Literature DB >> 12552073

Effects of patents and licenses on the provision of clinical genetic testing services.

Mildred K Cho1, Samantha Illangasekare, Meredith A Weaver, Debra G B Leonard, Jon F Merz.   

Abstract

The growth of patents that include genetic sequences has been accompanied by concern about their impact on the ability of physicians to provide clinical genetic testing services and to perform research. Therefore, we conducted a survey of clinical laboratory directors that perform DNA-based genetic tests to examine potential effects. We performed a telephone survey between July and September in 2001 of all laboratory directors in the United States who were members of the Association for Molecular Pathology or who were listed on the GENETESTS:org website. One hundred thirty-two of 211 (63%) laboratory directors were interviewed. Ten of these were excluded because they did not conduct DNA-based genetic tests. Almost all performed genetic tests for clinical purposes. Half performed tests for research purposes as well. Twenty-five percent of respondents reported that they had stopped performing a clinical genetic test because of a patent or license. Fifty-three percent of respondents reported deciding not to develop a new clinical genetic test because of a patent or license. In total, respondents were prevented from performing 12 genetic tests, and all of these tests were among those performed by a large number of laboratories. We found 22 patents that were relevant to the performance of these 12 tests. Fifteen of the 22 patents (68%) are held by universities or research institutes, and 13 of the 22 patents (59%) were based on research funded by the United States Government. Overall, respondents reported that their perceptions of the effects of patents on the cost, access, and development of genetic tests, or data sharing among researchers, were negative. In contrast, most respondents felt that patents did not have an effect on the quality of testing. We conclude that patents and licenses have had a significant effect on the ability of clinical laboratories to develop and provide genetic tests. Furthermore, our findings suggest that clinical geneticists feel that their research is inhibited by patents. The effects of patents and licenses on patients' access to tests, and the costs and quality thereof, remains to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12552073      PMCID: PMC1907368          DOI: 10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60444-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  5 in total

1.  Diagnostic testing fails the test.

Authors:  Jon F Merz; Antigone G Kriss; Debra G B Leonard; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The patenting of DNA.

Authors:  J J Doll
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research.

Authors:  M A Heller; R S Eisenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The case for genomic patenting.

Authors:  G Poste
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-12-07       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  How human geneticists in US view commercialization of the Human Genome Project.

Authors:  I Rabino
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 38.330

  5 in total
  44 in total

1.  Biomarker patents for diagnostics: problem or solution?

Authors:  Michael M Hopkins; Stuart Hogarth
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Open biotechnology: licenses needed.

Authors:  Yann Joly
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Are the gene-patent storm clouds dissipating? A global snapshot.

Authors:  Johnathon Liddicoat; Tess Whitton; Dianne Nicol
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 4.  The fate and future of patents on human genes and genetic diagnostic methods.

Authors:  Isabelle Huys; Gert Matthijs; Geertrui Van Overwalle
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Translating research into cancer molecular diagnostics and patents.

Authors:  M Ladanyi
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  The licensing of DNA patents by US academic institutions: an empirical survey.

Authors:  Lori Pressman; Richard Burgess; Robert M Cook-Deegan; Stephen J McCormack; Io Nami-Wolk; Melissa Soucy; LeRoy Walters
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Evidence and anecdotes: an analysis of human gene patenting controversies.

Authors:  Timothy Caulfield; Robert M Cook-Deegan; F Scott Kieff; John P Walsh
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 8.  Medical ethics for the genome world: a paper from the 2007 William Beaumont hospital symposium on molecular pathology.

Authors:  Kelly E Ormond
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 5.568

9.  The phantom menace of gene patents.

Authors:  Sibylle Gaisser; Michael M Hopkins; Kathleen Liddell; Eleni Zika; Dolores Ibarreta
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Harm, hype and evidence: ELSI research and policy guidance.

Authors:  Timothy Caulfield; Subhashini Chandrasekharan; Yann Joly; Robert Cook-Deegan
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 11.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.