Literature DB >> 24627168

Encoding and choice in the task span paradigm.

Kaitlin M Reiman1, Starla M Weaver, Catherine M Arrington.   

Abstract

Cognitive control during sequences of planned behaviors requires both plan-level processes such as generating, maintaining, and monitoring the plan, as well as task-level processes such as selecting, establishing and implementing specific task sets. The task span paradigm (Logan in J Exp Psychol Gen 133:218-236, 2004) combines two common cognitive control paradigms, task switching and working memory span, to investigate the integration of plan-level and task-level processes during control of sequential behavior. The current study expands past task span research to include measures of encoding processes and choice behavior with volitional sequence generation, using the standard task span as well as a novel voluntary task span paradigm. In two experiments, we consider how sequence complexity, defined separately for plan-level and task-level complexity, influences sequence encoding (Experiment 1), sequence choice (Experiment 2), sequence memory, and task performance of planned sequences of action. Results indicate that participants were sensitive to sequence complexity, but that different aspects of behavior are most strongly influenced by different types of complexity. Hierarchical complexity at the plan level best predicts voluntary sequence generation and memory; while switch frequency at the task level best predicts encoding of externally defined sequences and task performance. Furthermore, performance RTs were similar for externally and internally defined plans, whereas memory was improved for internally defined sequences. Finally, participants demonstrated a significant sequence choice bias in the voluntary task span. Consistent with past research on choice behavior, volitional selection of plans was markedly influenced by both the ease of memory and performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24627168     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-014-0556-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  29 in total

1.  Working memory and the control of action: evidence from task switching.

Authors:  A Baddeley; D Chincotta; A Adlam
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-12

2.  Voluntary task switching under load: contribution of top-down and bottom-up factors in goal-directed behavior.

Authors:  Jelle Demanet; Frederick Verbruggen; Baptist Liefooghe; André Vandierendonck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-06

3.  The surface structure and the deep structure of sequential control: what can we learn from task span switch costs?

Authors:  Ulrich Mayr
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

4.  Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching.

Authors:  Iring Koch; Alan Allport
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

5.  On how to be unpredictable: evidence from the voluntary task-switching paradigm.

Authors:  Ulrich Mayr; Theodor Bell
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-09

6.  Task switching based on externally presented versus internally generated information.

Authors:  Thomas Kleinsorge; Patrick D Gajewski
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-02-27

7.  Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: are there "true" task switch effects?

Authors:  Catherine M Arrington; Gordon D Logan; Darryl W Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Working memory encoding delays top-down attention to visual cortex.

Authors:  Paige E Scalf; Paul E Dux; René Marois
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Analogous mechanisms of selection and updating in declarative and procedural working memory: experiments and a computational model.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Alessandra S Souza; Michel D Druey; Miriam Gade
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand.

Authors:  Wouter Kool; Joseph T McGuire; Zev B Rosen; Matthew M Botvinick
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2010-11
View more
  2 in total

1.  Item-specific priming of voluntary task switches.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Chiu; Kerstin Fröber; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Intraindividual variability across cognitive tasks as a potential marker for prodromal Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Andrea M Kälin; Marlon Pflüger; Anton F Gietl; Florian Riese; Lutz Jäncke; Roger M Nitsch; Christoph Hock
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 5.750

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.