Literature DB >> 2463368

Generation of different nucleosome spacing periodicities in vitro. Possible origin of cell type specificity.

A Stein1, M Mitchell.   

Abstract

We have been able to generate ordered nucleosome arrays that span the physiological range of spacing periodicities, using an in vitro system. Our system (a refinement of the procedure previously developed) uses the synthetic polynucleotide poly[d(A-T)], poly[d(A-T)], core histones, purified H1, and polyglutamic acid, a factor that increases nucleohistone solubility and greatly promotes the formation of ordered nucleosome arrays. This system has three useful features, not found in other chromatin assembly systems. First, it allowed us to examine histones from three different cell types/species (sea urchin sperm, chicken erythrocyte, and HeLa) as homologous or heterologous combinations of core and H1 histones. Second, it allowed us to control the average packing density (core histone to polynucleotide weight ratio) of nucleosomes on the polynucleotide; histone H1 is added in a second distinct step in the procedure to induce nucleosome alignment. Third, it permitted us to study nucleosome array formation in the absence of DNA base sequence effects. We show that the value of the spacing periodicity is controlled by the value of the initial average nucleosome packing density. The full range of physiological periodicities appears to be accessible to arrays generated using chicken erythrocyte (or HeLa) core histones in combination with chicken H5. However, chromatin-like structures cannot be assembled for some nucleosome packing densities in reactions involving some histone types, thus limiting the range of periodicities that can be achieved. For example, H1 histone types differ significantly in their ability to recruit disordered nucleosomes into ordered arrays at low packing densities. Sea urchin sperm H1 is more efficient than chicken H5, which is more efficient than H1 from HeLa or chicken erythrocyte. Sea urchin sperm core histones are more efficient in this respect than the other core histone types used. These findings suggest how different repeat lengths arise in different cell types and species, and provide new insights into the problems of nucleosome linker heterogeneity and how different types of chromatin structures could be generated in the same cell.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2463368     DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90127-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  21 in total

1.  Histone H4 lysine 91 acetylation a core domain modification associated with chromatin assembly.

Authors:  Jianxin Ye; Xi Ai; Ericka E Eugeni; Liwen Zhang; Laura Rocco Carpenter; Mary A Jelinek; Michael A Freitas; Mark R Parthun
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Chaperone-mediated assembly of centromeric chromatin in vitro.

Authors:  Takehito Furuyama; Yamini Dalal; Steven Henikoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  ATP dependent histone phosphorylation and nucleosome assembly in a human cell free extract.

Authors:  S Banerjee; G R Bennion; M W Goldberg; T D Allen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Histone H1 represses transcription from minichromosomes assembled in vitro.

Authors:  A Shimamura; M Sapp; A Rodriguez-Campos; A Worcel
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Signals in chicken beta-globin DNA influence chromatin assembly in vitro.

Authors:  K Liu; J D Lauderdale; A Stein
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Differential binding of c-Myc and Max to nucleosomal DNA.

Authors:  D S Wechsler; O Papoulas; C V Dang; R E Kingston
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Linker histones H1 and H5 prevent the mobility of positioned nucleosomes.

Authors:  S Pennings; G Meersseman; E M Bradbury
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-10-25       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  BRD4 assists elongation of both coding and enhancer RNAs by interacting with acetylated histones.

Authors:  Tomohiko Kanno; Yuka Kanno; Gary LeRoy; Eric Campos; Hong-Wei Sun; Stephen R Brooks; Golnaz Vahedi; Tom D Heightman; Benjamin A Garcia; Danny Reinberg; Ulrich Siebenlist; John J O'Shea; Keiko Ozato
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 15.369

9.  The peculiar binding properties of 4'-deoxy,4'-iododoxorubicin to isolated DNA and 175 bp nucleosomes.

Authors:  C Cera; M Palumbo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-10-25       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  A native chromatin purification system for epigenomic profiling in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Siew Loon Ooi; Jorja G Henikoff; Steven Henikoff
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.