Literature DB >> 33380982

Pre-operative Static Anterior Tibial Translation Assessed on MRI Does Not Influence Return to Sport or Satisfaction After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Niv Marom1, Laura J Kleeblad1, Daphne Ling1, Benedict U Nwachukwu1, Robert G Marx1, Hollis G Potter1, Andrew D Pearle1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that the degree of anterior tibial translation (ATT) as measured passively on imaging studies (static ATT) after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury may influence outcomes after ACL reconstruction. However, there is a lack of evidence supporting these suggestions. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this retrospective prognostic study was to assess the predictive value of pre-operative static ATT in knees with ACL injury on return to sport and in satisfaction after ACL reconstruction. Our hypothesis was that greater static ATT would be associated with lower rates of return to sport and lower levels of satisfaction.
METHODS: Patients treated with ACL reconstruction were identified from an institutional registry and assigned to one of three groups according to their ACL injury type: acute ACL injury, chronic ACL injury, and failed ACL reconstruction. ATT in each knee compartment was measured using magnetic resonance imaging, and a retrospective telephone questionnaire was used to investigate post-ACL reconstruction return to sport and subjects' satisfaction.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty patients (52 acute with ACL injury, 29 with chronic ACL injury, and 49 with failed ACL reconstruction) completed the questionnaire, with a mean follow-up of 5.67 years. Ninety-seven patients (74.6%) returned to their primary sport, of whom 63 (65%) returned to the same level of sport. The mean time to return to sport was 10.1 months (range, 2 to 24 months). Overall, 113 patients (87%) were either very satisfied or satisfied with their outcomes. No difference in medial or lateral ATT was found between patients who returned to sport and those who did not. The failed-ACL reconstruction group had significantly lower rates of return to sport than did acutely and chronically injured patients (60.4% versus 88.5% and 75.9%, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The degree of pre-operative ATT in an ACL-deficient knee was not correlated with return to sport or satisfaction after ACL reconstruction. In this study cohort, only failed-ACL reconstruction patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction were significantly less likely to return to their main sport. They were also less likely to return to sport at their pre-operative level, if they did return to sport. © Hospital for Special Surgery 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; magnetic resonance imaging; return to sport; static anterior tibial translation

Year:  2019        PMID: 33380982      PMCID: PMC7749907          DOI: 10.1007/s11420-019-09724-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  23 in total

1.  Return to recreational sports activity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a one- to six-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Juan M Rodríguez-Roiz; Miguel Caballero; Oscar Ares; Sergi Sastre; Luis Lozano; Dragos Popescu
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  Measuring patient satisfaction in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Brent Graham; Andrew Green; Michelle James; Jeffrey Katz; Marc Swiontkowski
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Return-to-sport outcomes at 2 to 7 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.

Authors:  Clare L Ardern; Nicholas F Taylor; Julian A Feller; Kate E Webster
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Notchplasty in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the setting of passive anterior tibial subluxation.

Authors:  Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Saker Khamaisy; Danyal H Nawabi; Ran Thein; Joseph T Nguyen; Joseph D Lipman; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee.

Authors:  H Iwaki; V Pinskerova; M A Freeman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-11

6.  Return to Sport After Primary and Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Comparative Study of 552 Patients From the FAST Cohort.

Authors:  Nicolas Lefevre; Shahnaz Klouche; Guillaume Mirouse; Serge Herman; Antoine Gerometta; Yoann Bohu
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Radiographic evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament graft failure with special reference to tibial tunnel placement.

Authors:  L C Almekinders; J B Chiavetta; J P Clarke
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Reconstruction does not reduce tibial translation in the cruciate-deficient knee an in vivo study.

Authors:  D J Beard; D W Murray; H S Gill; A J Price; J L Rees; J Alfaro-Adrián; C A Dodd
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-11

9.  Ten-Year Outcomes and Risk Factors After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A MOON Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kurt P Spindler; Laura J Huston; Kevin M Chagin; Michael W Kattan; Emily K Reinke; Annunziato Amendola; Jack T Andrish; Robert H Brophy; Charles L Cox; Warren R Dunn; David C Flanigan; Morgan H Jones; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert A Magnussen; Robert G Marx; Matthew J Matava; Eric C McCarty; Richard D Parker; Angela D Pedroza; Armando F Vidal; Michelle L Wolcott; Brian R Wolf; Rick W Wright
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Results of revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery.

Authors:  Michael J Battaglia; Frank A Cordasco; Jo A Hannafin; Scott A Rodeo; Stephen J O'Brien; David W Altchek; John Cavanaugh; Thomas L Wickiewicz; Russell F Warren
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 6.202

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.