Literature DB >> 27862666

Filling the void-enriching the feature space of successful stopping.

René J Huster1,2, Signe Schneider3, Christina F Lavallee4, Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert5, Christoph S Herrmann6,7.   

Abstract

The ability to inhibit behavior is crucial for adaptation in a fast changing environment and is commonly studied with the stop signal task. Current EEG research mainly focuses on the N200 and P300 ERPs and corresponding activity in the theta and delta frequency range, thereby leaving us with a limited understanding of the mechanisms of response inhibition. Here, 15 functional networks were estimated from time-frequency transformed EEG recorded during processing of a visual stop signal task. Cortical sources underlying these functional networks were reconstructed, and a total of 45 features, each representing spectrally and temporally coherent activity, were extracted to train a classifier to differentiate between go and stop trials. A classification accuracy of 85.55% for go and 83.85% for stop trials was achieved. Features capturing fronto-central delta- and theta activity, parieto-occipital alpha, fronto-central as well as right frontal beta activity were highly discriminating between trial-types. However, only a single network, comprising a feature defined by oscillatory activity below 12 Hz, was associated with a generator in the opercular region of the right inferior frontal cortex and showed the expected associations with behavioral inhibition performance. This study pioneers by providing a detailed ranking of neural features regarding their information content for stop and go differentiation at the single-trial level, and may further be the first to identify a scalp EEG marker of the inhibitory control network. This analysis allows for the characterization of the temporal dynamics of response inhibition by matching electrophysiological phenomena to cortical generators and behavioral inhibition performance. Hum Brain Mapp 38:1333-1346, 2017.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords:  N200; P300; classification; delta; inhibition; prediction; stop signal task; theta

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27862666      PMCID: PMC6867104          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  28 in total

1.  Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications.

Authors:  A Hyvärinen; E Oja
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2000 May-Jun

Review 2.  Left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the cognitive control of memory.

Authors:  David Badre; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Mechanisms and dynamics of cortical motor inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm: a TMS study.

Authors:  Wery P M van den Wildenberg; Borís Burle; Franck Vidal; Maurits W van der Molen; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Thierry Hasbroucq
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: functional networks and cognitive contributions.

Authors:  René J Huster; Stefanie Enriquez-Geppert; Christina F Lavallee; Michael Falkenstein; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Functional and effective connectivity of stopping.

Authors:  René J Huster; Sergey M Plis; Christina F Lavallee; Vince D Calhoun; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  It's not too late: the onset of the frontocentral P3 indexes successful response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Electrophysiological evidence for different inhibitory mechanisms when stopping or changing a planned response.

Authors:  Ulrike M Krämer; Robert T Knight; Thomas F Münte
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 8.  From reactive to proactive and selective control: developing a richer model for stopping inappropriate responses.

Authors:  Adam R Aron
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 9.  A Tutorial Review of Functional Connectivity Analysis Methods and Their Interpretational Pitfalls.

Authors:  André M Bastos; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-08

10.  Group-level component analyses of EEG: validation and evaluation.

Authors:  Rene J Huster; Sergey M Plis; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  3 in total

1.  Establishing a Right Frontal Beta Signature for Stopping Action in Scalp EEG: Implications for Testing Inhibitory Control in Other Task Contexts.

Authors:  Johanna Wagner; Jan R Wessel; Ayda Ghahremani; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Resting-state theta activity is linked to information content-specific coding levels during response inhibition.

Authors:  Charlotte Pscherer; Moritz Mückschel; Annet Bluschke; Christian Beste
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Effects of beta-band and gamma-band rhythmic stimulation on motor inhibition.

Authors:  Inge Leunissen; Manon Van Steenkiste; Kirstin-Friederike Heise; Thiago Santos Monteiro; Kyle Dunovan; Dante Mantini; James P Coxon; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-04-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.