Literature DB >> 18066087

ATM and the Mre11 complex combine to recognize and signal DNA double-strand breaks.

M F Lavin1.   

Abstract

The recognition and repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is a complex process that draws upon a multitude of proteins. This is not surprising since this is a lethal lesion if left unrepaired and also contributes to genome instability and the consequential risk of cancer and other pathologies. Some of the key proteins that recognize these breaks in DNA are mutated in distinct genetic disorders that predispose to agent sensitivity, genome instability, cancer predisposition and/or neurodegeneration. These include members of the Mre11 complex (Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1) and ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) mutated (ATM), mutated in the human genetic disorder A-T. The mre11 (MRN) complex appears to be the major sensor of the breaks and subsequently recruits ATM where it is activated to phosphorylate in turn members of that complex and a variety of other proteins involved in cell-cycle control and DNA repair. The MRN complex is also upstream of ATM and ATR (A-T-mutated and rad3-related) protein in responding to agents that block DNA replication. To date, more than 30 ATM-dependent substrates have been identified in multiple pathways that maintain genome stability and reduce the risk of disease. We focus here on the relationship between ATM and the MRN complex in recognizing and responding to DNA DSBs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18066087     DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncogene        ISSN: 0950-9232            Impact factor:   9.867


  130 in total

1.  Dual functions of Nbs1 in the repair of DNA breaks and proliferation ensure proper V(D)J recombination and T-cell development.

Authors:  Amal Saidi; Tangliang Li; Falk Weih; Patrick Concannon; Zhao-Qi Wang
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Timely synthesis of the adenovirus type 5 E1B 55-kilodalton protein is required for efficient genome replication in normal human cells.

Authors:  Jasdave S Chahal; S J Flint
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Delineation of WRN helicase function with EXO1 in the replicational stress response.

Authors:  Monika Aggarwal; Joshua A Sommers; Christa Morris; Robert M Brosh
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2010-05-05

4.  Serotype-specific inactivation of the cellular DNA damage response during adenovirus infection.

Authors:  Natalie A Forrester; Garry G Sedgwick; Anoushka Thomas; Andrew N Blackford; Thomas Speiseder; Thomas Dobner; Philip J Byrd; Grant S Stewart; Andrew S Turnell; Roger J A Grand
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 5.  Chromatin dynamics and the repair of DNA double strand breaks.

Authors:  Ye Xu; Brendan D Price
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  Mec1p associates with functionally compromised telomeres.

Authors:  Ronald E Hector; Alo Ray; Bo-Ruei Chen; Rebecca Shtofman; Kathleen L Berkner; Kurt W Runge
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  CtIP mediates replication fork recovery in a FANCD2-regulated manner.

Authors:  Jung Eun Yeo; Eu Han Lee; Eric A Hendrickson; Alexandra Sobeck
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  Differential requirements of the C terminus of Nbs1 in suppressing adenovirus DNA replication and promoting concatemer formation.

Authors:  Seema S Lakdawala; Rachel A Schwartz; Kevin Ferenchak; Christian T Carson; Brian P McSharry; Gavin W Wilkinson; Matthew D Weitzman
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Aggressive chronic lymphocytic leukemia with elevated genomic complexity is associated with multiple gene defects in the response to DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Peter Ouillette; Samuel Fossum; Brian Parkin; Li Ding; Paula Bockenstedt; Ammar Al-Zoubi; Kerby Shedden; Sami N Malek
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 10.  DNA resection in eukaryotes: deciding how to fix the break.

Authors:  Pablo Huertas
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 15.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.