Literature DB >> 27682134

Broad Detection of Alterations Predicted to Confer Lack of Benefit From EGFR Antibodies or Sensitivity to Targeted Therapy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer.

Andrew Rankin1, Samuel J Klempner2, Rachel Erlich1, James X Sun1, Axel Grothey3, Marwan Fakih4, Thomas J George5, Jeeyun Lee6, Jeffrey S Ross1,7, Philip J Stephens1, Vincent A Miller1, Siraj M Ali1, Alexa B Schrock8.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A KRAS mutation represented the first genomic biomarker to predict lack of benefit from anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody therapy in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Expanded RAS testing has further refined the treatment approach, but understanding of genomic alterations underlying primary and acquired resistance is limited and further study is needed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively analyzed 4,422 clinical samples from patients with advanced CRC, using hybrid-capture based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) at the request of the individual treating physicians. Comparison with prior molecular testing results, when available, was performed to assess concordance.
RESULTS: We identified a RAS/RAF pathway mutation or amplification in 62% of cases, including samples harboring KRAS mutations outside of the codon 12/13 hotspot region in 6.4% of cases. Among cases with KRAS non-codon 12/13 alterations for which prior test results were available, 79 of 90 (88%) were not identified by focused testing. Of 1,644 RAS/RAF wild-type cases analyzed by CGP, 31% harbored a genomic alteration (GA) associated with resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in advanced CRC including mutations in PIK3CA, PTEN, EGFR, and ERBB2. We also identified other targetable GA, including novel kinase fusions, receptor tyrosine kinase amplification, activating point mutations, as well as microsatellite instability.
CONCLUSION: Extended genomic profiling reliably detects alterations associated with lack of benefit to anti-EGFR therapy in advanced CRC, while simultaneously identifying alterations potentially important in guiding treatment. The use of CGP during the course of clinical care allows for the refined selection of appropriate targeted therapies and clinical trials, increasing the chance of clinical benefit and avoiding therapeutic futility. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) detects diverse genomic alterations associated with lack of benefit to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), as well as targetable alterations in many other genes. This includes detection of a broad spectrum of activating KRAS alterations frequently missed by focused molecular hotspot testing, as well as other RAS/RAF pathway alterations, mutations shown to disrupt antibody binding, RTK activating point mutations, amplifications, and rearrangements, and activating alterations in downstream effectors including PI3K and MEK1. The use of CGP in clinical practice is critical to guide appropriate selection of targeted therapies for patients with advanced CRC. ©AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; Cetuximab; Colon cancer; Epidermal growth factor receptor; Genomic profiling; KRAS

Year:  2016        PMID: 27682134      PMCID: PMC5189622          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  55 in total

1.  Identification of a mutation in the extracellular domain of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor conferring cetuximab resistance in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Clara Montagut; Alba Dalmases; Beatriz Bellosillo; Marta Crespo; Silvia Pairet; Mar Iglesias; Marta Salido; Manuel Gallen; Scot Marsters; Siao Ping Tsai; André Minoche; Somasekar Seshagiri; Seshagiri Somasekar; Sergi Serrano; Heinz Himmelbauer; Joaquim Bellmunt; Ana Rovira; Jeff Settleman; Francesc Bosch; Joan Albanell
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-01-22       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Efficacy according to biomarker status of cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the OPUS study.

Authors:  C Bokemeyer; I Bondarenko; J T Hartmann; F de Braud; G Schuch; A Zubel; I Celik; M Schlichting; P Koralewski
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Emergence of Multiple EGFR Extracellular Mutations during Cetuximab Treatment in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Sabrina Arena; Beatriz Bellosillo; Giulia Siravegna; Alejandro Martínez; Israel Cañadas; Luca Lazzari; Noelia Ferruz; Mariangela Russo; Sandra Misale; Iria González; Mar Iglesias; Elena Gavilan; Giorgio Corti; Sebastijan Hobor; Giovanni Crisafulli; Marta Salido; Juan Sánchez; Alba Dalmases; Joaquim Bellmunt; Gianni De Fabritiis; Ana Rovira; Federica Di Nicolantonio; Joan Albanell; Alberto Bardelli; Clara Montagut
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status.

Authors:  Eric Van Cutsem; Claus-Henning Köhne; István Láng; Gunnar Folprecht; Marek P Nowacki; Stefano Cascinu; Igor Shchepotin; Joan Maurel; David Cunningham; Sabine Tejpar; Michael Schlichting; Angela Zubel; Ilhan Celik; Philippe Rougier; Fortunato Ciardiello
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  PI3KCA/PTEN deregulation contributes to impaired responses to cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  F Perrone; A Lampis; M Orsenigo; M Di Bartolomeo; A Gevorgyan; M Losa; M Frattini; C Riva; S Andreola; E Bajetta; L Bertario; E Leo; M A Pierotti; S Pilotti
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: updated overall survival and molecular subgroup analyses of the open-label, phase 3 TRIBE study.

Authors:  Chiara Cremolini; Fotios Loupakis; Carlotta Antoniotti; Cristiana Lupi; Elisa Sensi; Sara Lonardi; Silvia Mezi; Gianluca Tomasello; Monica Ronzoni; Alberto Zaniboni; Giuseppe Tonini; Chiara Carlomagno; Giacomo Allegrini; Silvana Chiara; Mauro D'Amico; Cristina Granetto; Marina Cazzaniga; Luca Boni; Gabriella Fontanini; Alfredo Falcone
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  KRAS gene amplification in colorectal cancer and impact on response to EGFR-targeted therapy.

Authors:  Emanuele Valtorta; Sandra Misale; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Iris D Nagtegaal; François Paraf; Calogero Lauricella; Valentina Dimartino; Sebastijan Hobor; Bart Jacobs; Cristiana Ercolani; Simona Lamba; Elisa Scala; Silvio Veronese; Pierre Laurent-Puig; Salvatore Siena; Sabine Tejpar; Marcella Mottolese; Cornelis J A Punt; Marcello Gambacorta; Alberto Bardelli; Federica Di Nicolantonio
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Identification of Targetable Kinase Alterations in Patients with Colorectal Carcinoma That are Preferentially Associated with Wild-Type RAS/RAF.

Authors:  Jaclyn F Hechtman; Ahmet Zehir; Rona Yaeger; Lu Wang; Sumit Middha; Tao Zheng; David M Hyman; David Solit; Maria E Arcila; Laetitia Borsu; Jinru Shia; Efsevia Vakiani; Leonard Saltz; Marc Ladanyi
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 5.852

9.  Clinical Response to Sorafenib in a Patient with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and FLT3 Amplification.

Authors:  Raphael Brandão Moreira; Renata D'Alpino Peixoto; Marcelo Rocha de Sousa Cruz
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol       Date:  2015-02-11

10.  KRAS codon 61, 146 and BRAF mutations predict resistance to cetuximab plus irinotecan in KRAS codon 12 and 13 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  F Loupakis; A Ruzzo; C Cremolini; B Vincenzi; L Salvatore; D Santini; G Masi; I Stasi; E Canestrari; E Rulli; I Floriani; K Bencardino; N Galluccio; V Catalano; G Tonini; M Magnani; G Fontanini; F Basolo; A Falcone; F Graziano
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  18 in total

1.  Hybrid Capture-Based Genomic Profiling of Circulating Tumor DNA from Patients with Advanced Cancers of the Gastrointestinal Tract or Anus.

Authors:  Alexa B Schrock; Dean Pavlick; Samuel J Klempner; Jon H Chung; Brady Forcier; Allison Welsh; Lauren Young; Bryan Leyland-Jones; Rodolfo Bordoni; Richard D Carvajal; Joseph Chao; Razelle Kurzrock; Jason K Sicklick; Jeffrey S Ross; Philip J Stephens; Craig Devoe; Fadi Braiteh; Siraj M Ali; Vincent A Miller
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Colorectal cancer genomics and designing rational trials.

Authors:  Sebastian Mondaca; Rona Yaeger
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-05

Review 3.  Mechanisms of Innate and Acquired Resistance to Anti-EGFR Therapy: A Review of Current Knowledge with a Focus on Rechallenge Therapies.

Authors:  Christine M Parseghian; Stefania Napolitano; Jonathan M Loree; Scott Kopetz
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Clinical and analytical validation of FoundationOne®CDx, a comprehensive genomic profiling assay for solid tumors.

Authors:  Coren A Milbury; James Creeden; Wai-Ki Yip; David L Smith; Varun Pattani; Kristi Maxwell; Bethany Sawchyn; Ole Gjoerup; Wei Meng; Joel Skoletsky; Alvin D Concepcion; Yanhua Tang; Xiaobo Bai; Ninad Dewal; Pei Ma; Shannon T Bailey; James Thornton; Dean C Pavlick; Garrett M Frampton; Daniel Lieber; Jared White; Christine Burns; Christine Vietz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Prevalence, prognosis and predictive status of HER2 amplification in anti-EGFR-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  G Wang; Y He; Y Sun; W Wang; X Qian; X Yu; Y Pan
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-10-05       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Genomic profiling of cell-free circulating tumor DNA in patients with colorectal cancer and its fidelity to the genomics of the tumor biopsy.

Authors:  Gerald Li; Dean Pavlick; Jon H Chung; Todd Bauer; Bradford A Tan; Julio Peguero; Patrick Ward; Andre Kallab; Jose Bufill; Anthony Hoffman; Ahad Sadiq; Jeff Edenfield; Jie He; Matthew Cooke; Jason Hughes; Brady Forcier; Michelle Nahas; Phil Stephens; Siraj M Ali; Alexa B Schrock; Jeffrey S Ross; Vincent A Miller; Jeffrey P Gregg
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-10

7.  Genomic Profiling of Small-Bowel Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Alexa B Schrock; Craig E Devoe; Robert McWilliams; James Sun; Thomas Aparicio; Philip J Stephens; Jeffrey S Ross; Richard Wilson; Vincent A Miller; Siraj M Ali; Michael J Overman
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 31.777

8.  Immune profiling of pituitary tumors reveals variations in immune infiltration and checkpoint molecule expression.

Authors:  Yu Mei; Wenya Linda Bi; James Agolia; Changchen Hu; Alexandra M Giantini Larsen; David M Meredith; Sally Al Abdulmohsen; Tejus Bale; Gavin P Dunn; Malak Abedalthagafi; Ian F Dunn
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.107

9.  Comprehensive NGS Panel Validation for the Identification of Actionable Alterations in Adult Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Paula Martínez-Fernández; Patricia Pose; Raquel Dolz-Gaitón; Arantxa García; Inmaculada Trigo-Sánchez; Enrique Rodríguez-Zarco; MJose Garcia-Ruiz; Ibon Barba; Marta Izquierdo-García; Jennifer Valero-Garcia; Carlos Ruiz; Marián Lázaro; Paula Carbonell; Pablo Gargallo; Carlos Méndez; Juan José Ríos-Martín; Alberto Palmeiro-Uriach; Natalia Camarasa-Lillo; Jerónimo Forteza-Vila; Inés Calabria
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-04-29

10.  Protein biomarkers predictive for response to anti-EGFR treatment in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Astrid Lièvre; Bérèngere Ouine; Jim Canet; Aurélie Cartier; Yael Amar; Wulfran Cacheux; Odette Mariani; Rosine Guimbaud; Janick Selves; Thierry Lecomte; Serge Guyetant; Ivan Bieche; Frédérique Berger; Leanne de Koning
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.