and c.33_34insGGAGCT:p.A11_G12insGA (duplication of codon 10–11). In-frame Insertion mutations in KRAS are rarely reported. Almost all reported KRAS in-frame insertions are tandem duplications. Three-nucleotide insertions resulting in codon 9, codon 10, and codon 12 duplications have been reported in colorectal cancer and leukemia.,- A Netherland cohort study found a duplication of six nucleotides in a colorectal tumor, leading to two additional amino acids added in codon 9 of KRAS. A 15-bp insertion in exon 3 that resulted in tandem duplication of codons 62–66 has been found in a case of primary lung adenocarcinoma. Another study also reported the identical 15-bp in-frame insertion mutation in a colorectal carcinoma. Wild-type KRAS regulate cellular growth and differentiation by cycling between inactive GDP-bound form (Ras-GDP) and active GTP-bound form (Ras-GTP). Mutant KRAS is defective in intrinsic GTP hydrolysis. Therefore, it is accumulated in cells in active GTP-bound form, resulting in constitutive activation of downstream signaling through effector proteins. Both insertion mutations found in the current study (10G11 and 11GA12) affect the phosphate-binding loop (codon 10–16) of KRAS. Our in vitro functional analyses have confirmed that similar to the KRAS mutant G12V, both rare mutants enhance the cellular accumulation of active RAS (Ras-GTP), and activate the Raf-MEK-ERK pathway. Using soft agar assays, we demonstrate the ability of both insertion variants in driving in vitro cell transformation. We also show that both insertion mutants demonstrate enhanced tumorigenicity in nude mice. Our finding is concordant with previous in vivo analysis of KRAS 10Gly11 mutation in acute leukemia which showed duplication of amino acid residue in codon 12 could lead to the activation of KRAS. In addition, another RAS protein member, HRAS with an insertion mutation in codon 12 was reported to gain the ability in cell transformation. These results suggest that both point mutation and insertion mutation within codon 12 and sites nearby could activate RAS protein through interrupting the GTP binding site of RAS family protein. In summary, this study has provided a KRAS mutation database in colorectal cancer of local Chinese population and the correlation between KRAS status with gender and primary site in the colon. Furthermore, we report the identification and characterization of two rare KRAS insertion mutations. In vitro and in vivo functional studies confirm the oncogenic properties of these insertion mutations. KRAS mutations beyond the “hotspots” can be oncogenic by conveying selective growth advantage to the cells. These mutations might potentially contribute to primary resistance for anti-EGFR mAb targeted therapy. The clinical implication for these mutations requires further validation.

Materials and Methods

Patient sample

A total of 1506 consecutive colorectal adenocarcinoma specimens sent for KRAS mutational analysis in Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong between 2008 and 2012 were included in this study. The study protocol was approved by the Joint CUHK-NTE Clinical Research Ethics Committee, Hong Kong.

Tumor DNA extraction

The location of tumor cells in the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue were first marked on the standard H&E-stained histological slides. Subsequently, the corresponding tumor tissues on the unstained glass slide were microdissected manually for DNA extraction using QIAamp DNA tissue mini kit with standard procedure (Qiagen).

Sequencing analysis

Mutational hot spots including KRAS codons 12, 13, 61, and 146 were investigated by PCR-direct sequencing. PCR reactions were performed using primers listed in Table 5. Cycling sequencing reaction of the PCR fragments was performed with BigDye Terminator system (Applied Biosystems) using primers from both directions. The sequencing results were analyzed with the ABI PRISM® 3130XL Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). The data was collected and analyzed using Applied Biosystems sequencing analysis software.

Table 5. The sequences of oligonucleotides used in this study

PCR primersForward sequenceReverse sequence
KRAS codon 12/13GTATTAACCT TATGTGTGAC AGTCCTGCACC AGTAATATGC
KRAS codon 61TGCACTGTAA TAATCCAGAC TGTGTGCACTGTAA TAATCCAGAC TGTG
KRAS codon 146TCTGAAGATG TACCTATGGT CCTAGTAAGAAGCAAT GCCCTCTCAA
Mutagenesis primers  
KRAS-WT5′-GGTAGTTGGA GCTGGTGGCG TAGGCAAGA-3′5′- TCTTGCCTAC GCCACCAGCT CCAACTACC-3′
KRAS-10G115′-GTGGTAGTTG GAGGAGCTGG TGGCGTAGGC AAG-3′5′-CTTGCCTACG CCACCAGCTC CTCCAACTAC CAC-3′
KRAS-11GA125′-GGTAGTTGGA GCTGGAGCTG GTGGCGTAGG CAAG-3′5′-CTTGCCTACG CCACCAGCTC CAGCTCCAAC TACC-3′

Detection of the precise sequence of the rare mutation

PCR product corresponding to KRAS exon 1 was amplified from the patient genomic DNA and subsequently cloned using the TOPO-TA Cloning kit (Invitrogen). Ten colonies of each transformation were randomly selected for sequencing analysis.

Cell culture and transfection

Human embryonic kidney cells (293FT) and mouse embryonic fibroblast cells (NIH3T3) were obtained from Invitrogen and American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) respectively. Both cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium plus 10% FBS (Gibco, Invitrogen). Transfection of 293FT and NIH3T3 cells were performed using LipofectamineTM LTX reagent (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s protocol.

Site-direct mutagenesis and active RAS measurement

Full-length of KRAS cDNA was cut from pBabe K-Ras 12V vector (Addgene plasmid 12544) and cloned into pcDNA3.1 (+) expression vector (Invitrogen) via BamH1 and Xba1 restriction sites. Corresponding KRAS mutations were introduced into the expression vector using QuickChange® II Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (Stratagene). The desired mutations in each construct were finally confirmed by direct sequencing. The primer sequences for mutagenesis were listed in Table 5. Ras Activation Assay Kit (Millipore) was used to measure the level of active RAS (RAS-GTP) after transient transfection of corresponding plasmid into the cell lines. In brief, 0.5 mg of cell extract was immunoprecipitated with agarose beads containing human Ras Binding Domain (RBD, residues 1–149) of Raf-1. After washing, the beads were mixed with protein loading buffer and 10% of the mixture was electrophoresed by 12% SDS-PAGE for western blot analysis as previously described., The primary antibodies used were pan-RAS (RAS10, Millipore; 1:2000) and p-ERK1/2 (9102, Cell Signaling; 1:1000). HRP conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody used was purchased from DAKO (1:20000 dilution).

Soft agar colony formation assay

NIH3T3 cells transfected with corresponding KRAS expression plasmids were selected in culture medium containing 400 μg/mL of G418 (Invitrogen) for one month before preparing colony formation assay. In the assay, culture medium containing 0.7% agarose was set as a bottom layer in 6-well dishes. A total of 3000 cells, which mixed with culture medium containing 0.35% agarose, were added over the bottom layer. After 25 d of incubation, colonies were stained with 0.005% crystal violet overnight and were counted under dissection microscope. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.

In vivo tumorigenicity

NIH3T3 transfectants (1 × 106 cells suspended in 0.1 mL phosphate-buffered saline), containing empty vector or different KRAS mutant, were injected subcutaneously into the dorsal flank of five 5-wk-old male Balb/c nude mice. The tumor volume was determined as previously described. All experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Chinese University of Hong Kong.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of two times two contingency tables of categorical variables was performed using the Chi-square test or Fisher exact test, as appropriate. The t test was performed to compare continuous variables between two groups. All statistical analyses were performed by using statistical program SPSS version 16.0. A two-tailed P value of <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.
  44 in total

1.  Relationship of Ki-ras mutations in colon cancers to tumor location, stage, and survival: a population-based study.

Authors:  W S Samowitz; K Curtin; D Schaffer; M Robertson; M Leppert; M L Slattery
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  A novel somatic K-Ras mutation in juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia.

Authors:  C Reimann; M Arola; M Bierings; A Karow; M M van den Heuvel-Eibrink; H Hasle; C M Niemeyer; C P Kratz
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 11.528

3.  KRAS mutational status in Japanese patients with colorectal cancer: results from a nationwide, multicenter, cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Toshiaki Watanabe; Takayuki Yoshino; Hiroyuki Uetake; Kentaro Yamazaki; Megumi Ishiguro; Tatsuo Kurokawa; Nagahiro Saijo; Yasuo Ohashi; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Comparison of 17,641 patients with right- and left-sided colon cancer: differences in epidemiology, perioperative course, histology, and survival.

Authors:  Frank Benedix; Rainer Kube; Frank Meyer; Uwe Schmidt; Ingo Gastinger; Hans Lippert
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Colorectal carcinomas with KRAS mutation are associated with distinctive morphological and molecular features.

Authors:  Christophe Rosty; Joanne P Young; Michael D Walsh; Mark Clendenning; Rhiannon J Walters; Sally Pearson; Erika Pavluk; Belinda Nagler; David Pakenas; Jeremy R Jass; Mark A Jenkins; Aung Ko Win; Melissa C Southey; Susan Parry; John L Hopper; Graham G Giles; Elizabeth Williamson; Dallas R English; Daniel D Buchanan
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 6.  KRAS mutations and sensitivity to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in colorectal cancer: practical application of patient selection.

Authors:  Antonio Jimeno; Wells A Messersmith; Fred R Hirsch; Wilbur A Franklin; S Gail Eckhardt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-01-05       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Are there two sides to colorectal cancer?

Authors:  Barry Iacopetta
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Genetic evidence for lineage-related and differentiation stage-related contribution of somatic PTPN11 mutations to leukemogenesis in childhood acute leukemia.

Authors:  Marco Tartaglia; Simone Martinelli; Giovanni Cazzaniga; Viviana Cordeddu; Ivano Iavarone; Monica Spinelli; Chiara Palmi; Claudio Carta; Andrea Pession; Maurizio Aricò; Giuseppe Masera; Giuseppe Basso; Mariella Sorcini; Bruce D Gelb; Andrea Biondi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2004-02-24       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Fast simultaneous detection of K-RAS mutations in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ya-Sian Chang; Kun-Tu Yeh; Tien-Jye Chang; Connie Chai; Hsiu-Chin Lu; Nicholas C Hsu; Jan-Gowth Chang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations and the loss of PTEN expression in Chinese patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Chen Mao; Junhua Zhou; Zuyao Yang; Yafang Huang; Xinyin Wu; Hong Shen; Jinling Tang; Qing Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Ras and Rap1: A tale of two GTPases.

Authors:  Seema Shah; Ethan J Brock; Kyungmin Ji; Raymond R Mattingly
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 15.707

2.  Novel reversible selective inhibitor of nuclear export shows that CRM1 is a target in colorectal cancer cells.

Authors:  Mingshan Niu; Yulong Chong; Yan Han; Xuejiao Liu
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 4.742

3.  Brain metastases in colorectal cancer: prognostic factors and survival analysis.

Authors:  Luis Del Carpio Huerta; Anna Cristina Virgili Manrique; Justyna Szafranska; Marta Martin-Richard; David Paez Lopez-Bravo; Ana Sebio Garcia; Iñigo Espinosa Mariscal; Paula Gomila Pons; Marta Andres Granyo; Andres Barba Joaquin; Agusti Barnadas Molins; Maria Tobeña Puyal
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Characterizing the patterns of clonal selection in circulating tumor DNA from patients with colorectal cancer refractory to anti-EGFR treatment.

Authors:  M P Morelli; M J Overman; A Dasari; S M A Kazmi; T Mazard; E Vilar; V K Morris; M S Lee; D Herron; C Eng; J Morris; B K Kee; F Janku; F L Deaton; C Garrett; D Maru; F Diehl; P Angenendt; S Kopetz
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  KRAS Testing, Tumor Location, and Survival in Patients With Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: SEER 2010-2013.

Authors:  Mary E Charlton; Amanda R Kahl; Alissa A Greenbaum; Jordan J Karlitz; Chi Lin; Charles F Lynch; Vivien W Chen
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 6.  Different treatment strategies and molecular features between right-sided and left-sided colon cancers.

Authors:  Hong Shen; Jiao Yang; Qing Huang; Meng-Jie Jiang; Yi-Nuo Tan; Jian-Fei Fu; Li-Zhen Zhu; Xue-Feng Fang; Ying Yuan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Broad Detection of Alterations Predicted to Confer Lack of Benefit From EGFR Antibodies or Sensitivity to Targeted Therapy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Andrew Rankin; Samuel J Klempner; Rachel Erlich; James X Sun; Axel Grothey; Marwan Fakih; Thomas J George; Jeeyun Lee; Jeffrey S Ross; Philip J Stephens; Vincent A Miller; Siraj M Ali; Alexa B Schrock
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-09-28

8.  Racial differences in survival and response to therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A secondary analysis of CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance A151931).

Authors:  Rebecca A Snyder; Jun He; Jennifer Le-Rademacher; Fang-Shu Ou; Andrew B Dodge; Tyler J Zemla; Electra D Paskett; George J Chang; Federico Innocenti; Charles Blanke; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Blasé N Polite; Alan P Venook
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 6.921

9.  Unique clinicopathologic and genetic alteration features in early onset colorectal carcinoma compared with age-related colorectal carcinoma: a large cohort next generation sequence analysis.

Authors:  David Escobar; Ryan Jones; Juehua Gao; Leyu Sun; Jie Liao; Guang-Yu Yang
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 3.526

10.  Analyses of clinicopathological, molecular, and prognostic associations of KRAS codon 61 and codon 146 mutations in colorectal cancer: cohort study and literature review.

Authors:  Yu Imamura; Paul Lochhead; Mai Yamauchi; Aya Kuchiba; Zhi Rong Qian; Xiaoyun Liao; Reiko Nishihara; Seungyoun Jung; Kana Wu; Katsuhiko Nosho; Yaoyu E Wang; Shouyong Peng; Adam J Bass; Kevin M Haigis; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Andrew T Chan; Charles S Fuchs; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 27.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.