Literature DB >> 15819396

Organization of the genome and gene expression in a nuclear environment lacking histones and nucleosomes: the amazing dinoflagellates.

Susana Moreno Díaz de la Espina1, Elsa Alverca, Angeles Cuadrado, Susana Franca.   

Abstract

Dinoflagellates are fascinating protists that have attracted researchers from different fields. The free-living species are major primary producers and the cause of harmful algal blooms sometimes associated with red tides. Dinoflagellates lack histones and nucleosomes and present a unique genome and chromosome organization, being considered the only living knockouts of histones. Their plastids contain genes organized in unigenic minicircles. Basic cell structure, biochemistry and molecular phylogeny place the dinoflagellates firmly among the eukaryotes. They have G1-S-G2-M cell cycles, repetitive sequences, ribosomal genes in tandem, nuclear matrix, snRNAs, and eukaryotic cytoplasm, whereas their nuclear DNA is different, from base composition to chromosome organization. They have a high G + C content, highly methylated and rare bases such as 5-hydroxymethyluracil (HOMeU), no TATA boxes, and form distinct interphasic dinochromosomes with a liquid crystalline organization of DNA, stabilized by metal cations and structural RNA. Without histones and with a protein:DNA mass ratio (1:10) lower than prokaryotes, they need a different way of packing their huge amounts of DNA into a functional chromatin. In spite of the high interest in the dinoflagellate system in genetics, molecular and cellular biology, their analysis until now has been very restricted. We review here the main achievements in the characterization of the genome, nucleus and chromosomes in this diversified phylum. The recent discovery of a eukaryotic structural and functional differentiation in the dinochromosomes and of the organization of gene expression in them, demonstrate that in spite of the secondary loss of histones, that produce a lack of nucleosomal and supranucleosomal chromatin organization, they keep a functional nuclear organization closer to eukaryotes than to prokaryotes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15819396     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2005.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0171-9335            Impact factor:   4.492


  22 in total

Review 1.  The biosynthesis of polyketide metabolites by dinoflagellates.

Authors:  Kathleen S Rein; Richard V Snyder
Journal:  Adv Appl Microbiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.086

2.  Mechanisms of Evolutionary Innovation Point to Genetic Control Logic as the Key Difference Between Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes.

Authors:  William Bains; Dirk Schulze-Makuch
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 3.  The precarious prokaryotic chromosome.

Authors:  Andrei Kuzminov
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Comparative gene expression in toxic versus non-toxic strains of the marine dinoflagellate Alexandrium minutum.

Authors:  Ines Yang; Uwe John; Sára Beszteri; Gernot Glöckner; Bernd Krock; Alexander Goesmann; Allan D Cembella
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  A full suite of histone and histone modifying genes are transcribed in the dinoflagellate Lingulodinium.

Authors:  Sougata Roy; David Morse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evolution of light-harvesting complex proteins from Chl c-containing algae.

Authors:  Gabriel E Hoffman; M Virginia Sanchez Puerta; Charles F Delwiche
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  The evolutionary history of histone H3 suggests a deep eukaryotic root of chromatin modifying mechanisms.

Authors:  Jan Postberg; Sakeh Forcob; Wei-Jen Chang; Hans J Lipps
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Comparative genomic and transcriptomic characterization of the toxigenic marine dinoflagellate Alexandrium ostenfeldii.

Authors:  Nina Jaeckisch; Ines Yang; Sylke Wohlrab; Gernot Glöckner; Juergen Kroymann; Heiko Vogel; Allan Cembella; Uwe John
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Diversity of Eukaryotic Translational Initiation Factor eIF4E in Protists.

Authors:  Rosemary Jagus; Tsvetan R Bachvaroff; Bhavesh Joshi; Allen R Place
Journal:  Comp Funct Genomics       Date:  2012-06-20

10.  Transcriptomic characterisation and genomic glimps into the toxigenic dinoflagellate Azadinium spinosum, with emphasis on polykeitde synthase genes.

Authors:  Jan M Meyer; Christian Rödelsperger; Karsten Eichholz; Urban Tillmann; Allan Cembella; Angela McGaughran; Uwe John
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.