Literature DB >> 24639594

Intellectual property rights and innovation: Evidence from the human genome.

Heidi L Williams1.   

Abstract

Do intellectual property (IP) rights on existing technologies hinder subsequent innovation? Using newly-collected data on the sequencing of the human genome by the public Human Genome Project and the private firm Celera, this paper estimates the impact of Celera's gene-level IP on subsequent scientific research and product development. Genes initially sequenced by Celera were held with IP for up to two years, but moved into the public domain once re-sequenced by the public effort. Across a range of empirical specifications, I find evidence that Celera's IP led to reductions in subsequent scientific research and product development on the order of 20 to 30 percent. Taken together, these results suggest that Celera's short-term IP had persistent negative effects on subsequent innovation relative to a counterfactual of Celera genes having always been in the public domain.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 24639594      PMCID: PMC3955392          DOI: 10.1086/669706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Polit Econ        ISSN: 0022-3808


  17 in total

Review 1.  Genomics in the public domain: strategy and policy.

Authors:  R S Eisenberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Bermuda rules: community spirit, with teeth.

Authors:  E Marshall
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-02-16       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Effects of patents and licenses on the provision of clinical genetic testing services.

Authors:  Mildred K Cho; Samantha Illangasekare; Meredith A Weaver; Debra G B Leonard; Jon F Merz
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  Genomics. Defining genes in the genomics era.

Authors:  Michael Snyder; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Science and law. View from the bench: patents and material transfers.

Authors:  John P Walsh; Charlene Cho; Wesley M Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Key Internet genetics resources for the clinician.

Authors:  Wendy R Uhlmann; Alan E Guttmacher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  NIH to produce a 'working draft' of the genome by 2001.

Authors:  E Marshall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-09-18       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  A new five-year plan for the U.S. Human Genome Project.

Authors:  F Collins; D Galas
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-10-01       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Whole-genome shotgun assembly and comparison of human genome assemblies.

Authors:  Sorin Istrail; Granger G Sutton; Liliana Florea; Aaron L Halpern; Clark M Mobarry; Ross Lippert; Brian Walenz; Hagit Shatkay; Ian Dew; Jason R Miller; Michael J Flanigan; Nathan J Edwards; Randall Bolanos; Daniel Fasulo; Bjarni V Halldorsson; Sridhar Hannenhalli; Russell Turner; Shibu Yooseph; Fu Lu; Deborah R Nusskern; Bixiong Chris Shue; Xiangqun Holly Zheng; Fei Zhong; Arthur L Delcher; Daniel H Huson; Saul A Kravitz; Laurent Mouchard; Knut Reinert; Karin A Remington; Andrew G Clark; Michael S Waterman; Evan E Eichler; Mark D Adams; Michael W Hunkapiller; Eugene W Myers; J Craig Venter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  New goals for the U.S. Human Genome Project: 1998-2003.

Authors:  F S Collins; A Patrinos; E Jordan; A Chakravarti; R Gesteland; L Walters
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-10-23       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  28 in total

1.  More for the research dollar.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Furman; Fiona Murray; Scott Stern
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The Bermuda Triangle: The Pragmatics, Policies, and Principles for Data Sharing in the History of the Human Genome Project.

Authors:  Kathryn Maxson Jones; Rachel A Ankeny; Robert Cook-Deegan
Journal:  J Hist Biol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.326

Review 3.  The fate and future of patents on human genes and genetic diagnostic methods.

Authors:  Isabelle Huys; Gert Matthijs; Geertrui Van Overwalle
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Gene patenting--the Supreme Court finally speaks.

Authors:  Aaron S Kesselheim; Robert M Cook-Deegan; David E Winickoff; Michelle M Mello
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  An empirical review of major legislation affecting drug development: past experiences, effects, and unintended consequences.

Authors:  Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  The European Open Science Cloud and commercialization.

Authors:  Helen Yu
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Raising financing through strategic timing.

Authors:  Elicia Maine; V J Thomas
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 39.213

8.  Science publishing: Open access must enable open use.

Authors:  Cameron Neylon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Perspective: Science is still too closed.

Authors:  Aled Edwards
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The Promises and Pitfalls of Genoeconomics*

Authors:  Daniel J Benjamin; David Cesarini; Christopher F Chabris; Edward L Glaeser; David I Laibson; Vilmundur Guðnason; Tamara B Harris; Lenore J Launer; Shaun Purcell; Albert Vernon Smith; Magnus Johannesson; Patrik K E Magnusson; Jonathan P Beauchamp; Nicholas A Christakis; Craig S Atwood; Benjamin Hebert; Jeremy Freese; Robert M Hauser; Taissa S Hauser; Alexander Grankvist; Christina M Hultman; Paul Lichtenstein
Journal:  Annu Rev Econom       Date:  2012-06-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.