AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this work was to assess the impact of cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) on the development and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study in adults with type 2 diabetes. Patients with end-stage renal disease were excluded. CKD was defined as the presence of albuminuria (albumin/creatinine ratio GFR > 3.4 mg/mmol) or an estimated (eGFR) < 60 ml min(-1) 1.73 m(-2). CKD progression was based on repeated eGFR measurements and/or the development of albuminuria. CAN was assessed using heart rate variability. RESULTS: Two hundred and four patients were included in the analysis. At baseline, the prevalence of CKD and CAN was 40% and 42%, respectively. Patients with CAN had lower eGFR and higher prevalence of albuminuria and CKD. Spectral analysis variables were independently associated with eGFR, albuminuria and CKD at baseline. After a follow-up of 2.5 years, eGFR declined to a greater extent in patients with CAN than in those without CAN (-9.0 ± 17.8% vs -3.3 ± 10.3%, p = 0.009). After adjustment for baseline eGFR and baseline differences, CAN remained an independent predictor of eGFR decline over the follow-up period (β = -3.5, p = 0.03). Spectral analysis variables were also independent predictors of eGFR decline. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: CAN was independently associated with CKD, albuminuria and eGFR in patients with type 2 diabetes. In addition, CAN was an independent predictor of the decline in eGFR over the follow-up period. CAN could be used to identify patients with type 2 diabetes who are at increased risk of rapid decline in eGFR, so that preventative therapies might be intensified.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this work was to assess the impact of cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) on the development and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study in adults with type 2 diabetes. Patients with end-stage renal disease were excluded. CKD was defined as the presence of albuminuria (albumin/creatinine ratio GFR > 3.4 mg/mmol) or an estimated (eGFR) < 60 ml min(-1) 1.73 m(-2). CKD progression was based on repeated eGFR measurements and/or the development of albuminuria. CAN was assessed using heart rate variability. RESULTS: Two hundred and four patients were included in the analysis. At baseline, the prevalence of CKD and CAN was 40% and 42%, respectively. Patients with CAN had lower eGFR and higher prevalence of albuminuria and CKD. Spectral analysis variables were independently associated with eGFR, albuminuria and CKD at baseline. After a follow-up of 2.5 years, eGFR declined to a greater extent in patients with CAN than in those without CAN (-9.0 ± 17.8% vs -3.3 ± 10.3%, p = 0.009). After adjustment for baseline eGFR and baseline differences, CAN remained an independent predictor of eGFR decline over the follow-up period (β = -3.5, p = 0.03). Spectral analysis variables were also independent predictors of eGFR decline. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: CAN was independently associated with CKD, albuminuria and eGFR in patients with type 2 diabetes. In addition, CAN was an independent predictor of the decline in eGFR over the follow-up period. CAN could be used to identify patients with type 2 diabetes who are at increased risk of rapid decline in eGFR, so that preventative therapies might be intensified.
Authors: Kunihiro Matsushita; Marije van der Velde; Brad C Astor; Mark Woodward; Andrew S Levey; Paul E de Jong; Josef Coresh; Ron T Gansevoort Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-05-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Henri Afghahi; Jan Cederholm; Björn Eliasson; Björn Zethelius; Soffia Gudbjörnsdottir; Henrik Hadimeri; Maria K Svensson Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2010-09-03 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Y M Smulders; A Jager; J Gerritsen; J M Dekker; G Nijpels; R J Heine; L M Bouter; C D Stehouwer Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Andrew S Levey; Josef Coresh; Tom Greene; Lesley A Stevens; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Stephen Hendriksen; John W Kusek; Frederick Van Lente Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2006-08-15 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Phillip A Low; Lisa M Benrud-Larson; David M Sletten; Tonette L Opfer-Gehrking; Stephen D Weigand; Peter C O'Brien; Guillermo A Suarez; Peter J Dyck Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Hiroki Kobayashi; Helen C Looker; Eiichiro Satake; Pierre Jean Saulnier; Zaipul I Md Dom; Kristina O'Neil; Katsuhito Ihara; Bozena Krolewski; Andrzej T Galecki; Monika A Niewczas; Jonathan M Wilson; Alessandro Doria; Kevin L Duffin; Robert G Nelson; Andrzej S Krolewski Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2022-05-23 Impact factor: 18.998
Authors: Kevin M Wheelock; Mamta Jaiswal; Catherine L Martin; Gudeta D Fufaa; E Jennifer Weil; Kevin V Lemley; Berne Yee; Eva Feldman; Frank C Brosius; William C Knowler; Robert G Nelson; Rodica Pop-Busui Journal: J Diabetes Complications Date: 2016-03-11 Impact factor: 2.852
Authors: Christian S Hansen; Tommi Suvitaival; Simone Theilade; Ismo Mattila; Maria Lajer; Kajetan Trošt; Linda Ahonen; Tine W Hansen; Cristina Legido-Quigley; Peter Rossing; Tarunveer S Ahluwalia Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2022-04-14 Impact factor: 6.055