Literature DB >> 28338879

Evidence for Detection Bias by Medication Use in a Cohort Study of Breast Cancer Survivors.

Heidi S Wirtz, Gregory S Calip, Diana S M Buist, Julie R Gralow, William E Barlow, Shelly Gray, Denise M Boudreau.   

Abstract

In previous studies, we found modestly decreased and increased risks of second breast cancer events with the use of statins and antibiotics, respectively, after adjustment for surveillance mammography. We evaluated detection bias by comparing receipt of surveillance mammography among users of these 2 disparate classes of medication. Adult women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer during 1990-2008 (n = 3,965) while enrolled in an integrated health-care plan (Group Health Cooperative; Washington State) were followed for up to 10 years in the Commonly Used Medications and Breast Cancer Outcomes (COMBO) Study. Categories of antibiotic use included infrequent (1-3 dispensings/12 months) and frequent (≥4 dispensings/12 months) use, and categories of statin use included less adherent (1 dispensing/6 months) and adherent (≥2 dispensings/6 months). We examined associations between medication use and surveillance mammography using multivariable generalized estimating equations and evaluated the impact of adjusting for surveillance within Cox proportional hazard models. Frequent antibiotic users were less likely to receive surveillance mammography (odds ratio (OR) = 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82, 0.99) than were nonusers; no association was found among infrequent users (OR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.90, 1.03). Adherent statin use was associated with more surveillance compared with nonuse (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.25), but less adherent statin use was not (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.81, 1.31). No difference in associations between medications of interest and second breast cancer events was observed when surveillance was removed from otherwise adjusted models. The influence of detection bias by medication use warrants further exploration.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; cancer survivorship; detection bias; epidemiologic methods

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28338879      PMCID: PMC5394250          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kww242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  50 in total

1.  Bias and causal associations in observational research.

Authors:  David A Grimes; Kenneth F Schulz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-01-19       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Threats to validity of nonrandomized studies of postdiagnosis exposures on cancer recurrence and survival.

Authors:  Jessica Chubak; Denise M Boudreau; Heidi S Wirtz; Barbara McKnight; Noel S Weiss
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Statin prescriptions and breast cancer recurrence risk: a Danish nationwide prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Thomas P Ahern; Lars Pedersen; Maja Tarp; Deirdre P Cronin-Fenton; Jens Peter Garne; Rebecca A Silliman; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Timothy L Lash
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Statins and the risk of lung, breast, and colorectal cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  Soko Setoguchi; Robert J Glynn; Jerry Avorn; Helen Mogun; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Re: The association between statins and cancer incidence in a veterans population.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Platz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Accuracy and outcomes of screening mammography in women with a personal history of early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Linn A Abraham; Diana L Miglioretti; Edward A Sickles; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana S M Buist; Berta M Geller; Hyman B Muss; Les Irwig
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes.

Authors:  S L Zeger; K Y Liang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Selective prescribing led to overestimation of the benefits of lipid-lowering drugs.

Authors:  Robert J Glynn; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Philip S Wang; Raia Levin; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Revisions in the risk-based Breast Cancer Screening Program at Group Health Cooperative.

Authors:  S H Taplin; R S Thompson; F Schnitzer; C Anderman; V Immanuel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Comparative safety of cardiovascular medication use and breast cancer outcomes among women with early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Denise M Boudreau; Onchee Yu; Jessica Chubak; Heidi S Wirtz; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Monica Fujii; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  2 in total

1.  Associations between frailty and cancer-specific mortality among older women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Connie H Yan; Chandler Coleman; Nadia A Nabulsi; Brian C-H Chiu; Naomi Y Ko; Kent Hoskins; Gregory S Calip
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 4.624

2.  The importance and implications of comparator selection in pharmacoepidemiologic research.

Authors:  Monica D'Arcy; Til Stürmer; Jennifer L Lund
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2018-07-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.