Literature DB >> 24623511

Adaptation of naturally paced saccades.

Michael J Gray1, Annabelle Blangero2, James P Herman3, Josh Wallman2, Mark R Harwood2.   

Abstract

In the natural environment, humans make saccades almost continuously. In many eye movement experiments, however, observers are required to fixate for unnaturally long periods of time. The resulting long and monotonous experimental sessions can become especially problematic when collecting data in a clinical setting, where time can be scarce and subjects easily fatigued. With this in mind, we tested whether the well-studied motor learning process of saccade adaptation could be induced with a dramatically shortened intertrial interval. Observers made saccades to targets that stepped left or right either ∼250 ms or ∼1,600 ms after the saccade landed. In experiment I, we tested baseline saccade parameters to four different target amplitudes (5°, 10°, 15°, and 20°) in the two timing settings. In experiments II and III, we adapted 10° saccades via 2° intrasaccadic steps either backwards or forwards, respectively. Seven subjects performed eight separate adaptation sessions (2 intertrial timings × 2 adaptation direction × 2 session trial lengths). Adaptation proceeded remarkably similarly in both timing conditions across the multiple sessions. In the faster-paced sessions, robust adaptation was achieved in under 2 min, demonstrating the efficacy of our approach to streamlining saccade adaptation experiments. Although saccade amplitudes were similar between conditions, the faster-paced condition unexpectedly resulted in significantly higher peak velocities in all subjects. This surprising finding demonstrates that the stereotyped "main sequence" relationship between saccade amplitude and peak velocity is not as fixed as originally thought.
Copyright © 2014 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  main sequence; motor learning; saccade adaptation; speed-accuracy trade-off

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24623511      PMCID: PMC4097875          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00905.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  58 in total

1.  Idiosyncratic characteristics of saccadic eye movements when viewing different visual environments.

Authors:  T J Andrews; D M Coppola
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning.

Authors:  C M Harris; D M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-08-20       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Comparison of the discharge characteristics of brain stem omnipause neurons and superior colliculus fixation neurons in monkey: implications for control of fixation and saccade behavior.

Authors:  S Everling; M Paré; M C Dorris; D P Munoz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Gaze-shift dynamics in two kinds of sequential looking tasks.

Authors:  J Epelboim; R M Steinman; E Kowler; Z Pizlo; C J Erkelens; H Collewijn
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Decrease in saccadic performance after many visually guided saccadic eye movements in monkeys.

Authors:  A Straube; F R Robinson; A F Fuchs
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Square-root relations between main saccadic parameters.

Authors:  S Lebedev; P Van Gelder; W H Tsui
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Saccadic undershoot is not inevitable: saccades can be accurate.

Authors:  Z Kapoula; D A Robinson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Involvement of the cerebellar thalamus in human saccade adaptation.

Authors:  B Gaymard; S Rivaud-Péchoux; J Yelnik; B Pidoux; C J Ploner
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Retinal eccentricity and the latency of eye saccades.

Authors:  R P Kalesnykas; P E Hallett
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Saccadic gain modification: visual error drives motor adaptation.

Authors:  J Wallman; A F Fuchs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  2 in total

1.  Saccadic adaptation to a systematically varying disturbance.

Authors:  Carlos R Cassanello; Sven Ohl; Martin Rolfs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A generative learning model for saccade adaptation.

Authors:  Carlos R Cassanello; Florian Ostendorf; Martin Rolfs
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.475

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.