Literature DB >> 27082166

Gait mechanics in those with/without medial compartment knee osteoarthritis 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Ashutosh Khandha1, Kurt Manal2, Elizabeth Wellsandt3, Jacob Capin3, Lynn Snyder-Mackler3, Thomas S Buchanan1,2.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate differences in gait mechanics 5 years after unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery, for non-osteoarthritic (n = 24) versus osteoarthritic (n = 9) subjects. For the involved knee, the osteoarthritic group demonstrated significantly lower peak knee flexion angles (non-osteoarthritic = 24.3 ± 4.6°, osteoarthritic = 19.1 ± 2.9°, p = 0.01) and peak knee flexion moments (non-osteoarthritic = 5.3 ± 1.2% Body Weight × Height, osteoarthritic = 4.4 ± 1.2% Body Weight × Height, p = 0.05). Differences in peak knee adduction moment approached significance, with a higher magnitude for the osteoarthritic group (non-osteoarthritic = 2.4 ± 0.8% Body Weight × Height, osteoarthritic = 2.9 ± 0.5% Body Weight × Height, p = 0.09). Peak medial compartment joint load was evaluated using electromyography-informed neuromusculoskeletal modeling. Peak medial compartment joint load in the involved knee for the two groups was not different (non-osteoarthritic = 2.4 ± 0.4 Body Weight, osteoarthritic = 2.3 ± 0.6 Body Weight). The results suggest that subjects with dissimilar peak knee moments can have similar peak medial compartment joint load magnitudes. There was no evidence of inter-limb asymmetry for either group. Given the presence of inter-group differences (non-osteoarthritic vs. osteoarthritic) for the involved knee, but an absence of inter-limb asymmetry in either group, it may be necessary to evaluate how symmetry is achieved, over time, and to differentiate between good versus bad inter-limb symmetry, when evaluating knee gait parameters.
© 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:625-633, 2017. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL; ACLR; knee; musculoskeletal modeling; osteoarthritis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27082166      PMCID: PMC5065735          DOI: 10.1002/jor.23261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  45 in total

1.  Tibiofemoral contact points relative to flexion angle measured with MRI.

Authors:  Per Wretenberg; Dan K Ramsey; Gunnar Németh
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis.

Authors:  J H KELLGREN; J S LAWRENCE
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Dynamic versus radiographic alignment in relation to medial knee loading in symptomatic osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Joaquin A Barrios; Todd D Royer; Irene S Davis
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.833

4.  Predictors of radiographic knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Ryan T Li; Stephan Lorenz; Yan Xu; Christopher D Harner; Freddie H Fu; James J Irrgang
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Gait patterns after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are related to graft type.

Authors:  Kate E Webster; Joanne E Wittwer; Jason O'Brien; Julian A Feller
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  In vivo tibiofemoral contact analysis using 3D MRI-based knee models.

Authors:  Louis E DeFrate; Hao Sun; Thomas J Gill; Harry E Rubash; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  A 10-year prospective trial of a patient management algorithm and screening examination for highly active individuals with anterior cruciate ligament injury: Part 1, outcomes.

Authors:  Wendy J Hurd; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Gait patterns differ between ACL-reconstructed athletes who pass return-to-sport criteria and those who fail.

Authors:  Stephanie L Di Stasi; David Logerstedt; Emily S Gardinier; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 9.  A systems view of risk factors for knee osteoarthritis reveals insights into the pathogenesis of the disease.

Authors:  Thomas P Andriacchi; Julien Favre; J C Erhart-Hledik; Constance R Chu
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 10.  The Relationship between Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Osteoarthritis of the Knee.

Authors:  David Simon; Randy Mascarenhas; Bryan M Saltzman; Meaghan Rollins; Bernard R Bach; Peter MacDonald
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2015-04-19
View more
  19 in total

1.  Hamstrings Neuromuscular Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  David A Sherman; Neal R Glaviano; Grant E Norte
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Gait mechanics and tibiofemoral loading in men of the ACL-SPORTS randomized control trial.

Authors:  Jacob J Capin; Ashutosh Khandha; Ryan Zarzycki; Amelia J H Arundale; Melissa L Ziegler; Kurt Manal; Thomas S Buchanan; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Gait Mechanics in Women of the ACL-SPORTS Randomized Control Trial: Interlimb Symmetry Improves Over Time Regardless of Treatment Group.

Authors:  Jacob J Capin; Ryan Zarzycki; Naoaki Ito; Ashutosh Khandha; Celeste Dix; Kurt Manal; Thomas S Buchanan; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport Is Associated With Knee Kinematic Asymmetry During Gait Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ryan Zarzycki; Mathew Failla; Jacob J Capin; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 4.751

5.  Report of the Primary Outcomes for Gait Mechanics in Men of the ACL-SPORTS Trial: Secondary Prevention With and Without Perturbation Training Does Not Restore Gait Symmetry in Men 1 or 2 Years After ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jacob John Capin; Ryan Zarzycki; Amelia Arundale; Kathleen Cummer; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Cyclops lesions are associated with altered gait patterns and medial knee joint cartilage degeneration at 1 year after ACL-reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael A Samaan; Luca Facchetti; Valentina Pedoia; Matthew S Tanaka; Thomas M Link; Richard B Souza; C Benjamin Ma; Xiaojuan Li
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Operative and nonoperative management of anterior cruciate ligament injury: Differences in gait biomechanics at 5 years.

Authors:  Elizabeth Wellsandt; Ashutosh Khandha; Jacob Capin; Thomas S Buchanan; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Partial medial meniscectomy leads to altered walking mechanics two years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Meniscal repair does not.

Authors:  Jacob J Capin; Ashutosh Khandha; Thomas S Buchanan; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 2.840

9.  Slower Walking Speed Is Related to Early Femoral Trochlear Cartilage Degradation After ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jacob J Capin; Jack R Williams; Kelsey Neal; Ashutosh Khandha; Laura Durkee; Naoaki Ito; Joshua J Stefanik; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Thomas S Buchanan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Knee cartilage T2 relaxation times 3 months after ACL reconstruction are associated with knee gait variables linked to knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Jack R Williams; Kelsey Neal; Abdulmajeed Alfayyadh; Kendra Lennon; Jacob J Capin; Ashutosh Khandha; Kurt Manal; Hollis G Potter; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Thomas S Buchanan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.