Literature DB >> 23130991

Anatomical predictors for acute and mid-term success of cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation using the 28 mm balloon.

Sven Knecht1, Michael Kühne, David Altmann, Peter Ammann, Beat Schaer, Stefan Osswald, Christian Sticherling.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cryoballoon (CB) pulmonary vein isolation (CB-PVI) for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) has been demonstrated to be safe and reliable. Preprocedural patient selection to address the high variability in pulmonary vein (PV) anatomy may improve the acute and chronic success of CB-PVI. The purpose of this study was to identify anatomical predictors for CB-PVI failure using the 28 mm balloon. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We included 47 patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing CB-PVI with the 28 mm CB. Anatomical global left atrial and PV selective parameters were quantified from 3-dimensional reconstructed preprocedural computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging data. The mean follow-up was 26 ± 9 months (range: 12-32 months). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a continuous sharp left lateral ridge between the left PVs and the left lateral appendage (OR, 7.09; 95% CI, 1.17-43.47) and a sharp carina between the left superior and left inferior PV (OR, 5.99; 95% CI, 1.33-27.03) predict acute and mid-term failure. For the right inferior PVs, a non-perpendicular angle between the axis of the PV and the ostial plane (OR, 6.33; 95% CI, 1.20-33.33) and an early branching PV with change in the axis angle (OR, 7.41; 95% CI, 1.44-38.46) were predictors of acute and mid-term failure.
CONCLUSION: Anatomical variables preventing maximal heat transfer from the tissue to the CB could be identified as predictors for CB-PVI failure with the 28 mm balloon. These findings may be a step toward a more tailored ablation strategy based on individual anatomical variations.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23130991     DOI: 10.1111/jce.12003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  14 in total

1.  Anatomic predictors of recurrence after cryoablation for atrial fibrillation: a computed tomography based composite score.

Authors:  Aditi S Vaishnav; Edris Alderwish; Kristie M Coleman; Moussa Saleh; Parth Makker; Kabir Bhasin; Neil E Bernstein; Nicholas T Skipitaris; Stavros E Mountantonakis
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Anatomical predictors for successful pulmonary vein isolation using balloon-based technologies in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Alexey Tsyganov; Jan Petru; Jan Skoda; Lucie Sediva; Pavel Hala; Jiri Weichet; Marek Janotka; Milan Chovanec; Petr Neuzil; Vivek Y Reddy
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Quantitative assessment of a second-generation cryoballoon ablation catheter with new cooling technology-a perspective on potential implications on outcome.

Authors:  Sven Knecht; Michael Kühne; Stefan Osswald; Christian Sticherling
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Conjoined Inferior Pulmonary Veins during Pulmonary Vein Isolation: Prevalence and Novel Approach for Pulmonary Vein Isolation with Cryoballoon.

Authors:  Jonathan Spagnola; Estelle Torbey; Rob Sangrigoli; John Harding; Marcin Kowalski
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-04-30

5.  Regular atrial tachycardias following pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a retrospective comparison between the cryoballoon and conventional focal tip radiofrequency techniques.

Authors:  Justo Juliá; Gian-Battista Chierchia; Carlo de Asmundis; Giacomo Mugnai; Juan Sieira; Giuseppe Ciconte; Giacomo Di Giovanni; Giulio Conte; Giannis Baltogiannis; Yukio Saitoh; Kristel Wauters; Ghazala Irfan; Pedro Brugada
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Comparison of atrial fibrillation ablation using cryoballoon versus radiofrequency in patients with left common pulmonary veins: mid-term follow-up results.

Authors:  Cem Çöteli; Muhammet Dural; Yusuf Ziya Şener; Ahmet Hakan Ateş; Metin Okşul; Mert Ruşen Gülşen; Fahrünisa Meryem Betül Erol; Burak Sezenöz; Hikmet Yorgun; Kudret Aytemir
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 1.759

7.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging in atrial fibrillation ablation.

Authors:  Roy Beinart; Saman Nazarian
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-06

Review 8.  The Hot and the Cold: Radiofrequency Versus Cryoballoon Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Richard Ang; Giulia Domenichini; Malcolm C Finlay; Richard J Schilling; Ross J Hunter
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Is cryoballoon ablation preferable to radiofrequency ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation by pulmonary vein isolation? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Junxia Xu; Yingqun Huang; Hongbin Cai; Yue Qi; Nan Jia; Weifeng Shen; Jinxiu Lin; Feng Peng; Wenquan Niu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation versus radiofrequency catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Honglan Ma; Dongdong Sun; Hui Luan; Wei Feng; Yaqiong Zhou; Jine Wu; Caiyun He; Chaofeng Sun
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 1.426

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.