Literature DB >> 31095869

Multiple genetic loci affect place learning and memory performance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Patricka A Williams-Simon1, Christopher Posey1, Samuel Mitchell1, Enoch Ng'oma1, James A Mrkvicka1, Troy Zars1, Elizabeth G King1.   

Abstract

Learning and memory are critical functions for all animals, giving individuals the ability to respond to changes in their environment. Within populations, individuals vary, however the mechanisms underlying this variation in performance are largely unknown. Thus, it remains to be determined what genetic factors cause an individual to have high learning ability and what factors determine how well an individual will remember what they have learned. To genetically dissect learning and memory performance, we used the Drosophila synthetic population resource (DSPR), a multiparent mapping resource in the model system Drosophila melanogaster, consisting of a large set of recombinant inbred lines (RILs) that naturally vary in these and other traits. Fruit flies can be trained in a "heat box" to learn to remain on one side of a chamber (place learning) and can remember this (place memory) over short timescales. Using this paradigm, we measured place learning and memory for ~49 000 individual flies from over 700 DSPR RILs. We identified 16 different loci across the genome that significantly affect place learning and/or memory performance, with 5 of these loci affecting both traits. To identify transcriptomic differences associated with performance, we performed RNA-Seq on pooled samples of seven high performing and seven low performing RILs for both learning and memory and identified hundreds of genes with differences in expression in the two sets. Integrating our transcriptomic results with the mapping results allowed us to identify nine promising candidate genes, advancing our understanding of the genetic basis underlying natural variation in learning and memory performance.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and International Behavioural and Neural Genetics Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Drosophila melanogaster; QTL; differential gene expression; learning; memory; multiparental population

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31095869      PMCID: PMC6718298          DOI: 10.1111/gbb.12581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Brain Behav        ISSN: 1601-183X            Impact factor:   3.449


  107 in total

1.  The relationship between dominance, corticosterone, memory, and food caching in mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli).

Authors:  Vladimir V Pravosudov; Sally P Mendoza; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.587

2.  Altered histone acetylation is associated with age-dependent memory impairment in mice.

Authors:  Shahaf Peleg; Farahnaz Sananbenesi; Athanasios Zovoilis; Susanne Burkhardt; Sanaz Bahari-Javan; Roberto Carlos Agis-Balboa; Perla Cota; Jessica Lee Wittnam; Andreas Gogol-Doering; Lennart Opitz; Gabriella Salinas-Riester; Markus Dettenhofer; Hui Kang; Laurent Farinelli; Wei Chen; André Fischer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Drosophila bristles and the nature of quantitative genetic variation.

Authors:  Trudy F Mackay; Richard F Lyman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown.

Authors:  Mihaela Pertea; Daehwan Kim; Geo M Pertea; Jeffrey T Leek; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  Experimental evolution of learning ability in fruit flies.

Authors:  Frederic Mery; Tadeusz J Kawecki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Genetic mapping of variation in spatial learning in the mouse.

Authors:  Daniela Steinberger; David S Reynolds; Pushpindar Ferris; Rachael Lincoln; Susmita Datta; Joanna Stanley; Andrea Paterson; Gerard R Dawson; Jonathan Flint
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Influence of the White locus on the courtship behavior of Drosophila males.

Authors:  Dimitrije Krstic; Werner Boll; Markus Noll
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2.

Authors:  Michael I Love; Wolfgang Huber; Simon Anders
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Cellular diversity in the Drosophila midbrain revealed by single-cell transcriptomics.

Authors:  Vincent Croset; Christoph D Treiber; Scott Waddell
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 10.  FlyBase 2.0: the next generation.

Authors:  Jim Thurmond; Joshua L Goodman; Victor B Strelets; Helen Attrill; L Sian Gramates; Steven J Marygold; Beverley B Matthews; Gillian Millburn; Giulia Antonazzo; Vitor Trovisco; Thomas C Kaufman; Brian R Calvi
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Finding a place and leaving a mark in memory formation.

Authors:  Divya Sitaraman; Holly LaFerriere
Journal:  J Neurogenet       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 1.250

2.  Genome annotation with long RNA reads reveals new patterns of gene expression and improves single-cell analyses in an ant brain.

Authors:  Emily J Shields; Masato Sorida; Lihong Sheng; Bogdan Sieriebriennikov; Long Ding; Roberto Bonasio
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 7.431

Review 3.  The Evolutionary Relevance of Social Learning and Transmission in Non-Social Arthropods with a Focus on Oviposition-Related Behaviors.

Authors:  Caroline M Nieberding; Matteo Marcantonio; Raluca Voda; Thomas Enriquez; Bertanne Visser
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 4.096

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.