Literature DB >> 24631508

3D echocardiographic location of implantable device leads and mechanism of associated tricuspid regurgitation.

Anuj Mediratta1, Karima Addetia1, Megan Yamat1, Joshua D Moss1, Hemal M Nayak1, Martin C Burke1, Lynn Weinert1, Francesco Maffessanti1, Valluvan Jeevanandam1, Victor Mor-Avi1, Roberto M Lang2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to: 1) determine the feasibility of using 3-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (3D TTE) in patients with implantable cardiac resynchronization devices, pacemakers, and defibrillators to visualize the device leads in the right heart and their position relative to the tricuspid valve leaflets; 2) determine the prevalence of different lead positions; and 3) study the relationship between lead location and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) severity.
BACKGROUND: Pacemaker, defibrillator, and cardiac resynchronization device implantation is currently guided by fluoroscopy, not allowing targeted lead positioning relative to the tricuspid valve leaflets. These leads have been reported to cause TR of variable degrees, but echocardiography is not routinely used to elucidate the mechanisms of lead interference with tricuspid valve leaflets in individual patients.
METHODS: 3D TTE full-volume images of the right ventricle and/or zoomed images of the tricuspid valve were obtained in 121 patients with implanted devices. Images were viewed offline to determine the position of the device-lead relative to the tricuspid valve leaflets. Severity of TR was estimated on the basis of vena contracta measurements.
RESULTS: 3D TTE clearly depicted lead position in 90% of patients. The right ventricular lead was impinging on either the posterior (20%) or septal (23%) leaflet or was not interfering with leaflet motion (53%) when positioned near the posteroseptal commissure or in the central portion of the tricuspid valve orifice. In the remaining patients, leads were impinging on the anterior leaflet (4%) or positioned in either the anteroposterior or anteroseptal commissure (3%). Leads interfering with normal leaflet mobility were associated with more TR than nonimpinging leads (vena contracta: median 0.62 cm [1st and 3rd quartiles: 0.51, 0.84 cm] vs. 0.27 cm [1st and 3rd quartiles: 0.00, 0.48 cm]; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: 3D TTE showed a clear association between device lead position and TR. To minimize TR induced by device-leads, 3D TTE guidance should be considered for placement in a commissural position.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-dimensional echocardiography; intracardiac defibrillator; pacemaker; tricuspid regurgitation; tricuspid valve

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24631508     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  27 in total

Review 1.  Tricuspid valve incompetence following implantation of ventricular leads.

Authors:  Giselle A Baquero; Jerry Luck; Gerald V Naccarelli; Mario D Gonzalez; Javier E Banchs
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2015-04

2.  Impact of implantable transvenous device lead location on severity of tricuspid regurgitation.

Authors:  Karima Addetia; Francesco Maffessanti; Anuj Mediratta; Megan Yamat; Lynn Weinert; Joshua D Moss; Hemal M Nayak; Martin C Burke; Amit R Patel; Eric Kruse; Valluvan Jeevanandam; Victor Mor-Avi; Roberto M Lang
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 3.  [Application fields of intraoperative transesophageal 3D echocardiography].

Authors:  H Magunia; P Rosenberger
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Added value of transthoracic 2D echocardiographic en face view of the tricuspid valve.

Authors:  Matthias Schneider; Thomas Binder
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 1.704

5.  Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Interrogation of the Tricuspid Valve Using Knowledge Derived from Three-Dimensional Echocardiography.

Authors:  Karima Addetia; Megan Yamat; Anuj Mediratta; Diego Medvedofsky; Mita Patel; Preston Ferrara; Victor Mor-Avi; Roberto M Lang
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 5.251

6.  Pacemaker-induced tricuspid regurgitation is uncommon immediately post-implantation.

Authors:  Daniel P Rothschild; James A Goldstein; Nathan Kerner; Amr E Abbas; Meet Patel; Wai Shun Wong
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Reply: Tricuspid regurgitation severity associated with positioning of RV lead or other etiology assessed by intracardiac echocardiography.

Authors:  Anuj Mediratta; Karima Addetia; Roberto M Lang
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-12

8.  Tricuspid regurgitation severity associated with positioning of RV lead or other etiology assessed by intracardiac echocardiography.

Authors:  Jian-Fang Ren; David J Callans; Francis E Marchlinski
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-12

Review 9.  Current Clinical Applications of Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: When the Technique Makes the Difference.

Authors:  Elena Surkova; Denisa Muraru; Patrizia Aruta; Gabriella Romeo; Jurate Bidviene; Diana Cherata; Luigi P Badano
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Tricuspid Regurgitation and Mortality in Patients With Transvenous Permanent Pacemaker Leads.

Authors:  Francesca N Delling; Zena K Hassan; Gail Piatkowski; Connie W Tsao; Alefiyah Rajabali; Lawrence J Markson; Peter J Zimetbaum; Warren J Manning; James D Chang; Kenneth J Mukamal
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.