Literature DB >> 24639521

Identifying and designing chemicals with minimal acute aquatic toxicity.

Jakub Kostal1, Adelina Voutchkova-Kostal2, Paul T Anastas3, Julie Beth Zimmerman4.   

Abstract

Industrial ecology has revolutionized our understanding of material stocks and flows in our economy and society. For this important discipline to have even deeper impact, we must understand the inherent nature of these materials in terms of human health and the environment. This paper focuses on methods to design synthetic chemicals to reduce their intrinsic ability to cause adverse consequence to the biosphere. Advances in the fields of computational chemistry and molecular toxicology in recent decades allow the development of predictive models that inform the design of molecules with reduced potential to be toxic to humans or the environment. The approach presented herein builds on the important work in quantitative structure-activity relationships by linking toxicological and chemical mechanistic insights to the identification of critical physical-chemical properties needed to be modified. This in silico approach yields design guidelines using boundary values for physiochemical properties. Acute aquatic toxicity serves as a model endpoint in this study. Defining value ranges for properties related to bioavailability and reactivity eliminates 99% of the chemicals in the highest concern for acute aquatic toxicity category. This approach and its future implementations are expected to yield very powerful tools for life cycle assessment practitioners and molecular designers that allow rapid assessment of multiple environmental and human health endpoints and inform modifications to minimize hazard.

Entities:  

Keywords:  green chemistry; rational design; safer chemicals; toxicity prediction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24639521      PMCID: PMC4443366          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1314991111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  22 in total

Review 1.  Life cycle assessment part 2: current impact assessment practice.

Authors:  D W Pennington; J Potting; G Finnveden; E Lindeijer; O Jolliet; T Rydberg; G Rebitzer
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 2.  Molecular modeling of organic and biomolecular systems using BOSS and MCPRO.

Authors:  William L Jorgensen; Julian Tirado-Rives
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  The material footprint of nations.

Authors:  Thomas O Wiedmann; Heinz Schandl; Manfred Lenzen; Daniel Moran; Sangwon Suh; James West; Keiichiro Kanemoto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Re-evaluation of animal numbers and costs for in vivo tests to accomplish REACH legislation requirements for chemicals - a report by the transatlantic think tank for toxicology (t(4)).

Authors:  Costanza Rovida; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.043

5.  Global in-use stocks of the rare Earth elements: a first estimate.

Authors:  Xiaoyue Du; T E Graedel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 6.  Anthropogenic cycles of the elements: a critical review.

Authors:  Wei-Qiang Chen; T E Graedel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 7.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  A QSAR for baseline toxicity: validation, domain of application, and prediction.

Authors:  Tomas Oberg
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.739

9.  Residue-based interpretation of toxicity and bioconcentration QSARs from aquatic bioassays: polar narcotic organics.

Authors:  L S McCarty; D Mackay; A D Smith; G W Ozburn; D G Dixon
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.291

Review 10.  Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict health effects of chemical substances.

Authors:  Mark T D Cronin; Joanna S Jaworska; John D Walker; Michael H I Comber; Christopher D Watts; Andrew P Worth
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  7 in total

1.  Industrial Ecology: The role of manufactured capital in sustainability.

Authors:  Helga Weisz; Sangwon Suh; T E Graedel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Toward sustainable environmental quality: Priority research questions for Europe.

Authors:  Paul J Van den Brink; Alistair B A Boxall; Lorraine Maltby; Bryan W Brooks; Murray A Rudd; Thomas Backhaus; David Spurgeon; Violaine Verougstraete; Charmaine Ajao; Gerald T Ankley; Sabine E Apitz; Kathryn Arnold; Tomas Brodin; Miguel Cañedo-Argüelles; Jennifer Chapman; Jone Corrales; Marie-Agnès Coutellec; Teresa F Fernandes; Jerker Fick; Alex T Ford; Gemma Giménez Papiol; Ksenia J Groh; Thomas H Hutchinson; Hank Kruger; Jussi V K Kukkonen; Stefania Loutseti; Stuart Marshall; Derek Muir; Manuel E Ortiz-Santaliestra; Kai B Paul; Andreu Rico; Ismael Rodea-Palomares; Jörg Römbke; Tomas Rydberg; Helmut Segner; Mathijs Smit; Cornelis A M van Gestel; Marco Vighi; Inge Werner; Elke I Zimmer; Joke van Wensem
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Toward safer multi-walled carbon nanotube design: Establishing a statistical model that relates surface charge and embryonic zebrafish mortality.

Authors:  Leanne M Gilbertson; Fjodor Melnikov; Leah C Wehmas; Paul T Anastas; Robert L Tanguay; Julie B Zimmerman
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 5.913

Review 4.  Toward Sustainable Environmental Quality: Priority Research Questions for North America.

Authors:  Anne Fairbrother; Derek Muir; Keith R Solomon; Gerald T Ankley; Murray A Rudd; Alistair B A Boxall; Jennifer N Apell; Kevin L Armbrust; Bonnie J Blalock; Sarah R Bowman; Linda M Campbell; George P Cobb; Kristin A Connors; David A Dreier; Marlene S Evans; Carol J Henry; Robert A Hoke; Magali Houde; Stephen J Klaine; Rebecca D Klaper; Sigrun A Kullik; Roman P Lanno; Charles Meyer; Mary Ann Ottinger; Elias Oziolor; Elijah J Petersen; Helen C Poynton; Pamela J Rice; Gabriela Rodriguez-Fuentes; Alan Samel; Joseph R Shaw; Jeffery A Steevens; Tim A Verslycke; Doris E Vidal-Dorsch; Scott M Weir; Peter Wilson; Bryan W Brooks
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 5.  Toxicity of nanoparticles_ challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Amall Ramanathan
Journal:  Appl Microsc       Date:  2019-04-29

6.  Structure-to-process design framework for developing safer pesticides.

Authors:  Jessica M Lewer; Zachary R Stickelman; Jessica H Huang; John F Peloquin; Jakub Kostal
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  Effective Strategies for Monitoring and Regulating Chemical Mixtures and Contaminants Sharing Pathways of Toxicity.

Authors:  Arjun K Venkatesan; Rolf U Halden
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.