Literature DB >> 24636718

Partitioning of knee joint internal forces in gait is dictated by the knee adduction angle and not by the knee adduction moment.

M Adouni1, A Shirazi-Adl2.   

Abstract

Medial knee osteoarthritis is a debilitating disease. Surgical and conservative interventions are performed to manage its progression via reduction of load on the medial compartment or equivalently its surrogate measure, the external adduction moment. However, some studies have questioned a correlation between the medial load and adduction moment. Using a musculoskeletal model of the lower extremity driven by kinematics-kinetics of asymptomatic subjects at gait midstance, we aim here to quantify the relative effects of changes in the knee adduction angle versus changes in the adduction moment on the joint response and medial/lateral load partitioning. The reference adduction rotation of 1.6° is altered by ±1.5° to 3.1° and 0.1° or the knee reference adduction moment of 17Nm is varied by ±50% to 25.5Nm and 8.5Nm. Quadriceps, hamstrings and tibiofemoral contact forces substantially increased as adduction angle dropped and diminished as it increased. The medial/lateral ratio of contact forces slightly altered by changes in the adduction moment but a larger adduction rotation hugely increased this ratio from 8.8 to a 90 while in contrast a smaller adduction rotation yielded a more uniform distribution. If the aim in an intervention is to diminish the medial contact force and medial/lateral load ratio, a drop of 1.5° in adduction angle is much more effective (causing respectively 12% and 80% decreases) than a reduction of 50% in the adduction moment (causing respectively 4% and 13% decreases). Substantial role of changes in adduction angle is due to the associated alterations in joint nonlinear passive resistance. These findings explain the poor correlation between knee adduction moment and tibiofemoral compartment loading during gait suggesting that the internal load partitioning is dictated by the joint adduction angle.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adduction angle and moment; Finite element method; Gait; Knee joint; Medial contact force

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24636718     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.02.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  12 in total

Review 1.  Osteoarthritis year in review 2015: mechanics.

Authors:  N H Varady; A J Grodzinsky
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Comparison of different material models of articular cartilage in 3D computational modeling of the knee: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI).

Authors:  Olesya Klets; Mika E Mononen; Petri Tanska; Miika T Nieminen; Rami K Korhonen; Simo Saarakkala
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Gait mechanics in those with/without medial compartment knee osteoarthritis 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Ashutosh Khandha; Kurt Manal; Elizabeth Wellsandt; Jacob Capin; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Thomas S Buchanan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Topographical Variation of Human Femoral Articular Cartilage Thickness, T1rho and T2 Relaxation Times Is Related to Local Loading during Walking.

Authors:  Sam Van Rossom; Mariska Wesseling; Dieter Van Assche; Ilse Jonkers
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  The effect of articular geometry features identified using statistical shape modelling on knee biomechanics.

Authors:  Allison L Clouthier; Colin R Smith; Michael F Vignos; Darryl G Thelen; Kevin J Deluzio; Michael J Rainbow
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 6.  Recent Advances in the Neural Control of Movements: Lessons for Functional Recovery.

Authors:  Mark L Latash; Momoko Yamagata
Journal:  Phys Ther Res       Date:  2021-09-29

7.  A statistically-augmented computational platform for evaluating meniscal function.

Authors:  Hongqiang Guo; Thomas J Santner; Tony Chen; Hongsheng Wang; Caroline Brial; Susannah L Gilbert; Matthew F Koff; Amy L Lerner; Suzanne A Maher
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 8.  Material models and properties in the finite element analysis of knee ligaments: a literature review.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Maren Freutel; Lutz Dürselen; Marta D'Aiuto; Davide Croce; Tomaso Villa; Valerio Sansone; Bernardo Innocenti
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2014-11-17

9.  Comparison between kinetic and kinetic-kinematic driven knee joint finite element models.

Authors:  Paul O Bolcos; Mika E Mononen; Ali Mohammadi; Mohammadhossein Ebrahimi; Matthew S Tanaka; Michael A Samaan; Richard B Souza; Xiaojuan Li; Juha-Sampo Suomalainen; Jukka S Jurvelin; Juha Töyräs; Rami K Korhonen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Knee loading in OA subjects is correlated to flexion and adduction moments and to contact point locations.

Authors:  Ali Zeighami; Raphael Dumas; Rachid Aissaoui
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.