Literature DB >> 24625725

Blind dates in sciences: dealing with rejection in peer review.

Yibin Wang1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  peer review; rejection (psychology)

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 24625725      PMCID： PMC4046331          DOI： 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.302765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Res        ISSN： 0009-7330            Impact factor:   17.367


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  Seven reasons not to be a peer reviewer--and why these reasons are wrong.

Authors:  Thomas M Annesley
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Becoming a peer reviewer to medical education journals.

Authors:  Samy A Azer; Subha Ramani; Ray Peterson
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 3.650

3.  Biomedical information, peer review, and conflict of interest as they influence public health.

Authors:  E I Cantekin; T W McGuire; R L Potter
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The importance of peer review.

Authors:  Robin Dawn Froman
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.228

5.  The reviewer is always right: peer review of research in Medical Education.

Authors:  Kevin W Eva
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.251

6.  Testing the rebound peer review concept.

Authors:  Stefan W Ryter; Augustine M K Choi
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 8.401

7.  Meaningful peer review is integral to quality science and should provide benefits to the authors and reviewers alike.

Authors:  Douglas T Carrell; Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.842

8.  Civil, sensible, and constructive peer review in APS journals.

Authors:  Hershel Raff; Dennis Brown
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.288

9.  The evolution of editorial peer review.

Authors:  J C Burnham
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Views on the peer review system of biomedical journals: an online survey of academics from high-ranking universities.

Authors:  Roger Chun-Man Ho; Kwok-Kei Mak; Ren Tao; Yanxia Lu; Jeffrey R Day; Fang Pan
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 4.615
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.