Literature DB >> 22169268

Independent validation of genes and polymorphisms reported to be associated with radiation toxicity: a prospective analysis study.

Gillian C Barnett1, Charlotte E Coles, Rebecca M Elliott, Caroline Baynes, Craig Luccarini, Don Conroy, Jennifer S Wilkinson, Jonathan Tyrer, Vivek Misra, Radka Platte, Sarah L Gulliford, Matthew R Sydes, Emma Hall, Søren M Bentzen, David P Dearnaley, Neil G Burnet, Paul D P Pharoah, Alison M Dunning, Catharine M L West.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported associations between radiation toxicity and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in candidate genes. Few associations have been tested in independent validation studies. This prospective study aimed to validate reported associations between genotype and radiation toxicity in a large independent dataset.
METHODS: 92 (of 98 attempted) SNPs in 46 genes were successfully genotyped in 1613 patients: 976 received adjuvant breast radiotherapy in the Cambridge breast IMRT trial (ISRCTN21474421, n=942) or in a prospective study of breast toxicity at the Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK (n=34). A further 637 received radical prostate radiotherapy in the MRC RT01 multicentre trial (ISRCTN47772397, n=224) or in the Conventional or Hypofractionated High Dose Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer (CHHiP) trial (ISRCTN97182923, n=413). Late toxicity was assessed 2 years after radiotherapy with a validated photographic technique (patients with breast cancer only), clinical assessment, and patient questionnaires. Association tests of genotype with overall radiation toxicity score and individual endpoints were undertaken in univariate and multivariable analyses. At a type I error rate adjusted for multiple testing, this study had 99% power to detect a SNP, with minor allele frequency of 0·35, associated with a per allele odds ratio of 2·2.
FINDINGS: None of the previously reported associations were confirmed by this study, after adjustment for multiple comparisons. The p value distribution of the SNPs tested against overall toxicity score was not different from that expected by chance.
INTERPRETATION: We did not replicate previously reported late toxicity associations, suggesting that we can essentially exclude the hypothesis that published SNPs individually exert a clinically relevant effect. Continued recruitment of patients into studies within the Radiogenomics Consortium is essential so that sufficiently powered studies can be done and methodological challenges addressed. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK, The Royal College of Radiologists, Addenbrooke's Charitable Trust, Breast Cancer Campaign, Cambridge National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, East Midlands Innovation, the National Cancer Institute, Joseph Mitchell Trust, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Institute of Cancer Research NIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Cancer.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22169268     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70302-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  87 in total

1.  Association between SNPs in defined functional pathways and risk of early or late toxicity as well as individual radiosensitivity.

Authors:  Sebastian Reuther; Silke Szymczak; Annette Raabe; Kerstin Borgmann; Andreas Ziegler; Cordula Petersen; Ekkehard Dikomey; Ulrike Hoeller
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  New challenges in high-energy particle radiobiology.

Authors:  M Durante
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Lack of toxicity in a patient with germline TP53 mutation treated with radiotherapy.

Authors:  P Wong; K Han
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Molecular biomarkers in the decision of treatment of cervical carcinoma patients.

Authors:  A Valenciano; L A Henríquez-Hernández; M Lloret; B Pinar; P C Lara
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 5.  New biological markers in the decision of treatment of head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  A Valenciano; L A Henríquez-Hernández; M Lloret; B Pinar; P C Lara
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 3.405

6.  Pre-radiotherapy identification of individual genomic profile to avoid, by resort to customized radiosensitizers, the risk of radioresistance development in patients with localized prostate cancer: author reply.

Authors:  A Berlin; A Dal Pra; R G Bristow
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  [Interprofessional collaboration of physicians and respiratory therapists : It is easier as a team].

Authors:  O Karg
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 8.  Radiogenomics: Identification of Genomic Predictors for Radiation Toxicity.

Authors:  Barry S Rosenstein
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 9.  Strategic evaluation of interventions to prevent consequential late proctitis after prostate radiation therapy: new clinical trial designs should be considered.

Authors:  Timothy N Showalter; Nolan A Wages; Nitin Ohri
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 10.  Polymorphisms in base excision repair genes: Breast cancer risk and individual radiosensitivity.

Authors:  Clarice Patrono; Silvia Sterpone; Antonella Testa; Renata Cozzi
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.