Literature DB >> 19409719

Did natural selection for increased cognitive ability in humans lead to an elevated risk of cancer?

Gaurav Arora1, Nalini Polavarapu, John F McDonald.   

Abstract

Despite the overall genetic similarity that exists between humans and chimpanzees, the species are phenotypically distinct. Among the most notable distinctions are differences in brain size and cognitive abilities. Previous studies have shown that significant differences in gene expression exist between the human and chimpanzee brain. Integration of currently available gene expression data with known metabolic and signaling pathways indicates that the expression of genes involved in the programmed cell death of brain neurons is significantly different between humans and chimpanzees and predictive of a reduced level of neuron apoptosis in the human brain. This pattern of expression is generally maintained in other human organs suggesting that apoptosis is reduced in humans relative to chimpanzees. We propose that a decreased rate of programmed neuron death may have been a consequence of selection for increased cognitive ability in humans. Since reduced apoptotic function is associated with an increased risk of cancer and related diseases, we hypothesize that selection for increased cognitive ability in humans coincidently resulted in an increased risk of cancer and other diseases associated with reduced apoptotic function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19409719     DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2009.03.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Hypotheses        ISSN: 0306-9877            Impact factor:   1.538


  8 in total

1.  Blood cell telomere lengths and shortening rates of chimpanzee and human females.

Authors:  Justin Tackney; Richard M Cawthon; James E Coxworth; Kristen Hawkes
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 1.937

Review 2.  On the apparent rarity of epithelial cancers in captive chimpanzees.

Authors:  Nissi M Varki; Ajit Varki
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The grandmother effect and the uniqueness of the human aging phenotype.

Authors:  James G Herndon; Lary C Walker
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 5.140

4.  Peto's paradox and the promise of comparative oncology.

Authors:  Leonard Nunney; Carlo C Maley; Matthew Breen; Michael E Hochberg; Joshua D Schiffman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Human cells display reduced apoptotic function relative to chimpanzee cells.

Authors:  Gaurav Arora; Roman Mezencev; John F McDonald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Is my network module preserved and reproducible?

Authors:  Peter Langfelder; Rui Luo; Michael C Oldham; Steve Horvath
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Characterization and potential functional significance of human-chimpanzee large INDEL variation.

Authors:  Nalini Polavarapu; Gaurav Arora; Vinay K Mittal; John F McDonald
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2011-10-25

Review 8.  The influence of evolutionary history on human health and disease.

Authors:  Mary Lauren Benton; Abin Abraham; Abigail L LaBella; Patrick Abbot; Antonis Rokas; John A Capra
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 53.242

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.