Literature DB >> 24625244

Burden of venous leg ulcers in the United States.

J Bradford Rice1, Urvi Desai, Alice Kate G Cummings, Howard G Birnbaum, Michelle Skornicki, Nathan Parsons.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the annual incremental per-patient and overall payer burden (2012USD) of venous leg ulcers (VLU) in the US.
METHODS: Beneficiaries with and without VLU were identified using two de-identified insurance claims databases: aged 65+ from a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries (2007-2010: n ∼ 2.3 million); and aged 18-64 from a privately-insured population (2007-2011: n ∼ 8.4 million). The index date was selected as the date of a VLU claim with no other VLU diagnoses in the preceding 12 months for the VLU cohort and as the date of a random medical claim for the non-VLU patients. These groups were matched using propensity scores to account for differences in demographics, comorbidities, resource utilization, and costs in the 12 month pre-index period. Medical resource use and costs incurred during the 12 month follow-up period were calculated for both payers. Drug costs and indirect work-loss due to disability and medically-related absenteeism were estimated for the privately-insured sample only. Annual VLU incidence rates were also estimated for both payers.
RESULTS: Data for 58,672 matched VLU/non-VLU pairs of Medicare and 22,476 matched pairs of privately-insured patients were analyzed. Relative to matched non-VLU patients, VLU patients used more medical resources and incurred annual incremental medical costs of $6391 in Medicare ($18,986 vs $12,595), and $7030 ($13,653 vs $6623) in private insurance ($7086 including drug costs). Compared with non-VLU patients, privately-insured VLU patients had more days missed from work (14.0 vs 10.0), resulting in 29% higher work-loss costs (comparisons significant at p < 0.0001). The average annual incidence rate of VLU was 2.2% in Medicare and 0.5% in private insurance. LIMITATIONS: Findings did not account for out-of-pocket payments or other indirect costs (e.g., lost productivity), and relied on accuracy of diagnosis and procedure codes contained in claims data.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest an annual US payer burden of $14.9 billion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24625244     DOI: 10.3111/13696998.2014.903258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Econ        ISSN: 1369-6998            Impact factor:   2.448


  38 in total

1.  [Wound healing in the elderly].

Authors:  S A Eming; M Wlaschek; K Scharffetter-Kochanek
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  Tissue Oxygenation Changes to Assess Healing in Venous Leg Ulcers Using Near-Infrared Optical Imaging.

Authors:  Rebecca Kwasinski; Cristianne Fernandez; Kevin Leiva; Richard Schutzman; Edwin Robledo; Penelope Kallis; Luis J Borda; Robert Kirsner; Francisco Perez-Clavijo; Anuradha Godavarty
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 3.  Wound samples: moving towards a standardised method of collection and analysis.

Authors:  Sarah Ramsay; Linda Cowan; Jeffrey M Davidson; Lillian Nanney; Gregory Schultz
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-01-11       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Adalimumab treatment leads to reduction of tissue tumor necrosis factor-alpha correlated with venous leg ulcer improvement: a pilot study.

Authors:  Joshua D Fox; Katherine L Baquerizo-Nole; Brian R Keegan; Flor Macquhae; Julia Escandon; Aliette Espinosa; Carmen Perez; Paolo Romanelli; Robert S Kirsner
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery (SEPS) for treating venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  Zhiliang Caleb Lin; Paula M Loveland; Renea V Johnston; Michael Bruce; Carolina D Weller
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-03

6.  Hyaluronic Acid Sodium Salt 0.2% Gel in the Treatment of a Recalcitrant Distal Leg Ulcer: A Case Report.

Authors:  Mario Tagliagambe; Tuan A Elstrom; Daniel B Ward
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2017-11-01

Review 7.  Regenerative Medicine: Charting a New Course in Wound Healing.

Authors:  Geoffrey C Gurtner; Mary Ann Chapman
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Use of advanced technologies across the wound care spectrum: prologue.

Authors:  Robert S Kirsner; Marco Romanelli
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  The Wound Healing Index for Predicting Venous Leg Ulcer Outcome.

Authors:  Caroline E Fife; Susan D Horn
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Healing Chronic Wounds: Current Challenges and Potential Solutions.

Authors:  Evan Darwin; Marjana Tomic-Canic
Journal:  Curr Dermatol Rep       Date:  2018-10-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.