| Literature DB >> 24629134 |
Fábio Pinheiro1, Salvatore Cozzolino, David Draper, Fábio de Barros, Leonardo P Félix, Michael F Fay, Clarisse Palma-Silva.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Because of their fragmented nature, inselberg species are interesting biological models for studying the genetic consequences of disjoint populations. Inselbergs are commonly compared with oceanic islands, as most of them display a marked ecological isolation from the surrounding area. The isolation of these rock outcrops is reflected in the high number of recorded endemic species and the strong floristic differences between individual inselbergs and adjacent habitats. We examined the genetic connectivity of orchids Epidendrum cinnabarinum and E. secundum adapted to Neotropical inselbergs of northeastern Brazil. Our goals were to identify major genetic divergences or disjunctions across the range of the species and to investigate potential demographic and evolutionary mechanisms leading to lineage divergence in Neotropical mountain ecosystems.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24629134 PMCID: PMC4004418 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-14-49
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Geographic distribution of sampled populations. Maps showing sampled populations of Epidendrum cinnabarinum(A) and E. secundum(B), and respective plastid DNA networks for each species (C and D). Pie charts reflect the frequency of occurrence of each haplotype in each population. Haplotype colours correspond to those shown in networks. Pie charts with solid and broken outlines indicate Caatinga and Brazilian Atlantic Forest populations, respectively. Nuclear genetic groups are indicated for E. secundum (Nuclear cluster 1 – black; Nuclear cluster 2 – grey). In the statistical parsimony networks (C and D), the haplotype frequencies are proportional to circle sizes. The number of mutations required to explain transitions among haplotypes is indicated along the lines connecting the haplotypes by cross hatches.
Genetic characterization of populations of and based on plastid markers
| | | | | |
| Mamanguape | MA | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Serraria | RR | 2 | 0.990 | 0.505 |
| Esperança | ES | 2 | 0.966 | 0.456 |
| Queimadas | QE | 2 | 0.583 | 0.167 |
| Jaqueira | JA | 2 | 0.904 | 0.363 |
| Cabo de Santo Agostinho | CB | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Pirambu | PI | 5 | 3.066 | 0.813 |
| Abaeté | AB | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| | | | | |
| Maranguape | CE | 2 | 1.000 | 0.337 |
| Brejo da Madre de Deus | DE | 2 | 0.800 | 0.100 |
| Serra de Itabaiana | TB | 2 | 0.800 | 0.100 |
| Morro do Chapéu | MC | 5 | 4.000 | 0.767 |
| Palmeiras | PL | 6 | 4.873 | 0.800 |
| Serra da Jibóia | JI | 2 | 0.996 | 0.268 |
| Sympatric | | | | |
| Pedra de Santo Antonio ( | TO | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Pedra de Santo Antonio ( | | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bezerros ( | BZ | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bezerros ( | | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Camocim de São Félix ( | FE | 2 | 0.978 | 0.479 |
| Camocim de São Félix ( | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
Identification code of sampled populations (ID), number of haplotypes (NH), haplotype richness (HR) and haplotype diversity (HD) for seven loci.
Genetic characterization of populations of based on nuclear markers
| Pedra de Santo Antonio/TO | 19 | 1 | 2.28 | 0.11 | 0.462 | 0.156 | 0.872 |
| Brejo da Madre de Deus/DE | 22 | 0 | 2.35 | 0.19 | 0.466 | 0.073 | 0.895 |
| Bezerros/BZ | 20 | 2 | 2.29 | 0.22 | 0.442 | -0.065 | 0.785 |
| Camocim de São Félix/FE | 23 | 9 | 2.39 | 0.35 | 0.459 | 0.154 | 0.794 |
| Morro do Chapéu/MC | 22 | 11 | 2.77 | 0.72 | 0.608 | -0.032 | 0.875 |
1Departures of within-population inbreeding coefficients (f) from HWE were not detected; 2A population is considered to have undergone a bottleneck if its M-ratio value falls below the lower threshold of critical M-ratio (Mc = 0.625) showed on Table 4; 3No bottlenecks detected.
Populations sampled, number of alleles (A), number of private alleles (PA), allelic richness (AR), private allelic richness (PAR), expected heterozygosity (HE), the within population inbreeding coefficient f and the M-ratio values for six nuclear loci.
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for nuclear and plastid microsatellite data for populations, using four different models
| | | | | |
| 1) Among populations | 4 | 0.97604 | 4.58 | |
| Within populations | 187 | 20.33329 | 95.42 | |
| 2) Between Chapada Diamantina and Planalto da Borborema ecoregions | 1 | 1.75359 | 7.81 | |
| Among populations within biomes | 3 | 0.36609 | 1.63 | |
| Within populations | 187 | 20.33329 | 90.56 | |
| | | | | |
| 1) Among populations | 8 | 0.22274 | 63.64 | |
| Within populations | 165 | 0.12727 | 36.36 | |
| 2) Between Biomes (Caatinga and Brazilian Atlantic Forest) | 1 | 0.00302 | 0.86 | |
| Among populations within biomes | 7 | 0.22154 | 62.97 | |
| Within populations | 165 | 0.12727 | 36.17 | |
| 3) Between Chapada Diamantina and Planalto da Borborema ecoregions | 1 | 0.05130 | 11.61 | |
| Among populations within biomes | 4 | 0.25806 | 58.42 | |
| Within populations | 108 | 0.13241 | 29.97 | |
| 4) Between Chapada Diamantina and remaining populations | 1 | 0.85932 | 61.21 | |
| Among populations within groups | 7 | 0.22273 | 15.87 | |
| Within populations | 165 | 0.32182 | 22.92 |
First model with all populations pooled, second model with populations from different biomes (Caatinga and Brazilian Atlantic Forest) separated, third model with populations from Chapada Diamantina and Planalto da Borborema ecoregions separated, and fourth model with populations from Chapada Diamantina separated from the remaining localities.
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for plastid microsatellite data for populations, using two different models
| 1) Among populations | 10 | 0.23999 | 64.41 | |
| Within populations | 166 | 0.13262 | 35.59 | |
| 2) Between Biomes (Caatinga and Brazilian Atlantic Forest) | 1 | -0.03251 | -9.10 | |
| Among populations within biomes | 9 | 0.25725 | 71.99 | |
| Within populations | 166 | 0.13262 | 37.11 |
One model includes all populations pooled, and the other includes populations from different biomes (Caatinga and Brazilian Atlantic Forest) separated.
Figure 2Genetic assignment results. Summary of population structure in Epidendrum secundum using Bayesian assignment analysis for a K = 2 population model. Most individuals from population Bezerros show assignment probabilities associated to cluster 1 (black), whereas specimens from population Morro do Chapéu are mainly classified on cluster 2 (grey). Admixed proportions were found on populations Brejo da Madre de Deus, Pedra de Santo Antonio and Camocim de São Félix. The ecoregion of origin (Chapada Diamantina or Planalto da Borborema) is indicated. See Table 1 for population details.
Demographic reduction (bottleneck) results
| 1 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 0.883 |
| 2 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 0.800 |
| 3 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 3.5 | 0.777 |
| 4 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 3.5 | 0.623 |
| 5 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 0.875 |
| 6 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 0.825 |
| 7 | 2.0 | 0.1 | 3.5 | 0.722 |
| 8 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 3.5 | 0.589 |
| 9 | 10.0 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 0.844 |
| 10 | 10.0 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 0.811 |
| 11 | 10.0 | 0.1 | 3.5 | 0.702 |
| 12 | 10.0 | 0.3 | 3.5 | 0.619 |
Parameters for the two-phased mutation model (TPM) used to generate critical values of M-ratio (Mc). Theta (θ), proportion of single-step mutations (pg) and average size of non one-step mutations (Δg) were used to infer Mc thresholds.
Figure 3Environmental envelope models results. Maps showing environmental envelope models (EEMs) for Epidendrum cinnabarinum (blue, AUC = 0.968) and E. secundum (green, AUC = 0.969) based on current (A and D) and two past scenarios, the Last Glacial Maximum (B and E) and Last inter-glacial (C and F) using the Maximum Entropy algorithm v. 3.3.3e. Black dots indicate localities used for EEMs analysis, and yellow dots indicates populations sampled for genetic analysis. Darker colors show areas with more suitable predicted conditions, as indicated by blue (E. cinnabarinum) and green scales (E. secundum). See Table 1 for population details.
Geographic location and habitat description of sampled populations
| | | | | | | ||
| | | | | | | | |
| Mamanguape | MA | 6.789 | 34.942 | 50 | Sand dune scrub vegetation/BAF | - | 24 |
| Serraria | RR | 6.827 | 35.638 | 553 | Rock outcrop within mesic forest enclave/CAA | - | 20 |
| Esperança | ES | 7.009 | 35.899 | 681 | Rock outcrop surrounded by SDTF/CAA | - | 19 |
| Queimadas | QE | 7.351 | 35.900 | 497 | Rock outcrop surrounded by SDTF/ CAA | - | 12 |
| Jaqueira | JA | 8.740 | 35.792 | 720 | Rock outcrop surrounded by forest/BAF | - | 14 |
| Cabo de Santo Agostinho | CB | 8.217 | 35.003 | 116 | Rock outcrop surrounded by forest/BAF | - | 7 |
| Pirambu | PI | 10.61 | 36.867 | 97 | Shrubby Tabuleiro vegetation/BAF | - | 14 |
| Abaeté | AB | 12.946 | 38.357 | 38 | Sand dune scrub vegetation/BAF | - | 11 |
| | | | | | | | |
| Maranguape | CE | 3.894 | 38.722 | 984 | Rock outcrop within mesic forest enclave/CAA | - | 20 |
| Brejo da Madre de Deus | DE | 8.200 | 36.403 | 1094 | Rock outcrop within mesic forest enclave/CAA | 20 | 20 |
| Serra de Itabaiana | TB | 10.739 | 37.364 | 572 | Rock outcrop surrounded by forest/BAF | - | 20 |
| Morro do Chapéu | MC | 11.551 | 41.155 | 913 | Rock outcrop surrounded by SDTF/CAA | 16 | 16 |
| Palmeiras | PL | 12.476 | 41.452 | 1082 | Rock outcrop surrounded by SDTF/CAA | - | 20 |
| Serra da Jibóia | JI | 12.854 | 39.476 | 824 | Rock outcrop surrounded by forest/BAF | - | 20 |
| Sympatric populations | | | | | | - | |
| Pedra de Santo Antonio (C) | TO | 7.344 | 35.798 | 709 | Rock outcrop surrounded by SDTF/CAA | - | 15 |
| Pedra de Santo Antonio (S) | | | | | | 20 | 20 |
| Bezerros (C) | BZ | 8.151 | 35.756 | 837 | Rock outcrop within mesic forest enclave/CAA | - | 21 |
| Bezerros (S) | | | | | | 20 | 20 |
| Camocim de São Félix (C) | FE | 8.328 | 35.754 | 718 | Rock outcrop surrounded by SDTF/CAA | - | 20 |
| Camocim de São Félix (S) | | | | | | 20 | 18 |
| Total | 96 | 351 | |||||
1SDTF – Seasonal Dry Tropical Forest;
Populations sampled with their identification code (ID), elevation above sea level, habitat description and sample size, analysed for nuclear and plastid markers in Epidendrum cinnabarinum (C) and E. secundum (S) from Northeast Brazil, distributed in the Caatinga (CAA) and Brazilian Atlantic Forest (BAF) biomes. Populations are indicated as shown on the maps in Figure 1A and B.