Literature DB >> 23785017

Meaningful peer review is integral to quality science and should provide benefits to the authors and reviewers alike.

Douglas T Carrell, Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 23785017     DOI： 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2013.00105.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Andrology        ISSN： 2047-2919            Impact factor:   3.842


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Expediting peer review: why say yes.

Authors:  Stuart F Quan
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 4.062

2.  Blind dates in sciences: dealing with rejection in peer review.

Authors:  Yibin Wang
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 3.  Rewarding peer reviewers: maintaining the integrity of science communication.

Authors:  Armen Yuri Gasparyan; Alexey N Gerasimov; Alexander A Voronov; George D Kitas
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 4.  Manuscript review continuing medical education: a retrospective investigation of the learning outcomes from this peer reviewer benefit.

Authors:  Steven Kawczak; Sultana Mustafa
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.692
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.