Panayiotis Nikolaou1, Aaron M Coffey2, Laura L Walkup3, Brogan M Gust3, Nicholas Whiting4, Hayley Newton4, Iga Muradyan5, Mikayel Dabaghyan5, Kaili Ranta6, Gregory D Moroz7, Matthew S Rosen8, Samuel Patz5, Michael J Barlow4, Eduard Y Chekmenev9, Boyd M Goodson10. 1. Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS), Nashville, TN, 37232, United States; Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL. Electronic address: peter.nikolaou@vanderbilt.edu. 2. Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS), Nashville, TN, 37232, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, United States. 3. Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL. 4. Sir Peter Mansfield Magnetic Resonance Centre, University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, Nottingham, UK. 5. Department of Radiology, Brigham & Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 6. Department of Physics, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL. 7. Graduate School Central Research Shop, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL. 8. MGH/A.A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Boston, MA; Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. 9. Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (VUIIS), Nashville, TN, 37232, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, United States; Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37205, United States. 10. Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL. Electronic address: bgoodson@chem.siu.edu.
Abstract
Here we provide a full report on the construction, components, and capabilities of our consortium's "open-source" large-scale (~1L/h) (129)Xe hyperpolarizer for clinical, pre-clinical, and materials NMR/MRI (Nikolaou et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 14150 (2013)). The 'hyperpolarizer' is automated and built mostly of off-the-shelf components; moreover, it is designed to be cost-effective and installed in both research laboratories and clinical settings with materials costing less than $125,000. The device runs in the xenon-rich regime (up to 1800Torr Xe in 0.5L) in either stopped-flow or single-batch mode-making cryo-collection of the hyperpolarized gas unnecessary for many applications. In-cell (129)Xe nuclear spin polarization values of ~30%-90% have been measured for Xe loadings of ~300-1600Torr. Typical (129)Xe polarization build-up and T1 relaxation time constants were ~8.5min and ~1.9h respectively under our spin-exchange optical pumping conditions; such ratios, combined with near-unity Rb electron spin polarizations enabled by the high resonant laser power (up to ~200W), permit such high PXe values to be achieved despite the high in-cell Xe densities. Importantly, most of the polarization is maintained during efficient HP gas transfer to other containers, and ultra-long (129)Xe relaxation times (up to nearly 6h) were observed in Tedlar bags following transport to a clinical 3T scanner for MR spectroscopy and imaging as a prelude to in vivo experiments. The device has received FDA IND approval for a clinical study of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease subjects. The primary focus of this paper is on the technical/engineering development of the polarizer, with the explicit goals of facilitating the adaptation of design features and operative modes into other laboratories, and of spurring the further advancement of HP-gas MR applications in biomedicine.
pan class="Chemical">Here we provide a full repn>ort on tpan class="Chemical">he construction, components, and capabilities of our consortium's "open-source" large-scale (~1L/h) (129)Xe hyperpolarizer for clinical, pre-clinical, and materials NMR/MRI (Nikolaou et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 14150 (2013)). The 'hyperpolarizer' is automated and built mostly of off-the-shelf components; moreover, it is designed to be cost-effective and installed in both research laboratories and clinical settings with materials costing less than $125,000. The device runs in thexenon-rich regime (up to 1800Torr Xe in 0.5L) in either stopped-flow or single-batch mode-making cryo-collection of the hyperpolarized gas unnecessary for many applications. In-cell (129)Xe nuclear spin polarization values of ~30%-90% have been measured for Xe loadings of ~300-1600Torr. Typical (129)Xe polarization build-up and T1 relaxation time constants were ~8.5min and ~1.9h respectively under our spin-exchange optical pumping conditions; such ratios, combined with near-unity Rb electron spin polarizations enabled by the high resonant laser power (up to ~200W), permit such high PXe values to be achieved despite the high in-cell Xe densities. Importantly, most of the polarization is maintained during efficient HP gas transfer to other containers, and ultra-long (129)Xe relaxation times (up to nearly 6h) were observed in Tedlar bags following transport to a clinical 3T scanner for MR spectroscopy and imaging as a prelude to in vivo experiments. The device has received FDA IND approval for a clinical study of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease subjects. The primary focus of this paper is on the technical/engineering development of the polarizer, with the explicit goals of facilitating the adaptation of design features and operative modes into other laboratories, and of spurring the further advancement of HP-gas MR applications in biomedicine.
Authors: Harald E Möller; X Josette Chen; Brian Saam; Klaus D Hagspiel; G Allan Johnson; Talissa A Altes; Eduard E de Lange; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Mary L Mazzanti; Ronn P Walvick; Xin Zhou; Yanping Sun; Niral Shah; Joey Mansour; Jessica Gereige; Mitchell S Albert Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-07-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jason Graham Skinner; Luca Menichetti; Alessandra Flori; Anna Dost; Andreas Benjamin Schmidt; Markus Plaumann; Ferdia Aiden Gallagher; Jan-Bernd Hövener Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Laura L Walkup; Robert P Thomen; Teckla G Akinyi; Erin Watters; Kai Ruppert; John P Clancy; Jason C Woods; Zackary I Cleveland Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2016-08-05
Authors: Joseph W Plummer; Kiarash Emami; Andrew Dummer; Jason C Woods; Laura L Walkup; Zackary I Cleveland Journal: J Magn Reson Date: 2020-10-10 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Oleg G Salnikov; Panayiotis Nikolaou; Nuwandi M Ariyasingha; Kirill V Kovtunov; Igor V Koptyug; Eduard Y Chekmenev Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2019-03-20 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Aaron M Coffey; Matthew A Feldman; Roman V Shchepin; Danila A Barskiy; Milton L Truong; Wellington Pham; Eduard Y Chekmenev Journal: J Magn Reson Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Peter J Rayner; Michael J Burns; Alexandra M Olaru; Philip Norcott; Marianna Fekete; Gary G R Green; Louise A R Highton; Ryan E Mewis; Simon B Duckett Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-04-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Oleg G Salnikov; Kirill V Kovtunov; Panayiotis Nikolaou; Larisa M Kovtunova; Valerii I Bukhtiyarov; Igor V Koptyug; Eduard Y Chekmenev Journal: Chemphyschem Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 3.102