Literature DB >> 24630304

Variability in protein binding of teicoplanin and achievement of therapeutic drug monitoring targets in critically ill patients: lessons from the DALI Study.

J A Roberts1, V Stove2, J J De Waele2, B Sipinkoski3, B McWhinney3, J P J Ungerer3, M Akova4, M Bassetti5, G Dimopoulos6, K-M Kaukonen7, D Koulenti8, C Martin9, P Montravers10, J Rello11, A Rhodes12, T Starr13, S C Wallis13, J Lipman14.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to describe the variability in protein binding of teicoplanin in critically ill patients as well as the number of patients achieving therapeutic target concentrations. This report is part of the multinational pharmacokinetic DALI Study. Patients were sampled on a single day, with blood samples taken both at the midpoint and the end of the dosing interval. Total and unbound teicoplanin concentrations were assayed using validated chromatographic methods. The lower therapeutic range of teicoplanin was defined as total trough concentrations from 10 to 20 mg/L and the higher range as 10-30 mg/L. Thirteen critically ill patients were available for analysis. The following are the median (interquartile range) total and free concentrations (mg/L): midpoint, total 13.6 (11.2-26.0) and free 1.5 (0.7-2.5); trough, total 11.9 (10.2-22.7) and free 1.8 (0.6-2.6). The percentage free teicoplanin for the mid-dose and trough time points was 6.9% (4.5-15.6%) and 8.2% (5.5-16.4%), respectively. The correlation between total and free antibiotic concentrations was moderate for both the midpoint (ρ = 0.79, P = 0.0021) and trough (ρ = 0.63, P = 0.027). Only 42% and 58% of patients were in the lower and higher therapeutic ranges, respectively. In conclusion, use of standard dosing for teicoplanin leads to inappropriate concentrations in a high proportion of critically ill patients. Variability in teicoplanin protein binding is very high, placing significant doubt on the validity of total concentrations for therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill patients.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotics; Critically ill patients; Glycopeptides; Hypoalbuminaemia; ICU; Pharmacokinetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24630304     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.01.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  11 in total

Review 1.  Understanding PK/PD.

Authors:  Jason A Roberts; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Amikacin dosing in the ICU: we now know more, but still not enough….

Authors:  Francesco G De Rosa; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Variability in Trough Total and Unbound Teicoplanin Concentrations and Achievement of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Targets in Adult Patients with Hematological Malignancy.

Authors:  Catherine J Byrne; Jason A Roberts; Brett McWhinney; Jerome P Fennell; Philomena O'Byrne; Evelyn Deasy; Sean Egan; Ronan Desmond; Helen Enright; Sheila A Ryder; Deirdre M D'Arcy; Johnny McHugh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Teicoplanin biosynthesis: unraveling the interplay of structural, regulatory, and resistance genes.

Authors:  Oleksandr Yushchuk; Bohdan Ostash; Andrew W Truman; Flavia Marinelli; Victor Fedorenko
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 5.560

5.  Clinical practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of teicoplanin: a consensus review by the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

Authors:  Yuki Hanai; Yoshiko Takahashi; Takashi Niwa; Toshihiko Mayumi; Yukihiro Hamada; Toshimi Kimura; Kazuaki Matsumoto; Satoshi Fujii; Yoshio Takesue
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Pharmacokinetics and Target Attainment of Antibiotics in Critically Ill Children: A Systematic Review of Current Literature.

Authors:  Stan J F Hartman; Roger J Brüggemann; Lynn Orriëns; Nada Dia; Michiel F Schreuder; Saskia N de Wildt
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Antimicrobial therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill adult patients: a Position Paper.

Authors:  Mohd H Abdul-Aziz; Jan-Willem C Alffenaar; Matteo Bassetti; Hendrik Bracht; George Dimopoulos; Deborah Marriott; Michael N Neely; Jose-Artur Paiva; Federico Pea; Fredrik Sjovall; Jean F Timsit; Andrew A Udy; Sebastian G Wicha; Markus Zeitlinger; Jan J De Waele; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Clinical efficacy and safety in patients treated with teicoplanin with a target trough concentration of 20 μg/mL using a regimen of 12 mg/kg for five doses within the initial 3 days.

Authors:  Takashi Ueda; Yoshio Takesue; Kazuhiko Nakajima; Kaoru Ichiki; Kaori Ishikawa; Yoshiko Takai; Kumiko Yamada; Toshie Tsuchida; Naruhito Otani; Yoshiko Takahashi; Mika Ishihara; Shingo Takubo; Hiroki Ikeuchi; Motoi Uchino; Takeshi Kimura
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.483

9.  Therapeutic Drug Level Monitoring of Teicoplanin in Korean Pediatric Patients with Normal versus Impaired Renal Function.

Authors:  Joon Sik Choi; Jong Min Kim; Dongsub Kim; Si Ho Kim; Heeyeon Cho; Hyung Doo Park; Soo Youn Lee; Cheol In Kang; Yae Jean Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Quantification of Teicoplanin Using the HPLC-UV Method for Clinical Applications in Critically Ill Patients in Korea.

Authors:  Jaeok Lee; Eun-Kyoung Chung; Sung-Wook Kang; Hwa-Jeong Lee; Sandy-Jeong Rhie
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 6.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.