OBJECTIVES: Slower rates of aging distinguish humans from our nearest living cousins. Chimpanzees rarely survive their forties while large fractions of women are postmenopausal even in high-mortality hunter-gatherer populations. Cellular and molecular mechanisms for these somatic aging differences remain to be identified, though telomeres might play a role. To find out, we compared telomere lengths across age-matched samples of female chimpanzees and women. METHODS: We used a monochrome multiplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction to assay canonical telomere repeats in blood cells from captive female chimpanzees (65 individuals; age: 6.2-56.7 years) and compared them to the same measure in human females (43 individuals; age: 7.4-57.3 years). RESULTS: Our samples showed little difference in attrition rates between the species (~0.022 T/S per year for chimpanzees and ~0.012 T/S per year for humans with overlapping 95% confidence intervals), but telomeres were twice as long in chimpanzees as in humans (T/S ratios = 2.70 and 1.26, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the longevity differences, we initially hypothesized that telomere shortening rates would be faster in chimpanzees than in humans. Instead, it is shorter telomere length that appears to be the derived state in humans. This comparison indicates that better characterization of physiological aging in our closest living relatives will be indispensable for understanding the evolution of distinctive human longevity.
OBJECTIVES: Slower rates of aging distinguish humans from our nearest living cousins. Chimpanzees rarely survive their forties while large fractions of women are postmenopausal even in high-mortality hunter-gatherer populations. Cellular and molecular mechanisms for these somatic aging differences remain to be identified, though telomeres might play a role. To find out, we compared telomere lengths across age-matched samples of female chimpanzees and women. METHODS: We used a monochrome multiplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction to assay canonical telomere repeats in blood cells from captive female chimpanzees (65 individuals; age: 6.2-56.7 years) and compared them to the same measure in human females (43 individuals; age: 7.4-57.3 years). RESULTS: Our samples showed little difference in attrition rates between the species (~0.022 T/S per year for chimpanzees and ~0.012 T/S per year for humans with overlapping 95% confidence intervals), but telomeres were twice as long in chimpanzees as in humans (T/S ratios = 2.70 and 1.26, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the longevity differences, we initially hypothesized that telomere shortening rates would be faster in chimpanzees than in humans. Instead, it is shorter telomere length that appears to be the derived state in humans. This comparison indicates that better characterization of physiological aging in our closest living relatives will be indispensable for understanding the evolution of distinctive human longevity.
Authors: Nuno M V Gomes; Oliver A Ryder; Marlys L Houck; Suellen J Charter; William Walker; Nicholas R Forsyth; Steven N Austad; Chris Venditti; Mark Pagel; Jerry W Shay; Woodring E Wright Journal: Aging Cell Date: 2011-06-01 Impact factor: 9.304
Authors: Dan T A Eisenberg; Justin Tackney; Richard M Cawthon; Christina Theresa Cloutier; Kristen Hawkes Journal: Am J Phys Anthropol Date: 2016-10-12 Impact factor: 2.868
Authors: Peter H Rej; Madison H Bondy; Jue Lin; Aric A Prather; Brandon A Kohrt; Carol M Worthman; Dan T A Eisenberg Journal: Am J Hum Biol Date: 2020-03-18 Impact factor: 1.937
Authors: Luise A Seeker; Rebecca Holland; Sarah Underwood; Jennifer Fairlie; Androniki Psifidi; Joanna J Ilska; Ainsley Bagnall; Bruce Whitelaw; Mike Coffey; Georgios Banos; Daniel H Nussey Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-10-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kurt Whittemore; Elsa Vera; Eva Martínez-Nevado; Carola Sanpera; Maria A Blasco Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-07-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Steven C Hunt; Matthew E B Hansen; Simon Verhulst; Michael A McQuillan; William Beggs; Tsung-Po Lai; Gaonyadiwe G Mokone; Sununguko Wata Mpoloka; Dawit Wolde Meskel; Gurja Belay; Thomas B Nyambo; Christian C Abnet; Meredith Yeager; Stephen J Chanock; Michael A Province; Scott M Williams; Abraham Aviv; Sarah A Tishkoff Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Johanna Pölönen; Pekka Pinola; Justiina Ronkainen; Alex I Blakemore; Jessica L Buxton; Juha S Tapanainen; Stephen Franks; Terhi T Piltonen; Sylvain Sebert; Laure Morin-Papunen Journal: Eur J Endocrinol Date: 2022-09-29 Impact factor: 6.558