Roongsak Limthongthang1, Abdo Bachoura2, Sidney M Jacoby2, A Lee Osterman2. 1. Philadelphia Hand Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. Electronic address: roongsak.lit@mahidol.ac.th. 2. Philadelphia Hand Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Flexor pollicis longus (FPL) tendon rupture is a well-documented complication related to the use of distal radius volar locking plates (VLPs). The final common pathway of flexor tendon rupture appears to involve implants prominent at the watershed line. We hypothesized that significant differences in VLP prominence exist between various plate designs. METHODS: Ten fresh frozen specimens were dissected to identify the path of the FPL in relationship to the distal radius at the watershed line. Five VLP designs were fixed to each specimen based on their anatomic fit, and slid distally until the distal edge of the plate reached the watershed line. The position of each fixed plate was evaluated by fluoroscopy. We used a 3-dimensional laser scanner to create computer models. The total surface area of plate prominence volar to the watershed line and the prominent area beneath the FPL were measured in the axial plane using computer software. RESULTS: At the watershed line, the FPL was located at 54% of the maximal width of the radius, as measured from its volar-ulnar corner. There were no significant differences in the location of plate fixation on lateral view radiographs according to the classification of Soong et al. The mean total surface area of plate prominence was 36 mm(2). The mean prominent area beneath the FPL was 10 mm2. Significant differences in plate prominence were noted for various designs. CONCLUSIONS: Despite optimal plate placement, various VLP designs were observed to have prominent profiles volar to the watershed line, to varying extents. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results raise concerns regarding interference between all of the analyzed VLP designs and the FPL. This study may help guide both implant design considerations and assist the surgeon in better understanding implant morphology as it relates to iatrogenic flexor tendon injury.
PURPOSE: Flexor pollicis longus (FPL) tendon rupture is a well-documented complication related to the use of distal radius volar locking plates (VLPs). The final common pathway of flexor tendon rupture appears to involve implants prominent at the watershed line. We hypothesized that significant differences in VLP prominence exist between various plate designs. METHODS: Ten fresh frozen specimens were dissected to identify the path of the FPL in relationship to the distal radius at the watershed line. Five VLP designs were fixed to each specimen based on their anatomic fit, and slid distally until the distal edge of the plate reached the watershed line. The position of each fixed plate was evaluated by fluoroscopy. We used a 3-dimensional laser scanner to create computer models. The total surface area of plate prominence volar to the watershed line and the prominent area beneath the FPL were measured in the axial plane using computer software. RESULTS: At the watershed line, the FPL was located at 54% of the maximal width of the radius, as measured from its volar-ulnar corner. There were no significant differences in the location of plate fixation on lateral view radiographs according to the classification of Soong et al. The mean total surface area of plate prominence was 36 mm(2). The mean prominent area beneath the FPL was 10 mm2. Significant differences in plate prominence were noted for various designs. CONCLUSIONS: Despite optimal plate placement, various VLP designs were observed to have prominent profiles volar to the watershed line, to varying extents. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results raise concerns regarding interference between all of the analyzed VLP designs and the FPL. This study may help guide both implant design considerations and assist the surgeon in better understanding implant morphology as it relates to iatrogenic flexor tendon injury.