Literature DB >> 24627577

Return to Sports and Subsequent Injury Rates After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Patellar Tendon Autograft.

K Donald Shelbourne1, Rodney W Benner2, Tinker Gray2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The return-to-sport and reinjury rates are not well defined after revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. HYPOTHESIS: School-age athletes would have a higher rate of return to sports and reinjury to either knee after revision ACL surgery compared with college or recreational athletes. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: Patients were prospectively studied after revision ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft. Participants were grouped by competitive sport levels of school age (mean age, 16.6 ± 0.9 years; n = 84), college (19.6 ± 1.2 years; n = 58), or recreational adult (27.6 ± 4.1 years; n = 117). An activity survey was used to determine the specific sport and sport level patients participated in before and after surgery. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) knee survey and Cincinnati Knee Rating System (CKRS) survey responses were also obtained.
RESULTS: The rate of return to the same sport at the same level was 62 of 84 school-age athletes (74%), 43 of 58 college athletes (74%), and 73 of 117 recreational athletes (62%) (P = .1065). The number of patients who had a subsequent ACL graft tear rate after revision surgery was 2 of 84 (2.3%) in the high school group, 3 of 58 (5.1%) in the college group, and 4 of 117 (3.4%) in the recreational group (P = .6706). The number of patients who had a subsequent ACL tear in the contralateral knee was 1 of 84 (1.1%) in the school-age group, 1 of 58 (1.7%) in the college group, and 2 of 117 (1.7%) in the recreational group (P = .9501). At 2 years postoperatively, the mean IKDC subjective total score was 86.1 ± 11.7 points and the mean CKRS total score was 89.7 ± 11.1 points.
CONCLUSION: Revision ACL reconstruction with BPTB autograft and perioperative rehabilitation allowed high school and college athletes to return to sports at the preinjury level at a rate of 74%; the return rate for recreational-level adults was 62%. Reinjury rates in the first 5 years after revision surgery ranged from 2% to 5%, which is lower than what has been reported for young competitive athletes after primary surgery.
© 2014 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior cruciate ligament; graft choice; reconstruction; reinjury; revision; sports

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24627577     DOI: 10.1177/0363546514524921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  20 in total

1.  Relationship Between Sports Participation After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and 2-Year Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  John P Bigouette; Erin C Owen; Brett Brick A Lantz; Rudolf G Hoellrich; Laura J Huston; Amanda K Haas; Christina R Allen; Allen F Anderson; Daniel E Cooper; Thomas M DeBerardino; Warren R Dunn; Barton Mann; Kurt P Spindler; Michael J Stuart; Rick W Wright; John P Albright; Annunziato Ned Amendola; Jack T Andrish; Christopher C Annunziata; Robert A Arciero; Bernard R Bach; Champ L Baker; Arthur R Bartolozzi; Keith M Baumgarten; Jeffery R Bechler; Jeffrey H Berg; Geoffrey A Bernas; Stephen F Brockmeier; Robert H Brophy; Charles A Bush-Joseph; J Brad Butler; John D Campbell; James L Carey; James E Carpenter; Brian J Cole; Jonathan M Cooper; Charles L Cox; R Alexander Creighton; Diane L Dahm; Tal S David; David C Flanigan; Robert W Frederick; Theodore J Ganley; Elizabeth A Garofoli; Charles J Gatt; Steven R Gecha; James Robert Giffin; Sharon L Hame; Jo A Hannafin; Christopher D Harner; Norman Lindsay Harris; Keith S Hechtman; Elliott B Hershman; Timothy M Hosea; David C Johnson; Timothy S Johnson; Morgan H Jones; Christopher C Kaeding; Ganesh V Kamath; Thomas E Klootwyk; Bruce A Levy; C Benjamin Ma; G Peter Maiers; Robert G Marx; Matthew J Matava; Gregory M Mathien; David R McAllister; Eric C McCarty; Robert G McCormack; Bruce S Miller; Carl W Nissen; Daniel F O'Neill; Brett D Owens; Richard D Parker; Mark L Purnell; Arun J Ramappa; Michael A Rauh; Arthur C Rettig; Jon K Sekiya; Kevin G Shea; Orrin H Sherman; James R Slauterbeck; Matthew V Smith; Jeffrey T Spang; Steven J Svoboda; Timothy N Taft; Joachim J Tenuta; Edwin M Tingstad; Armando F Vidal; Darius G Viskontas; Richard A White; James S Williams; Michelle L Wolcott; Brian R Wolf; James J York
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 2.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: clinical outcome and evidence for return to sport.

Authors:  Luca Andriolo; Giuseppe Filardo; Elizaveta Kon; Margherita Ricci; Francesco Della Villa; Stefano Della Villa; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  One-stage revision ACL reconstruction after primary ACL double bundle reconstruction: is bone-patella tendon-bone autograft reliable?

Authors:  Tomohiro Tomihara; Yusuke Hashimoto; Masatoshi Taniuchi; Junsei Takigami; Changhun Han; Nagakazu Shimada
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Strength and functional symmetry is associated with post-operative rehabilitation in patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jay R Ebert; Peter Edwards; Luke Yi; Brendan Joss; Timothy Ackland; Richard Carey-Smith; Jens-Ulrich Buelow; Ben Hewitt
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with ipsi- or contralateral hamstring tendon grafts.

Authors:  Claudio Legnani; Giuseppe Peretti; Enrico Borgo; Stefania Zini; Alberto Ventura
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-01-04

6.  Injury patterns in patients presenting with a recurrent anterior cruciate ligament tear following primary reconstruction.

Authors:  Bryan T H Koh; Andrew A Sayampanathan; Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak; Hwei Chi Chong; Hwee-Chye Andrew Tan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-06

7.  Pre-operative Static Anterior Tibial Translation Assessed on MRI Does Not Influence Return to Sport or Satisfaction After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Niv Marom; Laura J Kleeblad; Daphne Ling; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Robert G Marx; Hollis G Potter; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-10-17

8.  Combined Intra- and Extra-Articular Technique in Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jessica Zanovello; Federica Rosso; Alessandro Bistolfi; Roberto Rossi; Filippo Castoldi
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2017-08-11

9.  Return to Play After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in National Football League Players.

Authors:  Kelechi R Okoroha; Omar Kadri; Robert A Keller; Nathan Marshall; Zlatan Cizmic; Vasilios Moutzouros
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-04-04

10.  One stage revision single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with impacted morselized bone graft following a failed double-bundle reconstruction.

Authors:  Ho Jong Ra; Jeong Ku Ha; Jin Goo Kim; Do-Yon Hwang
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.