Literature DB >> 7691520

Residue-based interpretation of toxicity and bioconcentration QSARs from aquatic bioassays: polar narcotic organics.

L S McCarty1, D Mackay, A D Smith, G W Ozburn, D G Dixon.   

Abstract

Bioconcentration and toxicity estimation for a group of substituted phenols often categorized as "polar narcotics" can be confounded by pH-dependent ionization. Two methods of correction for ionization were applied to toxicity data obtained by U.S. EPA-Duluth for fathead minnows exposed to 30 different phenols in 37 bioassays. Toxicity QSARs with corrected data were substantially different from those obtained with raw toxicity data. When ionization-corrected toxicity data were used in the critical body residue (CBR) estimation process previously successful with neutral narcotic organics, several categories of CBR, apparently related to different modes of toxic action, resulted. Published data on lethal CBR for substituted phenols were in general agreement, although such information is limited. Elimination half-life rate constants, estimated from nonlinear curve fitting to time-toxicity information, were relatively constant for the Duluth bioassay data, averaging 0.3 days. Half-life information for small aquatic organisms, both from toxicity- and bioconcentration-based tests in the literature, was in a similar range. Much of the relatively high variability encountered experimental data for substituted phenols may in large part be due to differences in metabolic degradation between chemicals and species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7691520     DOI: 10.1006/eesa.1993.1024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf        ISSN: 0147-6513            Impact factor:   6.291


  6 in total

1.  Identifying and designing chemicals with minimal acute aquatic toxicity.

Authors:  Jakub Kostal; Adelina Voutchkova-Kostal; Paul T Anastas; Julie Beth Zimmerman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Future needs and recommendations in the development of species sensitivity distributions: Estimating toxicity thresholds for aquatic ecological communities and assessing impacts of chemical exposures.

Authors:  Scott Belanger; Mace Barron; Peter Craig; Scott Dyer; Malyka Galay-Burgos; Mick Hamer; Stuart Marshall; Leo Posthuma; Sandy Raimondo; Paul Whitehouse
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.992

3.  Mercury toxicity to Eisenia fetida in three different soils.

Authors:  Khandaker Rayhan Mahbub; Kannan Krishnan; Ravi Naidu; Mallavarapu Megharaj
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Summary of the development the US Environmental Protection Agency's Medaka Extended One Generation Reproduction Test (MEOGRT) using data from 9 multigenerational medaka tests.

Authors:  Kevin Flynn; Doug Lothenbach; Frank Whiteman; Dean Hammermeister; Leslie W Touart; Joe Swintek; Norihisa Tatarazako; Yuta Onishi; Taisen Iguchi; Rodney Johnson
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.742

5.  Comparison of Toxicities to Vibrio fischeri and Fish Based on Discrimination of Excess Toxicity from Baseline Level.

Authors:  Xiao H Wang; Yang Yu; Tao Huang; Wei C Qin; Li M Su; Yuan H Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Chemical and toxicological characterisation of residues from offshore in-situ burning of spilled fuel oils.

Authors:  Liv-Guri Faksness; Dag Altin; Hilde Dolva; Trond Nordtug
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2022-01-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.