Literature DB >> 8196648

Differential binding of c-Myc and Max to nucleosomal DNA.

D S Wechsler1, O Papoulas, C V Dang, R E Kingston.   

Abstract

The ability of a transcription factor to function in vivo must be determined in part by its ability to bind to its recognition site in chromatin. We have used Max and derivatives of c-Myc to characterize the effect of changes of dimerization partner on binding to nucleosomal DNA templates. We find that homo- and heterodimeric complexes of these proteins bind to the CACGTG sequence in free DNA with similar affinities. Although Max homodimers bind to nucleosomes, truncated c-Myc homodimers do not. Surprisingly, modifying the c-Myc dimerization interface or changing its dimerization partner to Max enables nucleosomal DNA binding. Thus, changes in dimer structure or dimerization efficiency can have significant effects on nucleosome binding that are not predicted from their affinity for free DNA. We conclude that domains other than the basic region per se influence the ability of a transcription factor to bind to nucleosomal DNA and that changes of dimerization partner can directly affect the ability of a factor to occupy nucleosomal binding sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8196648      PMCID: PMC358775          DOI: 10.1128/mcb.14.6.4097-4107.1994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  56 in total

Review 1.  The interaction of transcription factors with nucleosomal DNA.

Authors:  J J Hayes; A P Wolffe
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  Myc/Max and other helix-loop-helix/leucine zipper proteins bend DNA toward the minor groove.

Authors:  D E Fisher; L A Parent; P A Sharp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Nucleosome core displacement in vitro via a metastable transcription factor-nucleosome complex.

Authors:  J L Workman; R E Kingston
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Chromatin as an essential part of the transcriptional mechanism.

Authors:  G Felsenfeld
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-01-16       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Recognition by Max of its cognate DNA through a dimeric b/HLH/Z domain.

Authors:  A R Ferré-D'Amaré; G C Prendergast; E B Ziff; S K Burley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-05-06       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Transcription. The omnipotent nucleosome.

Authors:  K van Holde
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-03-11       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Both the helix-loop-helix and the leucine zipper motifs of c-Myc contribute to its dimerization specificity with Max.

Authors:  L J Davis; T D Halazonetis
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 8.  Nucleosome displacement in transcription.

Authors:  C C Adams; J L Workman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-02-12       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Quantitative model for gene regulation by lambda phage repressor.

Authors:  G K Ackers; A D Johnson; M A Shea
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Interactions between DNA-bound repressors govern regulation by the lambda phage repressor.

Authors:  A D Johnson; B J Meyer; M Ptashne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  25 in total

1.  Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1 binds and destabilizes nucleosomes at the viral origin of latent DNA replication.

Authors:  T M Avolio-Hunter; P N Lewis; L Frappier
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Mi2beta shows chromatin enzyme specificity by erasing a DNase I-hypersensitive site established by ACF.

Authors:  Haruhiko Ishii; Hansen Du; Zhaoqing Zhang; Angus Henderson; Ranjan Sen; Michael J Pazin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Genomic and proteomic analysis reveals a threshold level of MYC required for tumor maintenance.

Authors:  Catherine M Shachaf; Andrew J Gentles; Sailaja Elchuri; Debashis Sahoo; Yoav Soen; Orr Sharpe; Omar D Perez; Maria Chang; Dennis Mitchel; William H Robinson; David Dill; Garry P Nolan; Sylvia K Plevritis; Dean W Felsher
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  p53 binding to nucleosomal DNA depends on the rotational positioning of DNA response element.

Authors:  Geetaram Sahu; Difei Wang; Claudia B Chen; Victor B Zhurkin; Rodney E Harrington; Ettore Appella; Gordon L Hager; Akhilesh K Nagaich
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Binding of the wheat basic leucine zipper protein EmBP-1 to nucleosomal binding sites is modulated by nucleosome positioning.

Authors:  X Niu; C C Adams; J L Workman; M J Guiltinan
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  Activation domain-mediated enhancement of activator binding to chromatin in mammalian cells.

Authors:  C A Bunker; R E Kingston
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Binding of the winged-helix transcription factor HNF3 to a linker histone site on the nucleosome.

Authors:  L A Cirillo; C E McPherson; P Bossard; K Stevens; S Cherian; E Y Shim; K L Clark; S K Burley; K S Zaret
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-01-02       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  The translational placement of nucleosome cores in vitro determines the access of the transacting factor suGF1 to DNA.

Authors:  H G Patterton; J Hapgood
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  High mobility group protein 1: A collaborator in nucleosome dynamics and estrogen-responsive gene expression.

Authors:  William M Scovell
Journal:  World J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-05-26

10.  Chromatin structure of the simian virus 40 late promoter: a deletional analysis.

Authors:  M Friez; R Hermansen; B Milavetz
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.