BACKGROUND: The novel Polarx™ cryoablation system is currently being studied for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. To the best of our knowledge, no study comparing the novel cryoablation system with the standard Arctic Front™ cryoballoon is available in today's literature. This study aims to compare Polarx™ and Arctic Front™ cryoballoon in terms of safety and efficacy. METHODS: From a total cohort of 202 patients who underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for paroxysmal AF through cryoablation, a population of 30 patients who used Polarx™ were compared with 30 propensity-score matched patients who used Arctic Front™. RESULTS: Pulmonary vein occlusion and electrical isolation were achieved in all (100%) veins with a mean number of 1.09 ± 0.3 occlusion per vein using Polarx™ and 1.19 ± 0.5 occlusion per vein using Arctic Front™ (p = 0.6). Shorter procedure and fluoroscopy time were observed with Polarx™ group (60.5 ± 14.23 vs 73.43 ± 13.26 mins, p = 0.001; 12.83 ± 6.03 vs 17.23 ± 7.17 mins, p = 0.01, respectively). Lower cumulative freeze duration per vein was also observed with Polarx™ (203.38 ± 72.03 vs 224.9 ± 79.35 mins, p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in isolation time between the two groups (34.47 ± 21.23 vs 34.18 ± 26.79 secs, p = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: The novel Polarx™ cryoablation system showed similar efficacy in vein occlusion and isolation and safety profile when compared to Arctic Front™ cryoablation system. Procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and cumulative freeze duration were significantly lower with Polarx™ cryoablation system.
BACKGROUND: The novel Polarx™ cryoablation system is currently being studied for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. To the best of our knowledge, no study comparing the novel cryoablation system with the standard Arctic Front™ cryoballoon is available in today's literature. This study aims to compare Polarx™ and Arctic Front™ cryoballoon in terms of safety and efficacy. METHODS: From a total cohort of 202 patients who underwent pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for paroxysmal AF through cryoablation, a population of 30 patients who used Polarx™ were compared with 30 propensity-score matched patients who used Arctic Front™. RESULTS: Pulmonary vein occlusion and electrical isolation were achieved in all (100%) veins with a mean number of 1.09 ± 0.3 occlusion per vein using Polarx™ and 1.19 ± 0.5 occlusion per vein using Arctic Front™ (p = 0.6). Shorter procedure and fluoroscopy time were observed with Polarx™ group (60.5 ± 14.23 vs 73.43 ± 13.26 mins, p = 0.001; 12.83 ± 6.03 vs 17.23 ± 7.17 mins, p = 0.01, respectively). Lower cumulative freeze duration per vein was also observed with Polarx™ (203.38 ± 72.03 vs 224.9 ± 79.35 mins, p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in isolation time between the two groups (34.47 ± 21.23 vs 34.18 ± 26.79 secs, p = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: The novel Polarx™ cryoablation system showed similar efficacy in vein occlusion and isolation and safety profile when compared to Arctic Front™ cryoablation system. Procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and cumulative freeze duration were significantly lower with Polarx™ cryoablation system.
Authors: Andreas Metzner; Peter Rausch; Christine Lemes; Bruno Reissmann; Alexander Bardyszewski; Roland Tilz; Andreas Rillig; Shibu Mathew; Sebastian Deiss; Masashi Kamioka; Tobias Toennis; Tina Lin; Feifan Ouyang; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Erik Wissner Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2014-01-30
Authors: Jean Sylvain Hermida; Jian Chen; Christian Meyer; Saverio Iacopino; Giuseppe Arena; Nikola Pavlovic; Vedran Velagic; Stewart Healey; Douglas L Packer; Heinz-Friedrich Pitschner; Carlo de Asmundis; Malte Kuniss; Gian Battista Chierchia Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2019-12-18 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Andreas Metzner; Bruno Reissmann; Peter Rausch; Shibu Mathew; Peter Wohlmuth; Roland Tilz; Andreas Rillig; Christine Lemes; Sebastian Deiss; Christian Heeger; Masashi Kamioka; Tina Lin; Feifan Ouyang; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Erik Wissner Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2014-03-08
Authors: Frederic Sacher; Pierre Jais; Kent Stephenson; Mark D O'Neill; Meleze Hocini; Jacques Clementy; William G Stevenson; Michel Haissaguerre Journal: Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Date: 2007-01-01