Literature DB >> 22322980

Seven reasons not to be a peer reviewer--and why these reasons are wrong.

Thomas M Annesley1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2012        PMID： 22322980     DOI： 10.1373/clinchem.2012.182618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN： 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Blind dates in sciences: dealing with rejection in peer review.

Authors:  Yibin Wang
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 17.367

2.  'Scholarly peer reviewing': The art, its joys and woes.

Authors:  Madhuri S Kurdi
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2015-08

3.  Early Impact of the Western Journal of Emergency Medicine CDEM/CORD Special Issue in Educational Research & Practice.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Love; Sally A Santen; David P Way; Brendan W Munzer; Chris Merritt; Douglas S Ander; John W Cyrus
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-12-09

Review 4.  Manuscript review continuing medical education: a retrospective investigation of the learning outcomes from this peer reviewer benefit.

Authors:  Steven Kawczak; Sultana Mustafa
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.692
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.