BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The human CCR5 receptor is a co-receptor for HIV-1 infection and a target for anti-viral therapy. A greater understanding of the binding kinetics of small molecule allosteric ligand interactions with CCR5 will lead to a better understanding of the binding process and may help discover new molecules that avoid resistance. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Using [(3) H] maraviroc as a radioligand, a number of different binding protocols were employed in conjunction with simulations to determine rate constants, kinetic mechanism and mutant kinetic fingerprints for wild-type and mutant human CCR5 with maraviroc, aplaviroc and vicriviroc. KEY RESULTS: Kinetic characterization of maraviroc binding to the wild-type CCR5 was consistent with a two-step kinetic mechanism that involved an initial receptor-ligand complex (RA), which transitioned to a more stable complex, R'A, with at least a 13-fold increase in affinity. The dissociation rate from R'A, k-2 , was 1.2 × 10(-3) min(-1) . The maraviroc time-dependent transition was influenced by F85L, W86A, Y108A, I198A and Y251A mutations of CCR5. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The interaction between maraviroc and CCR5 proceeded according to a multi-step kinetic mechanism, whereby initial mass action binding and later reorganizations of the initial maraviroc-receptor complex lead to a complex with longer residence time. Site-directed mutagenesis identified a kinetic fingerprint of residues that affected the binding kinetics, leading to the conclusion that allosteric ligand binding to CCR5 involved the rearrangement of the binding site in a manner specific to each allosteric ligand.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The humanCCR5 receptor is a co-receptor for HIV-1 infection and a target for anti-viral therapy. A greater understanding of the binding kinetics of small molecule allosteric ligand interactions with CCR5 will lead to a better understanding of the binding process and may help discover new molecules that avoid resistance. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Using [(3) H] maraviroc as a radioligand, a number of different binding protocols were employed in conjunction with simulations to determine rate constants, kinetic mechanism and mutant kinetic fingerprints for wild-type and mutant humanCCR5 with maraviroc, aplaviroc and vicriviroc. KEY RESULTS: Kinetic characterization of maraviroc binding to the wild-type CCR5 was consistent with a two-step kinetic mechanism that involved an initial receptor-ligand complex (RA), which transitioned to a more stable complex, R'A, with at least a 13-fold increase in affinity. The dissociation rate from R'A, k-2 , was 1.2 × 10(-3) min(-1) . The maraviroc time-dependent transition was influenced by F85L, W86A, Y108A, I198A and Y251A mutations of CCR5. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The interaction between maraviroc and CCR5 proceeded according to a multi-step kinetic mechanism, whereby initial mass action binding and later reorganizations of the initial maraviroc-receptor complex lead to a complex with longer residence time. Site-directed mutagenesis identified a kinetic fingerprint of residues that affected the binding kinetics, leading to the conclusion that allosteric ligand binding to CCR5 involved the rearrangement of the binding site in a manner specific to each allosteric ligand.
Authors: Christoph Seibert; Weiwen Ying; Svetlana Gavrilov; Fotini Tsamis; Shawn E Kuhmann; Anandan Palani; Jayaram R Tagat; John W Clader; Stuart W McCombie; Bahige M Baroudy; Steven O Smith; Tatjana Dragic; John P Moore; Thomas P Sakmar Journal: Virology Date: 2006-02-21 Impact factor: 3.616
Authors: Caitlin A D Jagla; Caitlin E Scott; Yaliang Tang; Changjiang Qiao; Gabriel E Mateo-Semidey; Guillermo A Yudowski; Dai Lu; Debra A Kendall Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2018-10-15 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Marta Arimont; Shan-Liang Sun; Rob Leurs; Martine Smit; Iwan J P de Esch; Chris de Graaf Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2017-03-10 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Natalia V Ortiz Zacarías; Kirti K Chahal; Tereza Šimková; Cas van der Horst; Yi Zheng; Asuka Inoue; Emy Theunissen; Lloyd Mallee; Daan van der Es; Julien Louvel; Adriaan P IJzerman; Tracy M Handel; Irina Kufareva; Laura H Heitman Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 7.446