Literature DB >> 24627271

Promoting quality and evidence-based care in early-stage breast cancer follow-up.

N Lynn Henry, Lynn N Henry1, Daniel F Hayes, Scott D Ramsey, Gabriel N Hortobagyi, William E Barlow, Julie R Gralow.   

Abstract

Evidence-based guidelines for long-term follow-up of early-stage breast cancer patients developed by oncology societies in the United States and Europe recommend that breast cancer survivors undergo regular evaluation with history and physical examination, as well as annual mammography. Routine blood tests, circulating tumor markers, and/or surveillance imaging studies beyond mammography are not recommended in the absence of concerning symptoms or physical examination findings because of lack of supportive clinical evidence. Despite these guidelines, studies have shown that 20% to 40% of oncologists assess serum tumor markers as part of routine monitoring of early-stage breast cancer patients. As part of efforts to both address the financial challenges confronting the health-care system and optimize patient outcomes, the American Society of Clinical Oncology's Cost of Care Task Force identified adherence to breast cancer surveillance guidelines as an opportunity to improve care and reduce cost. However, these recommendations are based on trials done in an era of outdated technology and limited therapeutic options. It is possible that recent improvements in diagnostics and treatments could make earlier detection of recurrent disease important for improving both survival and quality of life outcomes. Research is necessary to further inform optimal breast cancer follow-up strategies, which could impact these recommendations. At this time, outside of well-conducted clinical trials, there is no role for ordering routine serial blood or imaging tests in monitoring for recurrence in early-stage breast cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24627271      PMCID: PMC4311189          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  46 in total

1.  Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: follow-up after treatment for breast cancer (summary of the 2005 update).

Authors:  Eva Grunfeld; Sukhbinder Dhesy-Thind; Mark Levine
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Use of Truquant BR radioimmunoassay for early detection of breast cancer recurrence in patients with stage II and stage III disease.

Authors:  D W Chan; R A Beveridge; H Muss; H A Fritsche; G Hortobagyi; R Theriault; D Kiang; B J Kennedy; M Evelegh
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Follow-up cost of breast cancer patients with localized disease after primary treatment: a randomized trial.

Authors:  R Kokko; M Hakama; K Holli
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Treatment of disease-negative but mucin-like carcinoma-associated antigen-positive breast cancer patients with tamoxifen: preliminary results of a prospective controlled randomized trial.

Authors:  F Kovner; O Merimsky; M Hareuveni; N Wigler; S Chaitchik
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Circulating CA 15-3 levels in the postsurgical follow-up of breast cancer patients and in non-malignant diseases.

Authors:  R Colomer; A Ruibal; J Genollá; D Rubio; J M Del Campo; R Bodi; L Salvador
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Environmental causes of breast cancer and radiation from medical imaging: findings from the Institute of Medicine report.

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-09

Review 8.  Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer.

Authors:  M P Rojas; E Telaro; A Russo; I Moschetti; L Coe; R Fossati; D Palli; Turco M del Roselli; A Liberati
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-01-25

9.  Circulating tumour cells in non-metastatic breast cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  Anthony Lucci; Carolyn S Hall; Ashutosh K Lodhi; Anirban Bhattacharyya; Amber E Anderson; Lianchun Xiao; Isabelle Bedrosian; Henry M Kuerer; Savitri Krishnamurthy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Serial determination of CEA and CA 15.3 in breast cancer follow-up: an assessment of their diagnostic accuracy for the detection of tumour recurrences.

Authors:  Luigi Mariani; Rosalba Miceli; Silvia Michilin; Massimo Gion
Journal:  Biomarkers       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.658

View more
  15 in total

1.  Assessment of Molecular Relapse Detection in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Isaac Garcia-Murillas; Neha Chopra; Iñaki Comino-Méndez; Matthew Beaney; Holly Tovey; Rosalind J Cutts; Claire Swift; Divya Kriplani; Maria Afentakis; Sarah Hrebien; Giselle Walsh-Crestani; Peter Barry; Stephen R D Johnston; Alistair Ring; Judith Bliss; Simon Russell; Abigail Evans; Anthony Skene; Duncan Wheatley; Mitch Dowsett; Ian E Smith; Nicholas C Turner
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 31.777

2.  Relationship Between Quality of Comorbid Condition Care and Costs for Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Kevin D Frick; Claire F Snyder; Robert J Herbert; Amanda L Blackford; Bridget A Neville; Antonio C Wolff; Michael A Carducci; Craig C Earle
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Surveillance After Treatment of Localized Breast Cancer: Time for Reappraisal?

Authors:  Joseph A Sparano; N Lynn Henry
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Imaging Surveillance After Definitive Treatment for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Natalia S Partain; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Imaging Surveillance After Primary Breast Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Diana L Lam; Nehmat Houssami; Janie M Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Evidence for Detection Bias by Medication Use in a Cohort Study of Breast Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Heidi S Wirtz; Gregory S Calip; Diana S M Buist; Julie R Gralow; William E Barlow; Shelly Gray; Denise M Boudreau
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-04-15       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Follow-up Reality for Breast Cancer Patients - Standardised Survey of Patients and Physicians and Analysis of Treatment Data.

Authors:  S Feiten; J Dünnebacke; V Friesenhahn; J Heymanns; H Köppler; R Meister; J Thomalla; C van Roye; D Wey; R Weide
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.915

8.  Real-World Breast Cancer Patient Follow-Up Practices by Medical Oncologists in India-A Survey Report.

Authors:  Amol Patel; Vineet Govinda Gupta; Bhupesh Guleria; Chandan K Das; Prashant Mehta; Kaushik Mahadevapura Ramegowda
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2022-02-05

9.  Factors associated with imaging in patients with early breast cancer after initial treatment.

Authors:  K Enright; T Desai; R Sutradhar; A Gonzalez; M Powis; N Taback; C M Booth; M E Trudeau; M K Krzyzanowska
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Testing chemotherapy efficacy in HER2 negative breast cancer using patient-derived spheroids.

Authors:  Kathrin Halfter; Oliver Hoffmann; Nina Ditsch; Mareike Ahne; Frank Arnold; Stefan Paepke; Dieter Grab; Ingo Bauerfeind; Barbara Mayer
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.