Literature DB >> 24636223

Is midsole thickness a key parameter for the running pattern?

Nicolas Chambon1, Nicolas Delattre2, Nils Guéguen2, Eric Berton3, Guillaume Rao3.   

Abstract

Many studies have highlighted differences in foot strike pattern comparing habitually shod runners who ran barefoot and with running shoes. Barefoot running results in a flatter foot landing and in a decreased vertical ground reaction force compared to shod running. The aim of this study was to investigate one possible parameter influencing running pattern: the midsole thickness. Fifteen participants ran overground at 3.3 ms(-1) barefoot and with five shoes of different midsole thickness (0 mm, 2 mm, 4 mm, 8 mm, 16 mm) with no difference of height between rearfoot and forefoot. Impact magnitude was evaluated using transient peak of vertical ground reaction force, loading rate, tibial acceleration peak and rate. Hip, knee and ankle flexion angles were computed at touch-down and during stance phase (range of motion and maximum values). External net joint moments and stiffness for hip, knee and ankle joints were also observed as well as global leg stiffness. No significant effect of midsole thickness was observed on ground reaction force and tibial acceleration. However, the contact time increased with midsole thickness. Barefoot running compared to shod running induced ankle in plantar flexion at touch-down, higher ankle dorsiflexion and lower knee flexion during stance phase. These adjustments are suspected to explain the absence of difference on ground reaction force and tibial acceleration. This study showed that the presence of very thin footwear upper and sole was sufficient to significantly influence the running pattern.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barefoot; Foot-strike; Minimalist shoe; Running

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24636223     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  11 in total

1.  Shoe drop has opposite influence on running pattern when running overground or on a treadmill.

Authors:  Nicolas Chambon; Nicolas Delattre; Nils Guéguen; Eric Berton; Guillaume Rao
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Systematic Review of the Role of Footwear Constructions in Running Biomechanics: Implications for Running-Related Injury and Performance.

Authors:  Xiaole Sun; Wing-Kai Lam; Xini Zhang; Junqing Wang; Weijie Fu
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Altered Vertical Ground Reaction Forces in Participants With Chronic Ankle Instability While Running.

Authors:  John Bigouette; Janet Simon; Kathy Liu; Carrie L Docherty
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 4.  The Use of Wearable Sensors for Preventing, Assessing, and Informing Recovery from Sport-Related Musculoskeletal Injuries: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ezio Preatoni; Elena Bergamini; Silvia Fantozzi; Lucie I Giraud; Amaranta S Orejel Bustos; Giuseppe Vannozzi; Valentina Camomilla
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 5.  Stiffness as a Risk Factor for Achilles Tendon Injury in Running Athletes.

Authors:  Anna V Lorimer; Patria A Hume
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Increased vertical impact forces and altered running mechanics with softer midsole shoes.

Authors:  Jennifer Baltich; Christian Maurer; Benno M Nigg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Influence of custom-made and prefabricated insoles before and after an intense run.

Authors:  Angel Gabriel Lucas-Cuevas; Andrés Camacho-García; Raúl Llinares; Jose Ignacio Priego Quesada; Salvador Llana-Belloch; Pedro Pérez-Soriano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Differences and mechanisms underpinning a change in the knee flexion moment while running in stability and neutral footwear among young females.

Authors:  Timothy A Sayer; Rana S Hinman; Kade L Paterson; Kim L Bennell; Karine Fortin; J Kasza; Adam L Bryant
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  A consensus definition and rating scale for minimalist shoes.

Authors:  Jean-Francois Esculier; Blaise Dubois; Clermont E Dionne; Jean Leblond; Jean-Sébastien Roy
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 10.  Is There an Economical Running Technique? A Review of Modifiable Biomechanical Factors Affecting Running Economy.

Authors:  Isabel S Moore
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.