| Literature DB >> 28690800 |
Karina Vanessa Hmeljevski1, Alison Gonçalves Nazareno2, Marcelo Leandro Bueno3, Maurício Sedrez Dos Reis4, Rafaela Campostrini Forzza1.
Abstract
Here, we explore the historical and contemporaneous patterns of connectivity among Encholirium horridum populations located on granitic inselbergs in an Ocbil landscape within the Brazilian Atlantic Forest, using both nuclear and chloroplast microsatellite markers. Beyond to assess the E. horridum population genetic structure, we built species distribution models across four periods (current conditions, mid-Holocene, Last Glacial Maximum [LGM], and Last Interglacial) and inferred putative dispersal corridors using a least-cost path analysis to elucidate biogeographic patterns. Overall, high and significant genetic divergence was estimated among populations for both nuclear and plastid DNA (ΦST(n) = 0.463 and ΦST(plastid) = 0.961, respectively, p < .001). For nuclear genome, almost total absence of genetic admixture among populations and very low migration rates were evident, corroborating with the very low estimates of immigration and emigration rates observed among E. horridum populations. Based on the cpDNA results, putative dispersal routes in Sugar Loaf Land across cycles of climatic fluctuations in the Quaternary period revealed that the populations' connectivity changed little during those events. Genetic analyses highlighted the low genetic connectivity and long-term persistence of populations, and the founder effect and genetic drift seemed to have been very important processes that shaped the current diversity and genetic structure observed in both genomes. The genetic singularity of each population clearly shows the need for in situ conservation of all of them.Entities:
Keywords: Atlantic Forest; Encholirium horridum; conservation genetics; gene flow; landscape genetics; phylogeography; species distribution models
Year: 2017 PMID: 28690800 PMCID: PMC5496560 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3038
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Geographic distribution of Encholirium horridum L.B.Sm. sampled populations and respective plastid network (A). Pie charts reflect the frequency of occurrence of each haplotype in each population. Haplotype colors correspond to those shown in networks. In the statistical Median‐Joining network, the haplotype frequencies are proportional to circle size. The number of mutations required to explain transitions among haplotypes is indicated along the lines connecting the haplotypes by cross hatches. Small black circles correspond to unsampled or extinct intermediate haplotypes
Sampling locations in Sugar Loaf Land, Brazil, including population name, geographic region (City and State), latitude and longitude coordinates, and voucher information for Encholirium horridum L.B.Sm
| Population | City | State | Lat S | Long W | Voucher |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GT | Guaratinga | BA | 16°36′ | 39°47′ | Daneu 377 (CEPEC) |
| CC | Carlos Chagas | MG | 17°52′ | 41°03′ | Forzza 5775 (RB) |
| EC | Ecoporanga | ES | 18°11′ | 40°40′ | Forzza 5788 (RB) |
| AD | Água Doce do Norte | ES | 18°34′ | 40°59′ | Forzza 5811 (RB) |
| VP | Vila Pavão | ES | 18°38′ | 40°35′ | Forzza 5794 (RB) |
| PA | Pancas | ES | 19°14′ | 40°48′ | Forzza 5838 (RB) |
| CO | Colatina | ES | 19°33′ | 40°32′ |
|
| MA | Marliéria | MG | 19°42′ | 42°42′ | Martinelli 15163 (RB) |
| MU | Mutum | MG | 19°56′ | 41°29′ | Forzza 6057 (RB) |
| VV | Vila Velha | ES | 20°19′ | 40°19′ | Forzza 6083 (RB) |
| CA | Campos | RJ | 21°20′ | 41°22′ | Forzza 6086 (RBvb) |
States: BA, Bahia; MG, Minas Gerais; ES, Espírito Santo; RJ, Rio de Janeiro. Herbarium collections: CEPEC, Cocoa Research Center/BA; RB, Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden/RJ; RBvb, Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden Bromeliarium.
There was no fertile individual at the time of sampling.
Genetic diversity of the 11 Encholirium horridum L.B.Sm. populations sampled in Sugar Loaf Land, Brazil
| Pop |
| Nuclear microsatellites | Chloroplast microsatellites | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Haplotypes |
| ||
| GT | 53 | 20 | 2.38 | 4 | 5 | 0.259 | 0.429 | 0.139 | 20 | H1 | 0.000 |
| CC | 50 | 72 | 8.41 | 11 | 34 | 0.668 | 0.106 | −0.029 | 20 | H2 | 0.000 |
| EC | 50 | 15 | 1.79 | 0 | 3 | 0.169 | 0.365 | 0.229 | 20 | H3 | 0.000 |
| AD | 47 | 75 | 8.97 | 10 | 36 | 0.747 | 0.239 | 0.018 | 20 | H4, H5 | 0.337 |
| VP | 50 | 95 | 11.05 | 17 | 52 | 0.833 | 0.248 | 0.092 | 20 | H6 | 0.000 |
| PA | 50 | 64 | 7.55 | 11 | 30 | 0.696 | 0.150 | 0.074 | 21 | H1, H7 | 0.181 |
| CO | 53 | 27 | 3.25 | 0 | 6 | 0.429 | 0.226 | 0.095 | 20 | H8 | 0.000 |
| MA | 35 | 12 | 1.50 | 1 | 1 | 0.192 | 0.221 | −0.282 | 20 | H4 | 0.000 |
| MU | 50 | 64 | 7.69 | 15 | 27 | 0.725 | 0.123 | 0.025 | 20 | H9 | 0.000 |
| VV | 50 | 34 | 4.02 | 1 | 14 | 0.373 | 0.163 | 0.002 | 20 | H10, H11 | 0.189 |
| CA | 38 | 10 | 1.24 | 1 | 2 | 0.010 | −0.009 | – | 20 | H9 | 0.000 |
| Average | 48 | 44 | 5.26 | 6 | 19 | 0.464 | 0.206 | 0.036 | 20 | 0.064 | |
See Table 1 for the names of the populations.
n, sampling size; A, number of alleles; R, allelic richness by rarefaction based on the minimum sample size of 35 individuals; A P, number of private alleles; A R, number of rare alleles (frequency <0.05); H , expected heterozygosity (genetic diversity); F IS, inbreeding coefficient; F IS 1, inbreeding coefficient excluding loci with presence of null alleles; h, haplotypic diversity. H1–H11 corresponds to a different haplotype.
Significant values are followed by *.
Figure 2Mantel's test between /(1–F ST) and Euclidian geographic distance log (Km)
Figure 3Proportion of multilocus genotype of Encholirium horridum L.B.Sm. for K = 12 and K = 11 genetic groups detected by the software STRUCTURE. Distinct colors represent distinct genetic groups. See Table 1 for abbreviations of populations
Summary of net immigration and emigration rates among populations of Encholirium horridum L.B.Sm in Sugar Loaf Land, Brazil
| Population | Total emigration | Total immigration | Net emigration | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short term | Long term | Short term | Long term | Short term | Long term | |
| GT | 0.055 | 0.018 | 0.058 | 0.018 | −0.003 | +0.000 |
| CC | 0.058 | 0.070 | 0.058 | 0.095 | −0.001 | −0.025 |
| EC | 0.056 | 0.049 | 0.061 | 0.023 | −0.005 | +0.026 |
| AD | 0.059 | 0.066 | 0.059 | 0.073 | +0.001 | −0.007 |
| VP | 0.055 | 0.056 | 0.058 | 0.099 | −0.003 | −0.043 |
| PA | 0.055 | 0.050 | 0.059 | 0.045 | −0.003 | +0.005 |
| CO | 0.055 | 0.051 | 0.058 | 0.054 | −0.004 | −0.003 |
| MA | 0.072 | 0.041 | 0.057 | 0.031 | +0.016 | +0.010 |
| MU | 0.055 | 0.066 | 0.058 | 0.066 | −0.004 | +0.000 |
| VV | 0.054 | 0.076 | 0.058 | 0.053 | −0.004 | +0.023 |
| CA | 0.068 | 0.044 | 0.057 | 0.030 | +0.011 | +0.015 |
See Table 1 for the names of the populations.
Net emigration = sum of all emigration rates minus the sum of all immigration rates.
Figure 4Potential dispersal routes of Encholirium horridum L.B.Sm in Sugar Loaf Land across four time periods, based on plastid genome microsatellite markers. (a) Last Interglacial (~120 kyr BP), (b) Last Glacial Maximum (~21 kyr BP), (c) mid‐Holocene (~6 kyr BP), and (d) current conditions