Literature DB >> 24625517

The contribution from transit dose for (192)Ir HDR brachytherapy treatments.

G P Fonseca1, G Landry, B Reniers, A Hoffmann, R A Rubo, P C G Antunes, H Yoriyaz, F Verhaegen.   

Abstract

Brachytherapy treatment planning systems that use model-based dose calculation algorithms employ a more accurate approach that replaces the TG43-U1 water dose formalism and adopt the TG-186 recommendations regarding composition and geometry of patients and other relevant effects. However, no recommendations were provided on the transit dose due to the source traveling inside the patient. This study describes a methodology to calculate the transit dose using information from the treatment planning system (TPS) and considering the source's instantaneous and average speed for two prostate and two gynecological cases. The trajectory of the (192)Ir HDR source was defined by importing applicator contour points and dwell positions from the TPS. The transit dose distribution was calculated using the maximum speed, the average speed and uniform accelerations obtained from the literature to obtain an approximate continuous source distribution simulated with a Monte Carlo code. The transit component can be negligible or significant depending on the speed profile adopted, which is not clearly reported in the literature. The significance of the transit dose can also be due to the treatment modality; in our study interstitial treatments exhibited the largest effects. Considering the worst case scenario the transit dose can reach 3% of the prescribed dose in a gynecological case with four catheters and up to 11.1% when comparing the average prostate dose for a case with 16 catheters. The transit dose component increases by increasing the number of catheters used for HDR brachytherapy, reducing the total dwell time per catheter or increasing the number of dwell positions with low dwell times. This contribution may become significant (>5%) if it is not corrected appropriately. The transit dose cannot be completely compensated using simple dwell time corrections since it may have a non-uniform distribution. An accurate measurement of the source acceleration and maximum speed should be incorporated in clinical practice or provided by the manufacturer to determine the transit dose component with high accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24625517     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/7/1831

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  3 in total

1.  Impact of source position on high-dose-rate skin surface applicator dosimetry.

Authors:  Jeho Jeong; Christopher A Barker; Marco Zaider; Gil'ad N Cohen
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 2.  In vivo dosimetry in brachytherapy: Requirements and future directions for research, development, and clinical practice.

Authors:  Gabriel P Fonseca; Jacob G Johansen; Ryan L Smith; Luc Beaulieu; Sam Beddar; Gustavo Kertzscher; Frank Verhaegen; Kari Tanderup
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-09-28

3.  In Vivo Verification of Treatment Source Dwell Times in Brachytherapy of Postoperative Endometrial Carcinoma: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Antonio Herreros; José Pérez-Calatayud; Facundo Ballester; Jose Barrera-Gómez; Rosa Abellana; Joana Melo; Luis Moutinho; Luca Tagliaferri; Ángeles Rovirosa
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-05-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.