Literature DB >> 31225999

Relationship Between Sports Participation After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and 2-Year Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

John P Bigouette1, Erin C Owen1, Brett Brick A Lantz1, Rudolf G Hoellrich1, Laura J Huston1, Amanda K Haas1, Christina R Allen1, Allen F Anderson1, Daniel E Cooper1, Thomas M DeBerardino1, Warren R Dunn1, Barton Mann1, Kurt P Spindler1, Michael J Stuart1, Rick W Wright1, John P Albright1, Annunziato Ned Amendola1, Jack T Andrish1, Christopher C Annunziata1, Robert A Arciero1, Bernard R Bach1, Champ L Baker1, Arthur R Bartolozzi1, Keith M Baumgarten1, Jeffery R Bechler1, Jeffrey H Berg1, Geoffrey A Bernas1, Stephen F Brockmeier1, Robert H Brophy1, Charles A Bush-Joseph1, J Brad Butler1, John D Campbell1, James L Carey1, James E Carpenter1, Brian J Cole1, Jonathan M Cooper1, Charles L Cox1, R Alexander Creighton1, Diane L Dahm1, Tal S David1, David C Flanigan1, Robert W Frederick1, Theodore J Ganley1, Elizabeth A Garofoli1, Charles J Gatt1, Steven R Gecha1, James Robert Giffin1, Sharon L Hame1, Jo A Hannafin1, Christopher D Harner1, Norman Lindsay Harris1, Keith S Hechtman1, Elliott B Hershman1, Timothy M Hosea1, David C Johnson1, Timothy S Johnson1, Morgan H Jones1, Christopher C Kaeding1, Ganesh V Kamath1, Thomas E Klootwyk1, Bruce A Levy1, C Benjamin Ma1, G Peter Maiers1, Robert G Marx1, Matthew J Matava1, Gregory M Mathien1, David R McAllister1, Eric C McCarty1, Robert G McCormack1, Bruce S Miller1, Carl W Nissen1, Daniel F O'Neill1, Brett D Owens1, Richard D Parker1, Mark L Purnell1, Arun J Ramappa1, Michael A Rauh1, Arthur C Rettig1, Jon K Sekiya1, Kevin G Shea1, Orrin H Sherman1, James R Slauterbeck1, Matthew V Smith1, Jeffrey T Spang1, Steven J Svoboda1, Timothy N Taft1, Joachim J Tenuta1, Edwin M Tingstad1, Armando F Vidal1, Darius G Viskontas1, Richard A White1, James S Williams1, Michelle L Wolcott1, Brian R Wolf1, James J York1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision cohorts continually report lower outcome scores on validated knee questionnaires than primary ACL cohorts at similar time points after surgery. It is unclear how these outcomes are associated with physical activity after physician clearance for return to recreational or competitive sports after ACL revision surgery. HYPOTHESES: Participants who return to either multiple sports or a singular sport after revision ACL surgery will report decreased knee symptoms, increased activity level, and improved knee function as measured by validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and compared with no sports participation. Multisport participation as compared with singular sport participation will result in similar increased PROMs and activity level. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: A total of 1205 patients who underwent revision ACL reconstruction were enrolled by 83 surgeons at 52 clinical sites. At the time of revision, baseline data collected included the following: demographics, surgical characteristics, previous knee treatment and PROMs, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire, Marx activity score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). A series of multivariate regression models were used to evaluate the association of IKDC, KOOS, WOMAC, and Marx Activity Rating Scale scores at 2 years after revision surgery by sports participation category, controlling for known significant covariates.
RESULTS: Two-year follow-up was obtained on 82% (986 of 1205) of the original cohort. Patients who reported not participating in sports after revision surgery had lower median PROMs both at baseline and at 2 years as compared with patients who participated in either a single sport or multiple sports. Significant differences were found in the change of scores among groups on the IKDC (P < .0001), KOOS-Symptoms (P = .01), KOOS-Sports and Recreation (P = .04), and KOOS-Quality of Life (P < .0001). Patients with no sports participation were 2.0 to 5.7 times more likely than multiple-sport participants to report significantly lower PROMs, depending on the specific outcome measure assessed, and 1.8 to 3.8 times more likely than single-sport participants (except for WOMAC-Stiffness, P = .18), after controlling for known covariates.
CONCLUSION: Participation in either a single sport or multiple sports in the 2 years after ACL revision surgery was found to be significantly associated with higher PROMs across multiple validated self-reported assessment tools. During follow-up appointments, surgeons should continue to expect that patients who report returning to physical activity after surgery will self-report better functional outcomes, regardless of baseline activity levels.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterior cruciate ligament; outcomes; revision ACL; sports participation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31225999      PMCID: PMC6939628          DOI: 10.1177/0363546519856348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  26 in total

Review 1.  Knee sports injury outcome measures.

Authors:  Rick W Wright
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.757

2.  Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form.

Authors:  James J Irrgang; Allen F Anderson; Arthur L Boland; Christopher D Harner; Philippe Neyret; John C Richmond; K Donald Shelbourne
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Sports participation 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in athletes who had not returned to sport at 1 year: a prospective follow-up of physical function and psychological factors in 122 athletes.

Authors:  Clare L Ardern; Nicholas F Taylor; Julian A Feller; Timothy S Whitehead; Kate E Webster
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Return-to-sport outcomes at 2 to 7 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.

Authors:  Clare L Ardern; Nicholas F Taylor; Julian A Feller; Kate E Webster
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Intra-articular findings in primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a comparison of the MOON and MARS study groups.

Authors:  James R Borchers; Christopher C Kaeding; Angela D Pedroza; Laura J Huston; Kurt P Spindler; Rick W Wright
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Return to Sport After Primary and Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Comparative Study of 552 Patients From the FAST Cohort.

Authors:  Nicolas Lefevre; Shahnaz Klouche; Guillaume Mirouse; Serge Herman; Antoine Gerometta; Yoann Bohu
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Ten-Year Outcomes and Risk Factors After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A MOON Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kurt P Spindler; Laura J Huston; Kevin M Chagin; Michael W Kattan; Emily K Reinke; Annunziato Amendola; Jack T Andrish; Robert H Brophy; Charles L Cox; Warren R Dunn; David C Flanigan; Morgan H Jones; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert A Magnussen; Robert G Marx; Matthew J Matava; Eric C McCarty; Richard D Parker; Angela D Pedroza; Armando F Vidal; Michelle L Wolcott; Brian R Wolf; Rick W Wright
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Return-to-Sport Outcomes After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery.

Authors:  Bobby S Anand; Julian A Feller; Anneka K Richmond; Kate E Webster
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Factors Influencing Graft Choice in Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the MARS Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 10.  The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Ewa M Roos; L Stefan Lohmander
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-11-03       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Revision ACL Reconstruction: Principles and Practice.

Authors:  Sachin Tapasvi; Anshu Shekhar
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 1.251

2.  [Mid-term effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament revision].

Authors:  Xing Yun; Yu Wei; Zhongli Li; Yujie Liu; Zhigang Wang; Qiang Zhang; Yang Liu; Min Wei
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-01-15

3.  Quadriceps tendon autograft is becoming increasingly popular in revision ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Philipp W Winkler; Thiago Vivacqua; Stephan Thomassen; Lisa Lovse; Bryson P Lesniak; Alan M J Getgood; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.342

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.