| Literature DB >> 24623370 |
M T W Teo1, L Dyrskjøt2, J Nsengimana1, C Buchwald3, H Snowden1, J Morgan4, J B Jensen5, M A Knowles6, G Taylor4, J H Barrett1, M Borre5, T F Ørntoft2, D T Bishop1, A E Kiltie7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) can be cured by radical radiotherapy (RT). We previously found tumour MRE11 expression to be predictive of survival following RT in MIBC, and this was independently validated in a separate institute. Here, we investigated germline MRE11A variants as possible predictors of RT outcomes in MIBC, using next-generation sequencing (NGS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The MRE11A gene was amplified in germline DNA from 186 prospectively recruited MIBC patients treated with RT and sequenced using bar-coded multiplexed NGS. Germline variants were analysed for associations with cancer-specific survival (CSS). For validation as a prognostic or predictive marker, rs1805363 was then genotyped in a cystectomy-treated MIBC cohort of 256 individuals. MRE11A mRNA isoform expression was measured in bladder cancer cell lines and primary tumour samples.Entities:
Keywords: MRE11A; biomarkers; bladder cancer; cystectomy; next-generation sequencing; radiotherapy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24623370 PMCID: PMC3969555 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Oncol ISSN: 0923-7534 Impact factor: 32.976
Clinical demographics of the MIBC study cohorts
| Variable | RT-treated cohort ( | Cystectomy-treated cohort ( |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | ||
| Median (range) | 79 (55–93) | 65 (34–85) |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 139 (74.7) | 187 (73.0) |
| Female | 47 (25.3) | 69 (27.0) |
| Tumour stagea | ||
| T2 | 118 (63.5) | 94 (36.7) |
| T3 | 51 (27.5) | 112 (47.6) |
| T4 | 9 (4.9) | 40 (15.7) |
| Tx | 8 (4.4) | 0 (0.0) |
| Nodal stage | ||
| N0 | 179 (96.3) | 184 (71.9) |
| N1 | 4 (2.2) | 32 (12.5) |
| N2+ | 2 (1.1) | 39 (15.2) |
| Nx | 1 (0.6) | 1 (0.4) |
| Histological grade | ||
| High grade | 167 (89.8) | 251 (98.0) |
| Low grade | 14 (7.6) | 5 (2.0) |
| Unrecorded | 5 (2.7) | 0 (0.0) |
| Hydronephrosis | ||
| No | 135 (72.6) | Data not available |
| Yes | 51 (27.5) | Data not available |
| Neoadjuvant chemotherapy | ||
| Not received | 175 (94.1) | 256 (100.0) |
| Received | 11 (6)b | 0 (0.0) |
| Concurrent chemotherapy/radiosensitizer | ||
| Not received | 171 (91.9) | 256 (100.0) |
| Received | 15 (8.1)c | 0 (0.0) |
| Salvage/adjuvant chemotherapyc | ||
| Not received | 177 (95.2) | 256 (100.0) |
| Received | 9 (4.9) | 0 (0.0) |
| Salvage cystectomy | ||
| Not received | 167 (89.8) | Not applicable |
| Received | 19 (10.3) | Not applicable |
aTumour stage in the RT-treated cohort was the highest of the pre-treatment biopsy and radiological stage; in the cystectomy-treated cohort, the highest of the pre-treatment biopsy and post-cystectomy pathological stage.
bAll received platinum-based combination chemotherapy.
cTen patients received concurrent gemcitabine (100 mg/m2) weekly ×4 as part of a phase II clinical trial and five patients received concurrent carbogen and nicotinamide as part of the BCON phase III clinical trial.
Cox proportional hazards multivariate analysis of cancer-specific survival in demographical, histological/clinic-pathological variables, and in rs1805363, rs13447623 and 3′ UTR rare variants
| Covariates | HR (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at diagnosis (years) | 1.01 (0.98–1.04) | 0.61 | ||
| Gender (male versus female) | 0.72 (0.39–1.31) | 0.28 | ||
| T stage (increasing stage) | 1.50 (0.98–2.30) | 0.06 | ||
| N stage (increasing stage) | 1.96 (0.88–4.37) | 0.10 | ||
| Histological grade (increasing grade) | 1.12 (0.50–2.48) | 0.79 | ||
| Hydronephrosis (yes versus no) | 1.21 (0.66–2.22) | 0.53 | ||
| Neoadjuvant/concurrent chemotherapy (yes versus no) | 0.52 (0.22–1.20) | 0.12 | ||
| Variant (observed MAF) | Genotype | |||
| rs1805363 G > A (0.11) | GG | 152 | 1 | |
| AG | 28 | 1.49 (0.80–2.78) | ||
| AA | 6 | 8.00 (2.93–21.90) | ||
| rs13447623 A > G (0.25) | AA | 110 | 1 | |
| AG | 62 | 0.86 (0.50–1.49) | ||
| GG | 14 | 3.68 (1.78–7.60) | ||
| Joint two-SNP analysis | ||||
| rs1805363 G > A | 2.19 (1.12–4.30) | |||
| rs13447623 A > G | 0.95 (0.54–1.66) | 0.86 | ||
| Rare variants collapsed analysis | ||||
| No 3′ UTR rare variants | 179 | 1 | ||
| 1+ 3′ UTR rare variants | 7 | 4.04 (1.42–11.51) | ||
aSignificant P-values of <0.05 are in bold.
Figure 1.Kaplan–Meier graphs of (A) cancer-specific survival (CSS) for carriers of at least one 3′ UTR MRE11A rare variant allele in the RT-treated MIBC cohort; (B) CSS for MRE11A rs1805363 genotypes in the RT-treated MIBC cohort and (C) CSS for MRE11A rs1805363 genotypes in the cystectomy-treated MIBC cohort.
Figure 2.(A) MRE11A isoform 1 and isoform 2 alternative splicing and the relative position of common SNP rs1805363 with sequencing forward (F) and reverse (R) primer relative positions indicated. (B) MRE11A isoform expression in bladder cancer cell lines and primary bladder tumours with different genotypes for rs1805363: (i) gel electrophoresis bands for MRE11A isoforms 1 and 2, GAPDH PCR amplified from cDNA from six bladder cancer cell lines (all wild-type GG genotype for rs1805363), primary bladder tumours A and B (heterozygote GA genotype for rs1805363) and primary bladder tumour C (homozygote variant AA genotype for rs1805363) and (ii) percentage expression of MRE11A for each isoform relative to overall MRE11A expression for each sample.