| Literature DB >> 24632827 |
Renata B Lacerda1, Natália M Sales2, Leandro L da Silva3, Roberta Tesch4, Ana Luisa P Miranda3, Eliezer J Barreiro5, Patricia D Fernandes2, Carlos A M Fraga5.
Abstract
In this work, we describe the design, synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of novelEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24632827 PMCID: PMC3954757 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091660
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Design of the novel imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-N-glycinyl-hydrazone derivatives 1a–k.
Figure 2Synthesis of imidazo[1,2-a]-pyridine-N-glycinyl-hydrazone derivatives 1a–k.
Yields and physical properties of imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-N-glycinyl-hydrazone derivatives 1a–k.
| Compound | MolecularFormula | MW | Yield (%) | m.p. (°C) |
|
| C30H36N6O3H2O | 545.68 | 30 | 135–137 |
|
| C32H32N6O3H2O | 566.65 | 85 | 105–108 |
|
| C28H30N6O3 | 498.58 | 60 | 169–171 |
|
| C22H19N5O2 | 385.42 | 90 | 273–275 |
|
| C22H18ClN5O | 403.86 | 55 | 120–122 |
|
| C22H19N5O | 369.42 | 70 | 138–141 |
|
| C20H23N5O | 349.43 | 60 | 230–232 |
|
| C26H34N6O3 | 478.59 | 40 | – |
|
| C20H22ClN5O | 383.87 | 68 | 232–234 |
|
| C20H22N5OH2O | 435.48 | 70 | >300 |
|
| C26H21N5O | 419.48 | 90 | 208–210 |
The analytical results for C, H and N were within 0.4% of the calculated values for all N-acylhydrazone derivatives 1a–k. The purity of N-acylhydrazone derivatives 1a–k was also determined by reversed-phase HPLC.
The yields refer to the condensation step of hydrazides 8a–b with the corresponding aromatic aldehydes (see Figure 2).
Obtained as a yellow oil (see Material and Methods).
Figure 3Probable conformational isomers of the NAH derivatives.
Tridimensional representation of antiperiplanar (magenta) and synperiplanar (blue) conformers of LASSBio-1626 (1 g) identified in the Monte Carlo conformational search.
Effects of imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-N-glycinyl-hydrazone derivatives 1a–k on TNF-α production and cell viability in murine peritoneal macrophages.
| Compound | TNF-α a | % of cell viability b | SelectivityIndex(SI) d |
| ||
| % inhibition at 10 µM | IC50(µM)c | at 10 µM | IC50 (µM)c(0.1–100) | |||
|
| 95.3 | 0.62 (0.03–10) | 20.1 | 6.9 | 11.1 | 4.2 |
|
| 77.3 | 0.34 (0.03–30) | 78.4 | 14.7 | 43.2 | 4.2 |
|
| 18.3 | – | 100 | – | – | 3.2 |
|
| 56.7 | 3.67 (0.1–30) | 100 | – | – | 3.3 |
|
| 53.8 | 3.05 (0.1–30) | 100 | – | – | 4.3 |
|
| 29.3 | – | 100 | – | – | 3.7 |
|
| 5.6 | – | 100 | – | – | 3.8 |
|
| 2.8 | – | 100 | – | – | 3.2 |
|
| 78.0 | 0.21 (0.03–30) | 73.3 | 21.7 | 103.3 | 4.3 |
|
| 90.8 | 0.31 (0.03–10) | 40.0 | 10.4 | 33.5 | 4.3 |
|
| 75.8 | 0.99 (0.03–30) | 83.2 | 23.5 | 23.7 | 4.7 |
|
| 90.0 | 0.22 (0.03–10) | 44.3 | 9.7 | 44.0 | – |
|
| 96.9 | 3.60 (0.1–30) | 61.5 | 10.3 | 2.8 | 6.0 |
The results are expressed as the apercent inhibition and bpercent cell viability compared to the vehicle (DMSO); n = 3 independent experiments performed in duplicate;
*p = 0.05 using student’s t test; cIC50 values were determined using at least five concentrations, the range concentration are showed in parentheses; d SI = cytotoxicity IC50/anti-TNF-α IC50; e values calculated using ACDLABS software.
Figure 4Effect of compound 1i on TNF-α production.
Twenty-four hours prior to carrageenan (1%) injection into the subcutaneous air pouch (SAP), animals were pretreated by oral administration with different doses of a solution of 1i. The results are presented as the mean ± S. D. (n = 6–10) of TNF-α (pg/mL). Statistical significance was calculated by ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test. * indicates p<0.005 for the comparison of 1i -treated mice with the vehicle-treated group; # indicates p<0.005 for the comparison of vehicle-treated mice with the PBS-treated group.
Figure 5Effect of compound 1i on IL-1β and IFN-γ production.
Twenty-four hours prior to carrageenan (1%) injection into the subcutaneous air pouch (SAP), animals were pretreated by oral administration with different doses of a solution of 1i. The results are presented as the mean ± S. D. (n = 6–10) of each cytokine (ng/mL). Statistical significance was calculated by ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test. * indicates p<0.005 for the comparison of 1i -treated mice with the vehicle-treated group; # indicates p<0.005 for the comparison of vehicle-treated mice with the PBS-treated group.