Literature DB >> 22688684

Environmental causes of breast cancer and radiation from medical imaging: findings from the Institute of Medicine report.

Rebecca Smith-Bindman1.   

Abstract

Susan G. Komen for the Cure asked the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to perform a comprehensive review of environmental causes and risk factors for breast cancer. Interestingly, none of the consumer products (ie, bisphenol A, phthalates), industrial chemicals (ie, benzene, ethylene oxide), or pesticides (ie, DDT/DDE) considered could be conclusively linked to an increased risk of breast cancer, although the IOM acknowledged that the available evidence was insufficient to draw firm conclusions for many of these exposures, calling for more research in these areas. The IOM found sufficient evidence to conclude that the 2 environmental factors most strongly associated with breast cancer were exposure to ionizing radiation and to combined postmenopausal hormone therapy. The IOM's conclusion of a causal relation between radiation exposure and cancer is consistent with a large and varied literature showing that exposure to radiation in the same range as used for computed tomography will increase the risk of cancer. It is the responsibility of individual health care providers who order medical imaging to understand and weigh the risk of any medical procedures against the expected benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22688684      PMCID: PMC3936791          DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.2329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  24 in total

1.  UNSCEAR report 2000: sources and effects of ionizing radiation. United Nations Scientific Comittee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation.

Authors:  M Charles
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.394

2.  Do physicians need a "shopping cart" for health care services?

Authors:  Robert H Brook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  The new era of medical imaging--progress and pitfalls.

Authors:  John K Iglehart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Revised radiation doses for typical X-ray examinations. Report on a recent review of doses to patients from medical X-ray examinations in the UK by NRPB. National Radiological Protection Board.

Authors:  B F Wall; D Hart
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment.

Authors:  David M Studdert; Michelle M Mello; William M Sage; Catherine M DesRoches; Jordon Peugh; Kinga Zapert; Troyen A Brennan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998.

Authors:  D L Preston; E Ron; S Tokuoka; S Funamoto; N Nishi; M Soda; K Mabuchi; K Kodama
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results From the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jacques E Rossouw; Garnet L Anderson; Ross L Prentice; Andrea Z LaCroix; Charles Kooperberg; Marcia L Stefanick; Rebecca D Jackson; Shirley A A Beresford; Barbara V Howard; Karen C Johnson; Jane Morley Kotchen; Judith Ockene
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-07-17       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Informing parents about CT radiation exposure in children: it's OK to tell them.

Authors:  David B Larson; Scott B Rader; Howard P Forman; Laura Z Fenton
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  The decrease in breast-cancer incidence in 2003 in the United States.

Authors:  Peter M Ravdin; Kathleen A Cronin; Nadia Howlader; Christine D Berg; Rowan T Chlebowski; Eric J Feuer; Brenda K Edwards; Donald A Berry
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks.

Authors:  Christoph I Lee; Andrew H Haims; Edward P Monico; James A Brink; Howard P Forman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  16 in total

1.  Gender Differences in Radiation Dose From Nuclear Cardiology Studies Across the World: Findings From the INCAPS Registry.

Authors:  Lynn Shi; Sharmila Dorbala; Diana Paez; Leslee J Shaw; Katherine A Zukotynski; Thomas N B Pascual; Ganesan Karthikeyan; João V Vitola; Nathan Better; Nadia Bokhari; Madan M Rehani; Ravi Kashyap; Maurizio Dondi; Mathew Mercuri; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-04

2.  Effects of Breast Shielding during Heart Imaging on DNA Double-Strand-Break Levels: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Michael K Cheezum; Christophe E Redon; Allison S Burrell; Anthony S Kaviratne; Jody Bindeman; Daisuke Maeda; Houria Balmakhtar; Ashly Pezel; Piotr Wisniewski; Panfilo Delacruz; Binh Nguyen; William M Bonner; Todd C Villines
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Diagnostic chest X-rays and breast cancer risk before age 50 years for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Esther M John; Valerie McGuire; Duncan Thomas; Robert Haile; Hilmi Ozcelik; Roger L Milne; Anna Felberg; Dee W West; Alexander Miron; Julia A Knight; Mary Beth Terry; Mary Daly; Saundra S Buys; Irene L Andrulis; John L Hopper; Melissa C Southey; Graham G Giles; Carmel Apicella; Heather Thorne; Alice S Whittemore
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Bisphenol-A/Radiation mediated inflammatory response activates EGFR/KRAS/ERK1/2 signaling pathway leads to lung carcinogenesis incidence.

Authors:  Omayma Ar Abo-Zaid; Fatma Sm Moawed; Hend A Hassan; Enas M Moustafa
Journal:  Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.219

Review 5.  Deregulation of the EGFR/PI3K/PTEN/Akt/mTORC1 pathway in breast cancer: possibilities for therapeutic intervention.

Authors:  Nicole M Davis; Melissa Sokolosky; Kristin Stadelman; Steve L Abrams; Massimo Libra; Saverio Candido; Ferdinando Nicoletti; Jerry Polesel; Roberta Maestro; Antonino D'Assoro; Lyudmyla Drobot; Dariusz Rakus; Agnieszka Gizak; Piotr Laidler; Joanna Dulińska-Litewka; Joerg Basecke; Sanja Mijatovic; Danijela Maksimovic-Ivanic; Giuseppe Montalto; Melchiorre Cervello; Timothy L Fitzgerald; Zoya Demidenko; Alberto M Martelli; Lucio Cocco; Linda S Steelman; James A McCubrey
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-07-15

Review 6.  Promoting quality and evidence-based care in early-stage breast cancer follow-up.

Authors:  N Lynn Henry; Lynn N Henry; Daniel F Hayes; Scott D Ramsey; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; William E Barlow; Julie R Gralow
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Do statins increase and Mediterranean diet decrease the risk of breast cancer?

Authors:  Michel de Lorgeril; Patricia Salen
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 8.  Status and potential clinical value of a transthoracic evaluation of the coronary arteries.

Authors:  Fabien Labombarda; Samuela Castelnuovo; Dionysis Goularas; Cesare R Sirtori
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.062

9.  High content screening application for cell-type specific behaviour in heterogeneous primary breast epithelial subpopulations.

Authors:  Rebecca L Johnston; Leesa Wockner; Amy E McCart Reed; Adrian Wiegmans; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Kum Kum Khanna; Sunil R Lakhani; Chanel E Smart
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Multiple susceptibility loci for radiation-induced mammary tumorigenesis in F2[Dahl S x R]-intercross rats.

Authors:  Victoria L Herrera; Lorenz R Ponce; Nelson Ruiz-Opazo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.