Literature DB >> 21281093

Working memory encoding delays top-down attention to visual cortex.

Paige E Scalf1, Paul E Dux, René Marois.   

Abstract

The encoding of information from one event into working memory can delay high-level, central decision-making processes for subsequent events [e.g., Jolicoeur, P., & Dell'Acqua, R. The demonstration of short-term consolidation. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 138-202, 1998, doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0684]. Working memory, however, is also believed to interfere with the deployment of top-down attention [de Fockert, J. W., Rees, G., Frith, C. D., & Lavie, N. The role of working memory in visual selective attention. Science, 291, 1803-1806, 2001, doi:10.1126/science.1056496]. It is, therefore, possible that, in addition to delaying central processes, the engagement of working memory encoding (WME) also postpones perceptual processing as well. Here, we tested this hypothesis with time-resolved fMRI by assessing whether WME serially postpones the action of top-down attention on low-level sensory signals. In three experiments, participants viewed a skeletal rapid serial visual presentation sequence that contained two target items (T1 and T2) separated by either a short (550 msec) or long (1450 msec) SOA. During single-target runs, participants attended and responded only to T1, whereas in dual-target runs, participants attended and responded to both targets. To determine whether T1 processing delayed top-down attentional enhancement of T2, we examined T2 BOLD response in visual cortex by subtracting the single-task waveforms from the dual-task waveforms for each SOA. When the WME demands of T1 were high (Experiments 1 and 3), T2 BOLD response was delayed at the short SOA relative to the long SOA. This was not the case when T1 encoding demands were low (Experiment 2). We conclude that encoding of a stimulus into working memory delays the deployment of attention to subsequent target representations in visual cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21281093     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2011.21621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  9 in total

1.  Encoding and choice in the task span paradigm.

Authors:  Kaitlin M Reiman; Starla M Weaver; Catherine M Arrington
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-14

2.  A Unified attentional bottleneck in the human brain.

Authors:  Michael N Tombu; Christopher L Asplund; Paul E Dux; Douglass Godwin; Justin W Martin; René Marois
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Central attention is serial, but midlevel and peripheral attention are parallel-A hypothesis.

Authors:  Benjamin J Tamber-Rosenau; René Marois
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Voxel-level functional connectivity using spatial regularization.

Authors:  Christopher Baldassano; Marius Cătălin Iordan; Diane M Beck; Li Fei-Fei
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Better target detection in the presence of collinear flankers under high working memory load.

Authors:  Jan W De Fockert; Jaclyn Leiser
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Interference Control Modulations Over Conscious Perception.

Authors:  Itsaso Colás; Mónica Triviño; Ana B Chica
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-10

7.  Beyond perceptual load and dilution: a review of the role of working memory in selective attention.

Authors:  Jan W de Fockert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-21

8.  Competition explains limited attention and perceptual resources: implications for perceptual load and dilution theories.

Authors:  Paige E Scalf; Ana Torralbo; Evelina Tapia; Diane M Beck
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-10

9.  Age-Related Changes in Perirhinal Cortex Sensitivity to Configuration and Part Familiarity and Connectivity to Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Laura Cacciamani; Erica Wager; Mary A Peterson; Paige E Scalf
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 5.750

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.