Literature DB >> 24628660

Fine-mapping natural alleles: quantitative complementation to the rescue.

Thomas L Turner1.   

Abstract

Mapping the genes responsible for natural variation and divergence is a challenging task. Many studies have mapped genes to genomic regions or generated lists of candidates, but few studies have implicated specific genes with a high standard of evidence. I propose that combining recent advances in genomic engineering with a modified version of the quantitative complementation test will help turn candidate genes into causal genes. By creating loss-of-function mutations in natural strains, and using these mutations to quantitatively fail-to-complement natural alleles, fine mapping should be greatly facilitated. As an example, I propose that the CRISPR/Cas9 system could be combined with the FLP/FRT system to fine-map genes in the numerous systems where inversions have frustrated these efforts.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR; QTL mapping; inversions; quantitative complementation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24628660      PMCID: PMC4036590          DOI: 10.1111/mec.12719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  47 in total

1.  Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species.

Authors:  M A Noor; K L Grams; L A Bertucci; J Reiland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Rules of nonallelic noncomplementation at the synapse in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  K J Yook; S R Proulx; E M Jorgensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Beyond Mendel: an evolving view of human genetic disease transmission.

Authors:  Jose L Badano; Nicholas Katsanis
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 4.  How good are quantitative complementation tests?

Authors:  Philip M Service
Journal:  Sci Aging Knowledge Environ       Date:  2004-03-24

5.  A fine-scale genetic analysis of hybrid incompatibilities in Drosophila.

Authors:  Daven C Presgraves
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Evidence for inversion polymorphism related to sympatric host race formation in the apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Feder; Joseph B Roethele; Kenneth Filchak; Julie Niedbalski; Jeanne Romero-Severson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Quantitative trait loci responsible for variation in sexually dimorphic traits in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Artyom Kopp; Rita M Graze; Shizhong Xu; Sean B Carroll; Sergey V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Dopa decarboxylase (Ddc) affects variation in Drosophila longevity.

Authors:  Maria De Luca; Nataliya V Roshina; Gretchen L Geiger-Thornsberry; Richard F Lyman; Elena G Pasyukova; Trudy F C Mackay
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  A polytene chromosome analysis of the Anopheles gambiae species complex.

Authors:  Mario Coluzzi; Adriana Sabatini; Alessandra della Torre; Maria Angela Di Deco; Vincenzo Petrarca
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-10-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  A perspective on micro-evo-devo: progress and potential.

Authors:  Maria D S Nunes; Saad Arif; Christian Schlötterer; Alistair P McGregor
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  20 in total

1.  Combining linkage and association mapping identifies RECEPTOR-LIKE PROTEIN KINASE1 as an essential Arabidopsis shoot regeneration gene.

Authors:  Hans Motte; Annelies Vercauteren; Stephen Depuydt; Sofie Landschoot; Danny Geelen; Stefaan Werbrouck; Sofie Goormachtig; Marnik Vuylsteke; Danny Vereecke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A genomic perspective on the generation and maintenance of genetic diversity in herbivorous insects.

Authors:  Andrew D Gloss; Simon C Groen; Noah K Whiteman
Journal:  Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 13.915

Review 3.  Pleiotropy, constraint, and modularity in the evolution of life histories: insights from genomic analyses.

Authors:  Kimberly A Hughes; Jeff Leips
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Multiple genetic loci affect place learning and memory performance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Patricka A Williams-Simon; Christopher Posey; Samuel Mitchell; Enoch Ng'oma; James A Mrkvicka; Troy Zars; Elizabeth G King
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.449

Review 5.  Facilitating Complex Trait Analysis via Reduced Complexity Crosses.

Authors:  Camron D Bryant; Desmond J Smith; Kathleen M Kantak; Thaddeus S Nowak; Robert W Williams; M Imad Damaj; Eva E Redei; Hao Chen; Megan K Mulligan
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 6.  Higher-order genetic interactions and their contribution to complex traits.

Authors:  Matthew B Taylor; Ian M Ehrenreich
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 7.  Towards the identification of the loci of adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Carolina Pardo-Diaz; Camilo Salazar; Chris D Jiggins
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 7.781

Review 8.  Life-History Evolution and the Genetics of Fitness Components in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Thomas Flatt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Natural Genetic Variation and Candidate Genes for Morphological Traits in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Valeria Paula Carreira; Julián Mensch; Esteban Hasson; Juan José Fanara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Mapping QTL Contributing to Variation in Posterior Lobe Morphology between Strains of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hackett; Xiaofei Wang; Brittny R Smith; Stuart J Macdonald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.