Literature DB >> 24633873

The precarious prokaryotic chromosome.

Andrei Kuzminov1.   

Abstract

Evolutionary selection for optimal genome preservation, replication, and expression should yield similar chromosome organizations in any type of cells. And yet, the chromosome organization is surprisingly different between eukaryotes and prokaryotes. The nuclear versus cytoplasmic accommodation of genetic material accounts for the distinct eukaryotic and prokaryotic modes of genome evolution, but it falls short of explaining the differences in the chromosome organization. I propose that the two distinct ways to organize chromosomes are driven by the differences between the global-consecutive chromosome cycle of eukaryotes and the local-concurrent chromosome cycle of prokaryotes. Specifically, progressive chromosome segregation in prokaryotes demands a single duplicon per chromosome, while other "precarious" features of the prokaryotic chromosomes can be viewed as compensations for this severe restriction.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24633873      PMCID: PMC4011006          DOI: 10.1128/JB.00022-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  168 in total

Review 1.  The biology of eukaryotic promoter prediction--a review.

Authors:  A G Pedersen; P Baldi; Y Chauvin; S Brunak
Journal:  Comput Chem       Date:  1999-06-15

Review 2.  Fundamentally different logic of gene regulation in eukaryotes and prokaryotes.

Authors:  K Struhl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1999-07-09       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Splitting the chromosome: cutting the ties that bind sister chromatids.

Authors:  K Nasmyth; J M Peters; F Uhlmann
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Human gene organization driven by the coordination of replication and transcription.

Authors:  Maxime Huvet; Samuel Nicolay; Marie Touchon; Benjamin Audit; Yves d'Aubenton-Carafa; Alain Arneodo; Claude Thermes
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 5.  Organization of the genome and gene expression in a nuclear environment lacking histones and nucleosomes: the amazing dinoflagellates.

Authors:  Susana Moreno Díaz de la Espina; Elsa Alverca; Angeles Cuadrado; Susana Franca
Journal:  Eur J Cell Biol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Operon formation is driven by co-regulation and not by horizontal gene transfer.

Authors:  Morgan N Price; Katherine H Huang; Adam P Arkin; Eric J Alm
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 7.  The major architects of chromatin: architectural proteins in bacteria, archaea and eukaryotes.

Authors:  Martijn S Luijsterburg; Malcolm F White; Roel van Driel; Remus Th Dame
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.250

Review 8.  Identification of replication origins in prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Natalia V Sernova; Mikhail S Gelfand
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 11.622

9.  Conservation of gene order: a fingerprint of proteins that physically interact.

Authors:  T Dandekar; B Snel; M Huynen; P Bork
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 13.807

10.  Origin and sequence of chromosome replication in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  R E Bird; J Louarn; J Martuscelli; L Caro
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1972-10-14       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  When DNA Topology Turns Deadly - RNA Polymerases Dig in Their R-Loops to Stand Their Ground: New Positive and Negative (Super)Twists in the Replication-Transcription Conflict.

Authors:  Andrei Kuzminov
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 2.  Fifty years after the replicon hypothesis: cell-specific master regulators as new players in chromosome replication control.

Authors:  Marcin Wolański; Dagmara Jakimowicz; Jolanta Zakrzewska-Czerwińska
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  RNase HII Saves rnhA Mutant Escherichia coli from R-Loop-Associated Chromosomal Fragmentation.

Authors:  Elena A Kouzminova; Farid F Kadyrov; Andrei Kuzminov
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Improved sgRNA design in bacteria via genome-wide activity profiling.

Authors:  Jiahui Guo; Tianmin Wang; Changge Guan; Bing Liu; Cheng Luo; Zhen Xie; Chong Zhang; Xin-Hui Xing
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Near-continuously synthesized leading strands in Escherichia coli are broken by ribonucleotide excision.

Authors:  Glen E Cronan; Elena A Kouzminova; Andrei Kuzminov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Replication fork inhibition in seqA mutants of Escherichia coli triggers replication fork breakage.

Authors:  Ella Rotman; Sharik R Khan; Elena Kouzminova; Andrei Kuzminov
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 3.501

7.  Static and Dynamic Factors Limit Chromosomal Replication Complexity in Escherichia coli, Avoiding Dangers of Runaway Overreplication.

Authors:  Sharik R Khan; Tulip Mahaseth; Elena A Kouzminova; Glen E Cronan; Andrei Kuzminov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The ParB-parS Chromosome Segregation System Modulates Competence Development in Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  Laetitia Attaiech; Anita Minnen; Morten Kjos; Stephan Gruber; Jan-Willem Veening
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 7.867

9.  Optimization and Characterization of the Synthetic Secondary Chromosome synVicII in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Sonja J Messerschmidt; Daniel Schindler; Celine M Zumkeller; Franziska S Kemter; Nadine Schallopp; Torsten Waldminghaus
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2016-12-23

10.  Targeted activation of diverse CRISPR-Cas systems for mammalian genome editing via proximal CRISPR targeting.

Authors:  Fuqiang Chen; Xiao Ding; Yongmei Feng; Timothy Seebeck; Yanfang Jiang; Gregory D Davis
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.