Literature DB >> 24631789

Functional and effective connectivity of stopping.

René J Huster1, Sergey M Plis2, Christina F Lavallee3, Vince D Calhoun4, Christoph S Herrmann5.   

Abstract

Behavioral inhibition often is studied by comparing the electroencephalographic responses to stop and to go signals. Most studies simply assess amplitude differences of the N200 and P300 event-related potentials, which seem to best correspond to increased activity in the theta and delta frequency bands, respectively. However, neither have reliable indicators for successful behavioral inhibition been identified nor have the causal dependencies of stop-related neurocognitive processes been addressed yet. By studying functional and effective connectivity underlying stopping behavior, this study opens new directions for the investigation of behavioral inhibition. Group independent component analysis was used to infer functionally coherent networks from electroencephalographic data, which were recorded from healthy human participants during processing of a stop signal task. Then, the temporal dynamics of causal dependencies between independent components were identified by means of Bayesian network estimations. The mean clustering coefficient and the characteristic path length measure indicated time windows between 130 and 180 ms and between 420 and 500 ms to express significantly different connectivity profiles between conditions. Three components showed significant correlations between 120 and 260 ms with stop signal reaction times and the number of failed stops. Two of these components acted as sources of causal flow, one capturing P300/delta characteristics while the other was characterized by alpha power depletion putatively representing the evaluation or processing of stimulus features. Although results suggest that the P300 and associated delta activity seem to be statistically dependent on earlier processes associated with behavioral inhibition, the time window critical for inhibition coincides with early changes in causal patterns and largely precedes peak amplitude differences between go and stop trials. Altogether, utilizing the analysis of stopping-related connectivity, previously undetected patterns emerged that warrant further investigation.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Connectivity; Delta; Inhibition; N200; P300; Stop signal task; Stopping; Theta

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24631789     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.02.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  11 in total

1.  Filling the void-enriching the feature space of successful stopping.

Authors:  René J Huster; Signe Schneider; Christina F Lavallee; Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The relationship between ERP components and EEG spatial complexity in a visual Go/Nogo task.

Authors:  Huibin Jia; Huayun Li; Dongchuan Yu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Data-driven analysis of simultaneous EEG/fMRI reveals neurophysiological phenotypes of impulse control.

Authors:  Lena Schmüser; Alexandra Sebastian; Arian Mobascher; Klaus Lieb; Bernd Feige; Oliver Tüscher
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Strategic down-regulation of attentional resources as a mechanism of proactive response inhibition.

Authors:  Zachary D Langford; Ruth M Krebs; Durk Talsma; Marty G Woldorff; C N Boehler
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  When the brain simulates stopping: Neural activity recorded during real and imagined stop-signal tasks.

Authors:  Alberto J González-Villar; F Mauricio Bonilla; María T Carrillo-de-la-Peña
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  How to stop or change a motor response: Laplacian and independent component analysis approach.

Authors:  Mauricio Rangel-Gomez; Robert T Knight; Ulrike M Krämer
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  When holding your horses meets the deer in the headlights: time-frequency characteristics of global and selective stopping under conditions of proactive and reactive control.

Authors:  Christina F Lavallee; Marie T Meemken; Christoph S Herrmann; Rene J Huster
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Motivational context for response inhibition influences proactive involvement of attention.

Authors:  Zachary D Langford; Hanne Schevernels; C Nico Boehler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Improving response inhibition systems in frontotemporal dementia with citalopram.

Authors:  Laura E Hughes; Timothy Rittman; Ralf Regenthal; Trevor W Robbins; James B Rowe
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Enhanced inhibitory control during re-engagement processing in badminton athletes: An event-related potential study.

Authors:  Jiacheng Chen; Yanan Li; Guanghui Zhang; Xinhong Jin; Yingzhi Lu; Chenglin Zhou
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 7.179

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.