PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the differences in cooling behavior between the first-generation cryoballoon (CB-1G) and the second-generation cryoballoon (CB-2G) quantitatively to understand the freezing capabilities and to benefit from the improved efficacy of the CB-2G in patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS: We analyzed quantitatively the ice formation of the CB-1G and CB-2G catheters in vitro in a 37°C warm water bath during freezing for 60, 120, 180, 240, and 300s, respectively. RESULTS: The mean-covered surface area and the relative coverage of the ice spots on the CB-2G were significantly different from the spots on the CB-1G for the 28-mm CBs but not for the 23-mm CBs. Whereas for the CB-1G, the ice formation was discontiguous with four isolated ice spots; the CB-2G showed a contiguous ice cap covering the entire distal part including the pole of the balloon. No homogeneous cooling behavior could be observed at the equatorial level with both catheters. Temporal differences on the ice formation could be observed for the 28-mm CB-2G but not for the 23-mm CB-2G. CONCLUSION: The new-generation CB-2G showed more powerful and homogeneous cooling behavior, especially for the 28-mm CB. Whether this translates into higher long-term success rates is currently unknown. The impact of the more effective cooling and the longer dissolving duration of the ice cap of the new-generation CB-2G on procedural safety needs to be investigated.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the differences in cooling behavior between the first-generation cryoballoon (CB-1G) and the second-generation cryoballoon (CB-2G) quantitatively to understand the freezing capabilities and to benefit from the improved efficacy of the CB-2G in patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS: We analyzed quantitatively the ice formation of the CB-1G and CB-2G catheters in vitro in a 37°C warm water bath during freezing for 60, 120, 180, 240, and 300s, respectively. RESULTS: The mean-covered surface area and the relative coverage of the ice spots on the CB-2G were significantly different from the spots on the CB-1G for the 28-mm CBs but not for the 23-mm CBs. Whereas for the CB-1G, the ice formation was discontiguous with four isolated ice spots; the CB-2G showed a contiguous ice cap covering the entire distal part including the pole of the balloon. No homogeneous cooling behavior could be observed at the equatorial level with both catheters. Temporal differences on the ice formation could be observed for the 28-mm CB-2G but not for the 23-mm CB-2G. CONCLUSION: The new-generation CB-2G showed more powerful and homogeneous cooling behavior, especially for the 28-mm CB. Whether this translates into higher long-term success rates is currently unknown. The impact of the more effective cooling and the longer dissolving duration of the ice cap of the new-generation CB-2G on procedural safety needs to be investigated.
Authors: Jason G Andrade; Marc Dubuc; Peter G Guerra; Laurent Macle; Blandine Mondésert; Léna Rivard; Denis Roy; Mario Talajic; Bernard Thibault; Paul Khairy Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2012-06-05 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Jason G Andrade; Marc Dubuc; Peter G Guerra; Evelyn Landry; Nicolas Coulombe; Hugues Leduc; Léna Rivard; Laurent Macle; Bernard Thibault; Mario Talajic; Denis Roy; Paul Khairy Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2013-03-13
Authors: Michael Kühne; Sven Knecht; David Altmann; Nadine Kawel; Peter Ammann; Beat Schaer; Stefan Osswald; Christian Sticherling Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2012-10-23 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Alexander Fürnkranz; Stefano Bordignon; Boris Schmidt; Melanie Gunawardene; Britta Schulte-Hahn; Verena Urban; Frank Bode; Bernd Nowak; Julian K R Chun Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2013-02-11
Authors: Sven Knecht; Michael Kühne; David Altmann; Peter Ammann; Beat Schaer; Stefan Osswald; Christian Sticherling Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2012-11-06
Authors: Ivan Zeljkovic; Sven Knecht; Florian Spies; Tobias Reichlin; Stefan Osswald; Michael Kühne; Christian Sticherling Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2020-01-07 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Joerelle Mojica; Felicia Lipartiti; Maysam Al Housari; Gezim Bala; Shuichiro Kazawa; Vincenzo Miraglia; Cinzia Monaco; Ingrid Overeinder; Antanas Strazdas; Robbert Ramak; Gaetano Paparella; Juan Sieira; Lucio Capulzini; Antonio Sorgente; Erwin Stroker; Pedro Brugada; Carlo De Asmundis; Gian-Battista Chierchia Journal: J Atr Fibrillation Date: 2021-06-30
Authors: Narendra Kumar; Trang Dinh; Mohamed Magdi Abbas; Kevin Phan; Randolph Manusama; Suzanne Philippens; Jos Maessen; Carl Timmermans Journal: Res Cardiovasc Med Date: 2015-02-20